Skip to content

· Public charity

Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare

Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare's mission is to optimize medical recovery and rehabilitation outcomes for all patients in a safe environment that respects their dignity, diversity, and individuality.

$395k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$162k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$794kEducation$546kCommunity Improvement$61kEmployment$12k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $310,207, the rows itemized in this filing. The $395,375 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $85,168 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $266k
$22,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$89M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USC Care Medical Group Inc$162,000
UCLA Foundation$104,167
American Medical Rehab Provider$22,500
Upland Chamber of Commerce$7,740
Triumph Foundation$7,500
San Antonio Regional Hospital Foundation$6,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Upland Chamber of Commerce: $23k → 14%UCLA Foundation: $256k → 14%American Medical Rehabilitati: $28k → 14%Upland Chamber of Commerce: $10k → 14%UCLA Foundation: $104k → 14%American Medical Rehab Provid: $15k → 14%Upland Chamber of Commerce: $8k → 14%Triumph Foundation: $8k → 14%American Medical Rehab Provider: $23k → 14%San Antonio Regional Hospital: $6k → 14%UCLA Foundation: $69k → 14%San Antonio Regional Hospital Foundation: $6k → 14%Triumph Foundation: $8k → 14%San Antonio Regional Hospital: $5k → 14%Pomona Police Officers Assoc: $12k → 14%UCLA Foundation: $13k → 14%USC Care Medical Group Inc: $162k → 14%USC Care Medical Group Inc: $159k → 14%USC Care Medical Group Inc: $123k → 14%USC Care Medical Group Inc: $45k → 14%Rotary Club of Pomona: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$842k · 5 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$842k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+19%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    USC CARE MEDICAL GROUP INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $659k · revenue +39%
  • AM
    American Medical Rehabilitation Providers Association Inc
    3× · 2021–2025 · $65k · revenue +39%
  • UC
    UPLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $55k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • PP
    POMONA POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +19%
  • PI
    PARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue +34%
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF CLAREMONT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Usc Health System

The Corporation is a nonprofit public benefit corporation and is not organized for the private gain of any person. It is organized under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for public and charitable purposes. The Corporation is…

Health
2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
3
California Apartment Association

The organization's mission is to represent the ethical members of the rental housing industry in all aspects of government affairs within the state of california, and to provide information, products and services which contribute to the…

—
4
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
5
Kfhpw Holdings

Supporting kaiser permanente organizations which provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.

—
6
Kaiser Foundation for the Advancement of Integrated Health Care

Kaiser foundation for the advancement of integrated health care is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) advocacy organization to engage in proactive advocacy to promote understanding of the benefits of integrated care and coverage, and support of the…

Health
7
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
8
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
9
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
10
Usc Arcadia Hospital

To provide high-quality healing services while caring for the patient's emotional and spiritual needs and enabling them to achieve health for life.

Health
11
Associated Students University of California Riverside

To serve as the student government body at the university of california, riverside.

Education
12
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Antonio Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Upland Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USC CARE MEDICAL GROUP INC: $659,131 · HealthUSC CARE MEDICAL GROUP INCSan Antonio Hospital Foundation Inc: $31,300 · Health+1 more: $6,800 · HealthUCLA FOUNDATION: $546,025 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONAmerican Medical Rehabilitation Providers Association Inc: $65,000 · OtherPOMONA POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION: $12,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF CLAREMONT FOUNDATION: $5,430 · OtherUPLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $55,240 · Community ImprovementTriumph Foundation: $31,700 · Philanthropy
Health$697,231Education$546,025Other$82,430Community Improvement$55,240Philanthropy$31,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUSC CARE MEDICAL GROUP INC: $659,131 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $546,025 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Medical Rehabilitation Providers Association Inc: $65,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUPLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $55,240 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetTriumph Foundation: $31,700 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSan Antonio Hospital Foundation Inc: $31,300 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPOMONA POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION: $12,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION: $6,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF CLAREMONT FOUNDATION: $5,430 over 1y, 4.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph