Skip to content
Carole and Doug Maibach Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Carole and Doug Maibach Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$58k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

International$75kHuman Services$38kReligion$32kScience & Tech$12kHealth$5kPhilanthropy$3kEducation$2kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$870k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS$25,000
WOODHAVEN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
THE CHILDREN'S CENTER$5,100
ON RIVER TIME$5,000
AGC EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION$5,000
LITTLE HEROES LEAGUE$2,800
APOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF SARASOTA$2,000
ACC GOODWILL FUND$1,000
THE BARTON MALOW FOUNDATION$900
LOVING SHEPHERD MINISTRIES$500
PELOTONIA$207
FOX IN THE D$190
CANTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $593) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TEAM 224: $593 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
IN
OH
VA
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$116k · 5 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$116k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+19%

Still filing today

80%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
HealthInternationalCrime & LegalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $75k · revenue +27%
  • AE
    AGC EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $12k · revenue +88%
  • OR
    ON RIVER TIME
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • AC
    APOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • MN
    MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +173%
  • ES
    EVAN'S SCHOLARS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brian Littleton Foundation
Education
2
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
3
Paulson Family Foundation
Philanthropy
4
The Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research

The foundation is dedicated to finding a cure for parkinson's disease through an aggressively funded research agenda and ensuring the development of improved therapies for those living with parkinson's today.

Health
5
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
6
The Madelon Global Health Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
7
Huntington's Disease Foundation

To fund transformative research to find treatments, and ultimately a cure, for huntington's disease.

Health
8
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
9
Cameron Elliot Olson Foundation a Nj Nonprofit Corporation
Human Services
10
Fox and Monica Benton Foundation
Philanthropy
11
The Fox Foundation
Philanthropy
12
The Huntington Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canton Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Barton Malow Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $75,000 · InternationalLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INCAPOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherAPOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN CHURCHTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $15,100 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S CENTERAGC EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $11,600 · OtherAGC EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCWOODHAVEN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherWOODHAVEN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+9 more: $8,200 · Other+9 moreON RIVER TIME: $10,000 · Crime & LegalLittle Heroes League: $4,210 · PhilanthropyMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthFOX IN THE D: $190 · HealthTEAM 224 INC: $593 · Human ServicesPELOTONIA: $207 · EducationINVEST IN YOUTH: $50 · Youth Development
International$75,000Other$74,900Crime & Legal$10,000Philanthropy$4,210Health$2,190Human Services$593Education$207Youth Development$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAGC EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $11,600 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetON RIVER TIME: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLittle Heroes League: $4,210 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARTON MALOW FOUNDATION: $900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEAM 224 INC: $593 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPELOTONIA: $207 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOX IN THE D: $190 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCANTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINVEST IN YOUTH: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carole and Doug Maibach Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carole and Doug Maibach Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carole and Doug Maibach Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home