Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carol Tyrrell Kyle Foundation Inc Carol C Chenault Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$175k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$102kHuman Services$89kHealth$87kFood & Nutrition$55kEnvironment$55kAnimals$37kEducation$35kHousing & Shelter$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $134k
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,000
TEXAS PUBLIC RADIO$20,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY OF TEXAS - SA$18,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SA$18,000
CHRISTIAN SENIOR SERVICES$15,000
WILDLIFE RESCUE & REHABILITATION$13,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK$10,000
LAMAR UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
HAVEN FOR HOPE OF SAN ANT$6,000
FEEDING AMERICA$6,000
SYMPHONY OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS$5,000
SAN ANTONIO ZOO$5,000
TYRRELL HISTORICAL LIBRARY$5,000
JULIE ROGERS GIFT OF LIFE$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Carol Tyrrell Kyle Foundation Inc Carol C Chenault Trustee’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 89%.

Carol Tyrrell Kyle Foundation Inc Carol C Chenault Trusteelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$536k · 27 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
1

Total granted

$536k
$5k

Still filing today

52%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsFood & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIO
    8× · 2018–2025 · $89k · revenue +153%
  • Feeding America
    7× · 2018–2025 · $35k · revenue +77%
  • WR
    WILDLIFE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $24k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • LU
    LAMAR UNIVERSITY FOUND
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts

The mission of the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts shall be to establish and maintain a museum in order to house and exhibit a permanent collection of art as well as to provide space for traveling exhibitions, for the purpose of the…

Arts & Culture
3
The Tobin Theatre Arts Fund
Arts & Culture
4
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
5
Tyler Museum of Art

Educational and cultural center to enrich lives through collection, study, exhibition, interpretation and celebration of visual arts.

Arts & Culture
6
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—
7
Genetic Resource Association of Texas
Health
8
Texas Association of Museums

The Texas Association of Museums strengthens the Texas museum community through collaborations, connections, professional development, and advocacy.

Arts & Culture
9
The Museum of North Texas History

To collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret the history of the North Texas Area to inspire an interest in the past for the education and enrichment of people of all ages.

Arts & Culture
10
The Museum of Fine Arts Houston

The museum of fine arts, houston serves as a welcoming and inclusive place for all people, connecting the communities of houston with diverse histories of art spanning 6,000 years and six continents. through our permanent collections,…

Arts & Culture
11
Texas State Aquarium Association

The texas state aquarium's mission is engaging people with animals, inspiring appreciation for our seas, and supporting wildlife conservation. its vision is to be a global leader in fostering support for the conservation of the gulf of…

Animals
12
Texas Flying Legends Museum
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Witte Museum; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIO: $89,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIOPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SA: $77,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SANATURE CONSERVANCY OF TEXAS - SA: $36,250 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY OF TEXAS - SAIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $29,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHAVEN FOR HOPE OF SAN ANT: $22,000 · OtherHAVEN FOR HOPE OF SAN ANTSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $20,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO METRO MINISTRY: $18,000 · OtherSYMPHONY OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $17,000 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY OF TX: $14,250 · Other+8 more: $34,700 · Other+8 moreTEXAS PUBLIC RADIO: $33,050 · Arts & CultureWitte Museum: $2,400 · Arts & CultureMCNAY ART MUSEUM: $2,000 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART: $2,000 · Arts & CultureFeeding America: $35,000 · Food & NutritionWILDLIFE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION INC: $24,400 · AnimalsSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $8,000 · AnimalsLamar University Foundation Inc: $26,250 · EducationJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $10,250 · HealthBUCKNER FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · Human Services
Other$392,450Arts & Culture$39,450Food & Nutrition$35,000Animals$32,400Education$26,250Health$10,250Human Services$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIO: $89,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC RADIO: $33,050 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLamar University Foundation Inc: $26,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWILDLIFE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION INC: $24,400 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSYMPHONY OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $17,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $10,250 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTYRRELL HISTORICAL LIBRARY: $10,200 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKNER FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWitte Museum: $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCNAY ART MUSEUM: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds Lamar University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SYMPHONY OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program ↗
  • Who funds TYRRELL HISTORICAL LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BUCKNER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Witte Museum ↗
  • Who funds MCNAY ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

James & Susan Martin Charitable Tr TrustTX15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: James & Susan Martin Charitable Tr Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · GAC Halff Foundation · Harris K & Lois G Oppenheimer Foundation · Mamie McFaddin Ward Heritage Foundation · Impetus Foundation · John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324 · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · Amy Shelton McNutt Charitable Trust · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carol Tyrrell Kyle Foundation Inc Carol C Chenault Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carol Tyrrell Kyle Foundation Inc Carol C Chenault Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carol Tyrrell Kyle Foundation Inc Carol C Chenault Trustee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph