Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Carol and Edmund Blake Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$3.2MYouth Development$796kRecreation & Sports$605kHousing & Shelter$400kEnvironment$268kArts & Culture$199kCommunity Improvement$125kReligion$125kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $761k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$61,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WHITE PLAINS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$300,000
HEPATITIS B FOUNDATION$200,000
PROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE$125,000
RED BANK CATHOLIC FOUNDATION$125,000
MADISON SQUARE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$100,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$100,000
SAVE THE MUSIC FOUNDATION$61,000
PINE STREET INN$50,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
EVERY CHILD A READER$25,000
GAME 7 ENTERPRISES$10,000
AUSABLE RIVER ASSOCIATION$10,000
ANDREW MCDOUNOUGH B FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $400k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PINE STREET INN: $75k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $75k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $50k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $50k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $50k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $50k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $50k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
MA
NJ
CT
MD
DE
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.2M · 13 repeat orgs$817k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +93% since the first grant, against -28% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$5.2M
$621k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
-28%

Still filing today

77%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $196k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    White Plains Hospital Medical Center
    4× · 2022–2025 · $710k · revenue +34%
  • MS
    Madison Square Boys & Girls Club
    6× · 2020–2025 · $636k · revenue +114%
  • PP
    PROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $550k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • HF
    HEPATITIS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $165k
  • MS
    MADISON SQUARE BOYS GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $125k
  • NM
    NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIANBROOKLYN METHODIST
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation

Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…

Recreation & Sports
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
9
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Hudson Yards Development Corporation

See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…

Community Improvement
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Newyork-Presbyterianbrooklyn Methodist and the most unlike its peers is Every Child a Reader Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HEPATITIS B FOUNDATION — $1,500,000 · OtherHEPATITIS B FOUNDATIONMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING — $620,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERINGHEPATITIS FOUNDATION — $165,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $157,000 · OtherRED BANK CATHOLIC FOUNDATION — $125,000 · OtherMADISON SQUARE BOYS GIRLS CLUB — $125,000 · OtherHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $125,000 · Other+9 more — $452,443 · Other+9 moreWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center — $710,000 · HealthWhite Plains H…THE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION — $52,000 · HealthTHE ANDREW MCD…Madison Square Boys & Girls Club — $636,000 · Youth DevelopmentMadison Squ…PROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC — $550,000 · Recreation & SportsPROSPECT P…PINE STREET INN INC — $400,000 · Human ServicesNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $200,000 · EnvironmentAUSABLE FRESHWATER CENTER INCORPORATED — $68,000 · EnvironmentEVERY CHILD A READER INC — $112,500 · Arts & CultureTHE GREEN-WOOD HISTORIC FUND INC — $25,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$3,269,443Health$762,000Youth Development$636,000Recreation & Sports$550,000Human Services$400,000Environment$268,000Arts & Culture$137,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center — $710,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMadison Square Boys & Girls Club — $636,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetPROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC — $550,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC — $400,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $125,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEVERY CHILD A READER INC — $112,500 over 6y, 42% of budgetNEWYORK-PRESBYTERIANBROOKLYN METHODIST — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUSABLE FRESHWATER CENTER INCORPORATED — $68,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetSAVE THE MUSIC FOUNDATION — $61,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION — $52,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBoys Hope Girls Hope of NY Inc — $35,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE GREEN-WOOD HISTORIC FUND INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds White Plains Hospital Medical Center
  • Who funds Madison Square Boys & Girls Club
  • Who funds PROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds HISPANIC FEDERATION INC
  • Who funds EVERY CHILD A READER INC
  • Who funds NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIANBROOKLYN METHODIST
  • Who funds SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED
  • Who funds AUSABLE FRESHWATER CENTER INCORPORATED
  • Who funds SAVE THE MUSIC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Boys Hope Girls Hope of NY Inc
  • Who funds THE GREEN-WOOD HISTORIC FUND INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Carol and Edmund Blake Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Pine Street Inn Inc11% of income from government
  • Sacred Heart University Incorporated1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph