Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carlson Cultural Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$8k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Carlson Cultural Trust’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Chester County Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Carlson Cultural Trust named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $28k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’17
5
’18
3
’19
2
’20
3
’21
4
’22
5
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$675kArts & Culture$84kEducation$82kReligion$6kYouth Development$4k
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RED RAVEN ART COMPANY$7,500
OXFORD ART ALLIANCE$5,000
RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN$4,500
RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN$4,500
PRATT INSTITUTE$2,500
PA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS$2,500
MARYLAND INST COLLEGE OF ART$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 7% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%PENN LONDON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $5k → 6%SOUTHERN END COMM ASSN: $3k → 9%SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $4k → 10%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 22%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $5k → 14%COOPER UNION UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%PRATT INSTITUTE: $5k → 20%RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $5k → 9%RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $5k → 14%MARYLAND INST COLLEGE OF ART: $1k → 19%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%THE CHESTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FDN: $675k → 6%SOUTHERN END COMM ASSN: $1k → 9%SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 10%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 22%COOPER UNION UNIVERSITY: $4k → 17%PRATT INSTITUTE: $5k → 20%RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $4k → 9%RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $4k → 14%THE GARAGE COMMUNITY AND YOUTH CEN: $4k → 6%RED RAVEN ART COMPANY: $8k → 9%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 22%COOPER UNION UNIVERSITY: $3k → 17%PRATT INSTITUTE: $3k → 20%RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $4k → 9%RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $3k → 14%OXFORD ARTS ALLIANCE: $10k → 6%RED RAVEN ART COMPANY: $8k → 9%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 22%COOPER UNION UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%PRATT INSTITUTE: $1k → 20%RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $1k → 14%OXFORD ART ALLIANCE: $5k → 6%RED RAVEN ART COMPANY: $8k → 9%PA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS: $3k → 22%OXFORD ARTS ALLIANCE: $5k → 6%RED RAVEN ART COMPANY: $8k → 9%PA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS: $3k → 22%RED RAVEN ART COMPANY: $7k → 9%PA ACADEMY OF THE ARTS: $3k → 22%FRANKLIN & MARSHALL: $5k → 9%PA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS: $3k → 22%RED RAVEN ART COMPANY: $4k → 9%PA ACADEMY OF THE ARTS: $3k → 22%RED RAVEN ART COMPANY: $4k → 9%PA ACADEMY OF THE ARTS: $3k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$152k · 12 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$152k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+61%

Still filing today

58%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    PRATT INSTITUTE
    4× · 2017–2023 · $13k · revenue +41%
  • RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN
    4× · 2019–2023 · $12k · revenue +8%
  • RC
    RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $12k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • AG
    AVON GROVE PTAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +40%
  • Rochester Institute of Technologygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +61%
  • SC
    SAVANNAH COLLEGE OF ART
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
7
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
11
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
12
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rhode Island School of Design; the most unlike its peers is Avon Grove Pta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Chester County Community Foundation: $675,356 · PhilanthropyChester County Community FoundationRED RAVEN ART COMPANY: $44,500 · OtherRED RAVEN AR…COOPER UNION UNIVERSITY: $11,500 · OtherCOOPER UNION…PA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS: $7,500 · OtherPA ACADEMY O…PA ACADEMY OF THE ARTS: $7,500 · OtherPA ACADEMY O…AVON GROVE PTA: $5,000 · OtherSAVANNAH COLLEGE OF ART: $4,500 · OtherFRANKLIN & MARSHALL: $4,500 · OtherSOUTHERN END COMM ASSN: $4,215 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3,500 · OtherTHE GARAGE COMMUNITY AND YOUTH CEN: $3,500 · OtherPRATT INSTITUTE: $12,500 · EducationRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $11,500 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $11,500 · EducationRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC: $11,500 · EducationSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · EducationRochester Institute of Technology: $4,500 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationOxford Arts Alliance Inc: $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$675,356Other$96,215Education$58,500Arts & Culture$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChester County Community Foundation: $675,356 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetOxford Arts Alliance Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetPRATT INSTITUTE: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $11,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $11,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAVON GROVE PTA: $5,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMaryland Institute: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Chester County Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Oxford Arts Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRATT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AVON GROVE PTA ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Maryland Institute ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carlson Cultural Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carlson Cultural Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Carlson Cultural Trust?

Find your warmest path to Carlson Cultural Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carlson Cultural’s filings →

More from the funding graph