Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Carle Development Foundation

To raise funds from the public and other sources, maintain those funds and, as appropriate, expend principal and income to support the carle foundation mission of providing high quality health care and advancing medical research and education in central illinois.

$15M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$8.6M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$29MEducation$635kHuman Services$108k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $13,623,199 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $14,761,213 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,138,014 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $417k
  • $250k+7 grants · $13M
$333,355
Median grant
1
States reached
$114M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Methodist Medical Center of Illinois$8,587,243
The Carle Foundation Hospital$1,816,665
The Carle Foundation$795,572
Carle Health Care Incorporated$723,806
Proctor Hospital$572,039
Carle BroMenn Medical Center$338,972
Carle West Physician Group$333,355
Hult Center for Healthy Living$202,965
The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois$101,957
Richland Memorial Hospital Inc$61,385
Carle Eureka Hospital$51,133
Pekin Memorial Hospital$20,956
Carle Retirement Centers$11,481
Champaign SurgiCenter LLC$5,670
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $119k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Carle Retirement Centers Inc: $108k → 19%Carle Retirement Centers: $11k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$29M · 12 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$29M
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+9%

Still filing today

92%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    METHODIST MEDICAL CENTER OF ILLINOIS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $9.4M · revenue +8%
  • TC
    THE CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7.8M · revenue +67%
  • TC
    The Carle Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.2M · revenue +139%

Funded once

  • PH
    PROCTOR HEALTH SYSTEMS
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue -11%
  • HC
    Hoopeston Community Memorial Hospital
    one grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue +9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Methodist Medical Center Foundation

The methodist medical center foundation (mmcf) d/b/a carle health center for philanthropy - greater peoria is a tax-exempt illinois not-for-profit corporation established to solicit and manage gifts and bequests on behalf of carle health -…

2
Carle Cancer Institute Normal Llc

To be the destination of choice for cancer treatment services in the eastern region of central illinois through effective partnerships coupled with personalized care.

3
Carle Development Foundation

To raise funds from the public and other sources, maintain those funds and, as appropriate, expend principal and income to support the carle foundation mission of providing high quality health care and advancing medical research and…

Health
4
Cris Healthy Aging

Cris healthy aging is a non-profit organization dedicated to keeping older adults (and persons with disabilites, ages 18-59 years) safe, healthy, and independent in their own homes for as long as possible by providing services designed to…

5
Trillium Place

To be the trusted partner in all healthcare decisions and to improve health by providing highly accessible, world-class care and services.

Health
6
Rush Copley Medical Center

To improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
7
Caromont Health

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
8
Human Service Center

To be the trusted partner in all healthcare decisions and to improve health by providing highly accessible, world-class care and services.

Health
9
Endeavor Health Medical Group

Endeavor Health Medical Group (EHMG) follows the mission of Endeavor Health. The mission of Endeavor Health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." Central to this mission is a commitment to providing clinical programs and…

Health
10
Carroll Hospital Center Inc

Our communities expect and deserve superior medical treatment, compassionate care, and expert guidance in maintaining their health and well-being. at carroll hospital center, we offer an uncompromising commitment to the highest quality…

Health
11
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
12
Gaston Memorial Hospital Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carle West Physician Group Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Carle Foundation Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

METHODIST MEDICAL CENTER OF ILLINOIS — $9,374,910 · HealthMETHODIST MEDICAL CENTER OF ILLINOISTHE CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL — $7,835,846 · HealthTHE CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITALThe Carle Foundation — $5,196,004 · HealthThe Carle FoundationCarle Health Care Incorporated — $1,572,933 · HealthCarle Health Care IncorporatedCarle West Physician Group Inc — $1,289,474 · HealthCarle BroMenn Medical Center — $1,238,527 · Health+6 more — $1,702,929 · Health+6 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS — $634,628 · OtherHult Center for Healthy Living Inc — $300,650 · Other+1 more — $5,670 · OtherCarle Retirement Centers Inc — $119,282 · Human Services
Health$28,210,623Other$940,948Human Services$119,282

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMETHODIST MEDICAL CENTER OF ILLINOIS — $9,374,910 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTHE CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL — $7,835,846 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe Carle Foundation — $5,196,004 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCarle Health Care Incorporated — $1,572,933 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCarle West Physician Group Inc — $1,289,474 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCarle BroMenn Medical Center — $1,238,527 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetProctor Hospital — $877,966 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRICHLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $386,174 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCarle Eureka Hospital — $366,906 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetHult Center for Healthy Living Inc — $300,650 over 2y, 19% of budgetCarle Retirement Centers Inc — $119,282 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPROCTOR HEALTH SYSTEMS — $34,716 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEKIN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $20,956 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHoopeston Community Memorial Hospital — $16,211 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Methodist Medical Center FoundationIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Methodist Medical Center Foundation · The Carle Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Carle Development Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph