Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carl and Lulu Mitchell Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$501k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.9MHuman Services$946kArts & Culture$931kHousing & Shelter$105kEducation$23kAnimals$20kRecreation & Sports$20kReligion$14k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $500k
  • $250k+1 grant · $501k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF CLOVIS SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER$501,000
COMMUNITY MEDICAL FOUNDATION$100,000
MARJAREE MASON CENTER$100,000
3 ANGELS BROADCASTING NETWORK$100,000
VALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$100,000
POVERELLO HOUSE$100,000
CALIFORNIA 911 MEMORIAL$10,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CA$10,000
DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA$10,000
GRACEBOUND$3,000
FRESNO CENTRAL SDA CHURCH$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $445k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $45k → 19%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $25k → 19%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $25k → 19%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $25k → 19%MARJAREE MASON CENTER: $100k → 19%MARJAREE MASON CENTER: $100k → 19%MARJAREE MASON CENTER: $50k → 19%MARJAREE MASON CENTER: $25k → 19%MARJAREE MASON CENTER: $25k → 19%MARJAREE MASON CENTER: $25k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 14 repeat orgs$671k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$3.2M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
-21%

Still filing today

64%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $611k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VC
    VALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    6× · 2017–2022 · $600k · revenue +76%
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $600k · revenue +22%
  • MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $325k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -21%
  • UT
    UCSF THE CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • CS
    California State University Fresno
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Valley Children's Healthcare

To support health care activities and programs for the benefit of, and to provide health care services to, children and adults in central california with diseases, disorders and other health problems of pediatric origin, and to enhance the…

Health
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
4
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
5
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
7
Children's Specialty Care Coalition

To ensure that children with complex health care needs have access to timely and high quality medical care, and that pediatric specialists are able to thrive in californias health care

Community Improvement
8
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
9
Uc Santa Cruz Foundation

To benefit the university of california santa cruz.

Education
10
Valley Presbyterian Hospital Foundation

To render aid and obtain and administer funds and other property to be used in furtherance of the purposes of valley presbyterian hospital.

—
11
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
12
Contra Costa Regional Health Foundation

Contra Costa Regional Health Foundation eliminates barriers and enhances the capabilities of Contra Costa Health Services and the community to improve the saftey, health, and wellness of every Contra Costa County resident.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Hospitals of Central California Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Buchanan Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

3 Angels Broadcasting Network: $900,000 · Other3 Angels Broadcasting NetworkFRIENDS OF CLOVIS SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER: $501,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF CLOVIS SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTERClovis Community Hospital: $400,000 · OtherClovis Community Hospital+6 more: $69,019 · OtherVALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $600,000 · HealthVALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITALCOMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION: $600,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNI…VALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $200,000 · HealthVALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION+1 more: $10,000 · HealthMARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $325,000 · Human ServicesMARJAREE MAS…Break the Barriers Inc: $120,000 · Human ServicesBreak the Ba…Poverello House: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterGracebound Inc: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationBUCHANAN FOUNDATION: $13,000 · EducationTHE CALIFORNIA 9-11 MEMORIAL: $31,000 · Arts & CultureSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $20,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,870,019Health$1,410,000Human Services$445,000Housing & Shelter$105,000Education$38,000Arts & Culture$31,000Recreation & Sports$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $600,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION: $600,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetMARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $325,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBreak the Barriers Inc: $120,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetPoverello House: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA 9-11 MEMORIAL: $31,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBUCHANAN FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetGracebound Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Break the Barriers Inc ↗
  • Who funds Poverello House ↗
  • Who funds THE CALIFORNIA 9-11 MEMORIAL ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds BUCHANAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds Gracebound Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rotary Club of Fresno FoundationCA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rotary Club of Fresno Foundation · Leon S Peters Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Smittcamp Family Foundation · Isnardi Foundation · The Fansler Foundation · Gl Bruno Family Foundation · Valley Children's Hospital · Briscoe Family Foundation · Educational Employees Credit Union · Living Legacy Foundation · United Way California Capital Region

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carl and Lulu Mitchell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carl and Lulu Mitchell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carl and Lulu Mitchell Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph