Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Cares Nys Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$833k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.

Philanthropy$2.9MReligion$835kHuman Services$353kHealth$224kFood & Nutrition$137kEducation$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $215k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $587k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP HASC$200,000
DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND$110,000
ICHUD MOSDOS HACHINUCH$100,000
OUR PLACE$66,822
REB SHAYALES KITCHEN$60,000
MY EXTENDED FAMILY$50,000
CHILD LIFE SOCIETY INC$45,000
ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY$32,800
CHAIM V'CHESSED$30,000
KEREN ZERAH KODESH INC$30,000
KEREN EZER LNEFESH$30,000
KHAL BNEI AVROHOM YAAKOV INC$25,000
MERKAZ HAGEULA$11,800
BONEI OLAM$10,000
LINKS FAMILY$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $341k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $110k → 6%UNITED JEWISH COUNCIL OF THE EAST SIDE: $5k → 17%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $59k → 6%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $100k → 20%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $50k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $10k → 20%LINKS FAMILY: $8k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$628k · 5 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
11

Total granted

$628k
$3.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
-7%

Still filing today

60%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $516k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesReligionHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DM
    DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $169k · revenue +5%
  • ME
    MY EXTENDED FAMILY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $150k · revenue +13%
  • CL
    CHILD LIFE SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $145k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • CY
    CHEVRA-KADISHA YERUSHALAYIM INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2.8M · revenue -67% · 33% of their budget
  • CC
    CHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue -7%
  • R
    RCCS
    one grant, 2023 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc

Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations

—
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
Chasdei Yetev Lev Inc

Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.

—
4
Zichron Tzvi Elimelech

Assists thousands of needy individuals, families and multiplecharities in Israel and North America.

—
5
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
6
Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund
Philanthropy
7
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
9
Yeshivat Leluv of Jerusalem Inc

Charitable work to help people in need

—
10
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Zicron Eliyahu Inc
—
12
Zocher Chasdai Ovos

Jewish Observance of Shabbos, Chagim, Torah Learning

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rofeh Cholim Cancer Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Reb Shayalas Kitchen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%12%<5yr15%8%5–10yr21%19%10–20yr22%39%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr9%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr15%8%5–10yr21%3%10–20yr22%81%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr9%0%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%1/27
the rest of the field
11%
4,238/39,675

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
5/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHEVRA-KADISHA YERUSHALAYIM INC — $2,845,000 · PhilanthropyCHEVRA-KADISHA YERUSHALAYIM INC+1 more — $32,800 · PhilanthropyICHUD MOSDOS HACHINUCH IN BROOKLYN — $150,000 · OtherICHUD MOSDO…RCCS — $100,000 · OtherRCCSGEMACH HATZOLAH CORP — $36,000 · OtherGEMACH HATZ…KEREN ZERAH KODESH INC — $30,000 · OtherKEREN ZERAH…KEREN EZER LNEFESH — $30,000 · OtherKEREN EZER …CHAIM V'CHESSED — $30,000 · OtherCHAIM V'CHE…KHAL BNEI AVROHOM YAAKOV INC — $25,000 · OtherKHAL BNEI A…FRANKEL FUND LLC — $18,400 · Other+9 more — $43,800 · Other+9 moreCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $200,000 · ReligionCHOFETZ CH…CAMP HASC INC — $200,000 · ReligionCAMP HASC …+1 more — $13,500 · ReligionDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC — $168,610 · Human ServicesMY EXTENDED FAMILY INC — $150,000 · Human Services+3 more — $22,500 · Human ServicesCHILD LIFE SOCIETY INC — $145,000 · HealthKEREN EZER LNEFESH — $30,000 · Health+1 more — $5,000 · HealthReb Shayalas Kitchen — $60,000 · Food & NutritionTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC — $10,500 · Food & NutritionOUR PLACE INC — $66,822 · Youth DevelopmentTHE FROM THE HEART FUND — $8,000 · Housing & Shelter
Philanthropy$2,877,800Other$463,200Religion$413,500Human Services$341,110Health$180,000Food & Nutrition$70,500Youth Development$66,822Housing & Shelter$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHEVRA-KADISHA YERUSHALAYIM INC — $2,845,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCAMP HASC INC — $200,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC — $168,610 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMY EXTENDED FAMILY INC — $150,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetCHILD LIFE SOCIETY INC — $145,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetReb Shayalas Kitchen — $60,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC — $32,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN ZERAH KODESH INC — $30,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetKEREN EZER LNEFESH — $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetZICHRON ELIYAHU INC — $13,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC — $10,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBonei Olam Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FROM THE HEART FUND — $8,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetLinks Family Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED JEWISH COUNCIL OF THE EAST SIDE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJewish Communal FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…Md Friedman Family Fo…Associated Jewish Cha…The Levitin Family Ch…The Weiskopf Family F…Eisenberg Family Foun…The Basch Family Foun…Zichron Yechiel Meche…The Jimmy and Berta K…Bodner Family Foundat…
The Ojc FundNY28.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Md Friedman Family Foundation · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · The Levitin Family Charitable Trust · The Weiskopf Family Foundation · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · The Basch Family Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Bodner Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cares Nys Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home