· Public charity
Capital Area Substance Abuse Council Inc
To reduce the incidence of substance abuse in the North Central CT Region through research, planning, advocacy and coordination within each town and for the entire region
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k7 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $32k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Town of Newington | $11,163 |
| Town of Windsor | $10,842 |
| Town of Farmington | $10,342 |
| Town of Avon | $9,153 |
| City of Hartford | $8,973 |
| Town of Granby | $8,020 |
| Town of Canton | $8,020 |
| Town of West Hartford | $7,142 |
| Town of Simsbury | $5,342 |
| Town of Wethersfield | $5,342 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- COCITY OF HARTFORD2× · 2017–2018 · $18k
- NHNEWINGTON HUMAN SERVICES2× · 2017–2018 · $17k
- TOTOWN OF WINDSOR2× · 2017–2018 · $16k
Funded once
- TOTOWN OF AVONone grant, 2018 · $9k
- TOTOWN OF GRANBYone grant, 2018 · $8k
- TOTown of Cantonone grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2018.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2018, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amplify Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Center for Technology and Civic Life · North Central Area Agency on Aging · The Hometown Foundation Inc
How this is measured
Play a game based on Capital Area Substance Abuse Council’s filings →