Skip to content

· Public charity

Cape Cod Baseball League Inc

Please see 990 page 1 part I line 1.

$303k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$1.4M
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$30,336
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOURNE ATHLETIC ASSOC DBA BOURNE BRAVES$32,345
ORLEANS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC DBA ORLEAN FIREBIRDS$31,679
BREWSTER BASEBALL CLUB INC DBA BREWSTER WHITECAPS$31,290
COTUIT ATHLETIC ASSOC DBA COTUIT KETTLEERS$30,336
FALMOUTH BASEBALL CLUB INC DBA FALMOUTH COMMODORES$30,336
HARWICH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC DBA HARWICH MARINERS$30,335
YARMOUTH-DENNIS RED SOX BASEBALL CLUB$30,335
HYANNIS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC DBA HYANNIS HARBOR HAWKS$30,335
CHATHAM ATHLETIC ASSOC DBA CHATHAM ANGLERS$28,226
WAREHAM ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CORP DBA WAREHAM GATEMAN$27,285
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%YARMOUTH-DENNIS RED SOX BASEBALL CLUB: $40k → 8%WAREHAM ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CORP DBA WAREHAM GATEMAN: $35k → 8%YARMOUTH-DENNIS RED SOX BASEBALL CLUB: $30k → 8%WAREHAM ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CORP DBA WAREHAM GATEMAN: $27k → 8%YARMOUTH-DENNIS RED SOX BASEBALL CLUB: $13k → 8%WAREHAM ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CORP DBA WAREHAM GATEMAN: $14k → 8%YARMOUTH-DENNIS RED SOX BASEBALL CLUB: $12k → 8%WAREHAM ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CORP DBA WAREHAM GATEMAN: $14k → 8%YARMOUTH-DENNIS RED SOX BASEBALL CLUB: $11k → 8%WAREHAM ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CORP DBA WAREHAM GATEMAN: $11k → 8%FALMOUTH BASEBALL CLUB INC DBA FALMOUTH COMMODORES: $32k → 8%FALMOUTH BASEBALL CLUB INC DBA FALMOUTH COMMODORES: $30k → 8%FALMOUTH BASEBALL CLUB INC DBA FALMOUTH COMMODORES: $26k → 8%FALMOUTH BASEBALL CLUB INC DBA FALMOUTH COMMODORES: $14k → 8%FALMOUTH BASEBALL CLUB INC DBA FALMOUTH COMMODORES: $11k → 8%HYANNIS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC DBA HYANNIS HARBOR HAWKS: $30k → 8%HYANNIS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC DBA HYANNIS HARBOR HAWKS: $16k → 8%HYANNIS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC DBA HYANNIS HARBOR HAWKS: $14k → 8%HYANNIS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC DBA HYANNIS HARBOR HAWKS: $14k → 8%BOURNE ATHLETIC ASSOC DBA BOURNE BRAVES: $39k → 8%BOURNE ATHLETIC ASSOC DBA BOURNE BRAVES: $32k → 8%BOURNE ATHLETIC ASSOC DBA BOURNE BRAVES: $15k → 8%BOURNE ATHLETIC ASSOC DBA BOURNE BRAVES: $14k → 8%BOURNE ATHLETIC ASSOC DBA BOURNE BRAVES: $11k → 8%CHATHAM ATHLETIC ASSOC DBA CHATHAM ANGLERS: $45k → 8%CHATHAM ATHLETIC ASSOC DBA CHATHAM ANGLERS: $28k → 8%CHATHAM ATHLETIC ASSOC DBA CHATHAM ANGLERS: $14k → 8%CHATHAM ATHLETIC ASSOC DBA CHATHAM ANGLERS: $13k → 8%CHATHAM ATHLETIC ASSOC DBA CHATHAM ANGLERS: $11k → 8%ORLEANS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC DBA ORLEAN FIREBIRDS: $32k → 8%ORLEANS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC DBA ORLEAN FIREBIRDS: $31k → 8%ORLEANS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC DBA ORLEAN FIREBIRDS: $14k → 8%ORLEANS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC DBA ORLEAN FIREBIRDS: $13k → 8%HARWICH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC DBA HARWICH MARINERS: $36k → 8%HARWICH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC DBA HARWICH MARINERS: $30k → 8%HARWICH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC DBA HARWICH MARINERS: $25k → 8%HARWICH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC DBA HARWICH MARINERS: $13k → 8%COTUIT ATHLETIC ASSOC DBA COTUIT KETTLEERS: $31k → 8%COTUIT ATHLETIC ASSOC DBA COTUIT KETTLEERS: $30k → 8%COTUIT ATHLETIC ASSOC DBA COTUIT KETTLEERS: $13k → 8%COTUIT ATHLETIC ASSOC DBA COTUIT KETTLEERS: $12k → 8%CAPE COD BASEBALL LEAGUE FOUNDATION INC: $80k → 8%CAPE COD BASEBALL LEAGUE FOUNDATION INC: $12k → 8%BREWSTER BASEBALL CLUB INC DBA BREWSTER WHITECAPS: $32k → 8%BREWSTER BASEBALL CLUB INC DBA BREWSTER WHITECAPS: $31k → 8%BREWSTER BASEBALL CLUB INC DBA BREWSTER WHITECAPS: $14k → 8%BREWSTER BASEBALL CLUB INC DBA BREWSTER WHITECAPS: $13k → 8%BREWSTER BASEBALL CLUB INC DBA BREWSTER WHITECAPS: $11k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$1.4M
$0

Still filing today

82%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HARWICH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $138k · revenue +55%
  • FB
    FALMOUTH BASEBALL CLUB INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $138k · revenue +20%
  • CA
    CHATHAM ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $135k · revenue +26%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Wareham Gatemen Baseball Inc
    Recreation & Sports
    2
    Wareham Girls Softball

    Town Girls Softball league, consisting of approximately 100 girls who play between April and October.

    Recreation & Sports
    3
    Hamptons Collegiate Baseball League Inc

    To organize, establish and maintain a summer collegiate baseball league; to organize and conduct baseball games and tournaments; to provide instructional activities in baseball; to promote, foster and encourage sportsmanship, character…

    Recreation & Sports
    4
    Baseball in the Berkshires Inc
    Human Services
    5
    Hampden Youth Baseball Association

    Little league baseball

    —
    6
    Cape Cod Senior Babe Ruth Inc

    To provide a place to practice and play baseball games for about 225 young men ages 15-19 in Cape Cod MA

    Recreation & Sports
    7
    Marauders Baseball Club

    Youth Baseball league

    —
    8
    Swampscott Youth Baseball Inc

    Amateur Athletic Organization

    Recreation & Sports
    9
    Delta Islanders Baseball Club
    —
    10
    New England Collegiate Baseball League Inc

    Manage a non-profit summer collegiate baseball franchise of the New England Collegiate Baseball League to provide athletic opportunities in our community and fan engagement

    —
    11
    Greater Hartford Twilight Baseball League
    Recreation & Sports
    12
    Falmouth Youth Baseball League Inc

    Provide youth baseball program

    Recreation & Sports
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cotuit Athletic Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yarmouth Dennis Red Sox Baseball Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    6
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/10
    Grantees still filing
    9/10
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    FALMOUTH BASEBALL CLUB INC: $137,500 · Recreation & SportsFALMOUTH BASEBALL CLUB INCCHATHAM ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $134,717 · Recreation & SportsCHATHAM ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INCYARMOUTH DENNIS RED SOX BASEBALL CLUB INC: $129,158 · Recreation & SportsYARMOUTH DENNIS RED SOX BASEBALL CLUB INCORLEANS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $124,234 · Recreation & SportsORLEANS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INCCOTUIT ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $119,849 · Recreation & SportsCOTUIT ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INCCAPE COD BASEBALL LEAGUE FOUNDATION INC: $92,000 · Recreation & SportsCAPE COD BASEBALL LEAGUE FOUNDATION INCHARWICH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $138,216 · OtherHARWICH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INCBOURNE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $133,941 · OtherBOURNE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INCTHE BREWSTER BASEBALL CLUB INC: $125,062 · OtherTHE BREWSTER BASEBALL CLUB INCWAREHAM ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CORP: $124,674 · OtherWAREHAM ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CORPHYANNIS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC DBA HYANNIS HARBOR HAWKS: $109,033 · OtherHYANNIS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC DBA HYANNIS HARBOR …
    Recreation & Sports$737,458Other$630,926

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARWICH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $138,216 over 8y, 20% of budgetFALMOUTH BASEBALL CLUB INC: $137,500 over 8y, 16% of budgetCHATHAM ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $134,717 over 8y, 14% of budgetBOURNE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $133,941 over 8y, 77% of budgetYARMOUTH DENNIS RED SOX BASEBALL CLUB INC: $129,158 over 8y, 17% of budgetTHE BREWSTER BASEBALL CLUB INC: $125,062 over 8y, 11% of budgetORLEANS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $124,234 over 8y, 7.7% of budgetCOTUIT ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $119,849 over 8y, 6.1% of budgetCAPE COD BASEBALL LEAGUE FOUNDATION INC: $92,000 over 2y, 97% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds HARWICH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
    • Who funds FALMOUTH BASEBALL CLUB INC ↗
    • Who funds CHATHAM ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
    • Who funds BOURNE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
    • Who funds YARMOUTH DENNIS RED SOX BASEBALL CLUB INC ↗
    • Who funds THE BREWSTER BASEBALL CLUB INC ↗
    • Who funds WAREHAM ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CORP ↗
    • Who funds ORLEANS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
    • Who funds COTUIT ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
    • Who funds CAPE COD BASEBALL LEAGUE FOUNDATION INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Cape Cod Baseball League Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cape Cod Baseball League Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      9get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Cape Cod Baseball League’s filings →

      More from the funding graph