Skip to content

· Private foundation

Candor Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$424k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.3MArts & Culture$132kAnimals$28kHealth$16kSocial Science$15k
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $253k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$11,366
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROC DEMOCRATIC SCHOOL ASSOC LO CHIH$65,000
FU JEN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY$60,000
ASSOCIATION OF PING-TUNG INDIGENOUS$36,913
INFINITE FUTURE FOUNDATION$33,000
NATIONAL DONG HWA UNIVERSITY$28,383
NPO TAITUNG COUNTY SOUTH LINK$26,180
FENG CHIA UNIVERSITY$18,932
KID'S BOOKHOUSE FOUNDATION$15,621
TAITUNG COUNTY FENG TIAN JR HIGH SC$15,621
NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY$11,366
TAMKANG UNIVERSITY$11,366
CHINESE CULTURE UNIVERSITY$11,366
NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY$11,366
NATIONAL ILAN UNIVERSITY$11,366
NO 401 NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY$11,366
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 2% of grant dollars ($58k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 98% that went abroad ($2.4M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FISTULA FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%TAITUNG COUNTY LIJIA ELEMENTARY SCH: $10k → 9%ASSOCIATION OF PING-TUNG INDIGENOUS: $59k → 14%KUNG TUNG TECHNICAL SENIOR HIGH SCH: $13k → 9%ASPCA: $5k → 17%COUNCIL FOR RESEARCH IN VALUES AND: $5k → 14%NATIONAL DONG HWA UNIVERSITY: $28k → 15%NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY: $11k → 11%NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY: $18k → 9%NATIONAL ILAN UNIVERSITY: $11k → 12%TAMKANG UNIVERSITY: $19k → 19%FISTULA FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%ASSOCIATION OF PING-TUNG INDIGENOUS: $37k → 14%ASPCA: $4k → 17%COUNCIL FOR RESEARCH IN VALUES AND: $5k → 14%NATIONAL DONG HWA UNIVERSITY: $26k → 15%NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY: $11k → 11%NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY: $13k → 9%TAMKANG UNIVERSITY: $11k → 19%FISTULA FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%THE TREVOR PROJECT: $4k → 14%COUNCIL FOR RESEARCH IN VALUES AND: $5k → 14%NATIONAL DONG HWA UNIVERSITY: $16k → 15%NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY: $11k → 11%NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY: $11k → 9%TAMKANG UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%WAGS AND WALKS LOS ANGELES: $5k → 14%ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%NATIONAL DONG HWA UNIVERSITY: $13k → 15%NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 9%ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $4k → 14%NATIONAL DONG HWA UNIVERSITY: $11k → 15%NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 9%NATIONAL DONG HWA UNIVERSITY: $11k → 15%NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY: $9k → 11%NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY: $9k → 9%NATIONAL DONG HWA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 15%NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY: $7k → 11%NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY: $7k → 9%NATIONAL DONG HWA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 15%NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 98% of all-years giving ($2.4M)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Taiwan$2.1M · 120 grants
China$195k · 2 grants
OC$62k · 6 grants
Hong Kong$49k · 9 grants
Canada$25k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 28 repeat orgs$204k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
11

Total granted

$2.3M
$134k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+2%

Still filing today

11%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF PING-TUNG INDIGENOUS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $323k
  • FJ
    FU JEN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $261k
  • GZ
    GUI ZHOU YOUTH DEVELOPMENT
    2× · 2017–2018 · $195k

Funded once

  • CH
    CHINESE HSING CHIAN THINKBANK ASSOC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • NT
    NATIONAL TAITUNG SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASSOCIATION OF PING-TUNG INDIGENOUS: $323,132 · OtherASSOCIATION OF PING-TUNG INDIGENOUSFU JEN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY: $260,650 · OtherFU JEN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITYGUI ZHOU YOUTH DEVELOPMENT: $194,500 · OtherGUI ZHOU YOUTH DEVELOPMENTNPO TAITUNG COUNTY SOUTH LINK: $144,523 · OtherNPO TAITUNG COUNTY SOUTH LINKINFINITE FUTURE FOUNDATION: $132,000 · OtherINFINITE FUTURE FOUNDATIONNATIONAL DONG HWA UNIVERSITY: $125,374 · OtherFENG CHIA UNIVERSITY: $108,574 · OtherNATIONAL ILAN UNIVERSITY: $93,431 · OtherNO 401 NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY: $85,938 · OtherNATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY: $84,299 · OtherNATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY: $81,436 · Other+26 more: $804,126 · Other+26 moreANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $13,750 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $8,750 · AnimalsThe Fistula Foundation: $11,750 · HealthTREVOR PROJECT INC: $3,750 · Civil Rights
Other$2,437,983Animals$22,500Health$11,750Civil Rights$3,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $13,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $11,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $8,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $3,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Candor Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Candor Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Candor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph