Skip to content

· Private foundation

Canda Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$5kRecreation & Sports$3kHousing & Shelter$3kArts & Culture$500Education$500Health$500Youth Development$500Civil Rights$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$200k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
National Links Trust$2,000
Waynesboro Family YMCA$1,000
Island Housing Trust$1,000
Gold Star Spouses of the United States$1,000
Pension Rights Center$1,000
Farm Neck Foundation$500
DC Diaper Bank$500
Comfort Cases$500
Clayborn Temple$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Cure Epilepsy$500
Natl Immigration Law Ctr$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Avalon Theater$500
I Support Girls$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Waynesboro Family YMCA: $1k → 9%Waynesboro Family YMCA: $1k → 8%Comfort Cases: $500 → 8%DC Diaper Bank: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
CA
VA
MD
DE
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7k · 3 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
12

Total granted

$7k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
-1%

Still filing today

100%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NL
    NATIONAL LINKS TRUST
    4× · 2022–2025 · $3k · revenue +50%
  • IH
    ISLAND HOUSING TRUST CORPORATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +71%
  • YO
    YMCA OF WAYNESBORO VA INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • PR
    Pension Rights Center
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1k · revenue -17%
  • GS
    Gold Star Spouses of the United States
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2025 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
2
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
3
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
4
Westminster Canterbury On Chesapeake Bay Foundation

To support the mission of westminster-canterbury on chesapeake bay

Health
5
Westminster Canterbury On Chesapeake Bay

See schedule othe mission of westminster-canterbury on chesapeake bay is to establish, provide, maintain, operate, manage, control, or regulate one or more health care or residential services for older adults, including providing services…

Human Services
6
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
7
Center for Global Development

Reduce global poverty and improve lives through innovative economic research that drives better policy and practice by the world's top decision makers. we focus on the intersection of developing countries and the governments, institutions…

Human Services
8
CureCervicalCancer

Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.

International
9
National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care Inc

To enable the access and choice of america's seniors in their housing and care by providing data, analytics and connections that bring together investors and providers in the sector.

Human Services
10
The Georgia Center for Nonprofits

Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…

Community Improvement
11
Center for Arms Control and

A nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to enhancing international peace and security in the 21st century, thereby retaining its focus on nuclear weapons but expanding to include other present emerging security threats.

International
12
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Immigration Law Center; the most unlike its peers is Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YMCA OF WAYNESBORO VA INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF WAYNESBORO VA IN…GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $500 · Human ServicesGREATER DC DIAPER BANKCOMFORT CASES INC: $500 · Human ServicesCOMFORT CASES INCGold Star Spouses of the United States: $1,000 · OtherGold Star Spouses of the…Individual grant recipient: $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…I Support Girls: $500 · OtherI Support GirlsIndividual grant recipient: $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…Avalon Theater: $500 · OtherAvalon TheaterNATIONAL LINKS TRUST: $2,800 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL LINKS TRUSTISLAND HOUSING TRUST CORPORATION: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterISLAND HOUSING T…Pension Rights Center: $1,000 · Civil RightsPension Righ…NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $500 · Civil RightsNATIONAL IMM…Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $500 · HealthThe Big We: $500 · Community ImprovementFARM NECK FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Philanthropy
Human Services$3,000Other$3,000Arts & Culture$2,800Housing & Shelter$2,000Civil Rights$1,500Health$500Community Improvement$500Philanthropy$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL LINKS TRUST: $2,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND HOUSING TRUST CORPORATION: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF WAYNESBORO VA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMFORT CASES INC: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFARM NECK FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Canda Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Canda Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Island Housing Trust Corporation: 1% of income from government
  • Comfort Cases Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Canda’s filings →

More from the funding graph