How much did CAMPION ADVOCACY FUND grant in FY2024?

CAMPION ADVOCACY FUND reported 9 grants totaling $3,704,500 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is CAMPION ADVOCACY FUND based?

CAMPION ADVOCACY FUND is based in WA.

CAMPION ADVOCACY FUND

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

CAMPION ADVOCACY FUND

We advocate for access to housing as a way to end homelessness and (continued on schedule o)conservation of public lands as a solution to the climate crisis.

$3.7M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$2.5M

Largest

01What you fund

0171% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Civil Rights$3.0MEnvironment$487kHousing & Shelter$446kAnimals$75kHuman Services$56kPublic Benefit$50kCrime & Legal$50kCommunity Improvement$8kOther$1.7M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

wildaction

2021

peoplestaxpayersvoicewayscausesprotectpolicy

2023

seniorsyeshealthveteransresilientstabilitysystem

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$50k–250k2 grants · $300k
$250k+4 grants · $3.3M

$200,000

Median grant

States reached

$28M

Total assets

Largest grants

LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS$2,544,500
ALASKA WILDERNESS ACTION$300,000
SENATE MAJORITY PAC$250,000
STRATEGIC VICTORY FUND$250,000
HOUSING ACTION FUND$200,000
DEFEND WASHINGTON$100,000
TRUMAN FUND$25,000
KENNEDY FUND$25,000
WASHINGTON HOUSING ACTION FUND$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.9M · 4 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +88% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.9M

$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%

+20%

Still filing today

100%

92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $660k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EnvironmentCivil RightsHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

LO
LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS
3× · 2022–2024 · $2.9M · revenue +388%
WH
WASHINGTON HOUSING ALLIANCE ACTION FUND
7× · 2017–2024 · $446k · revenue +88% · 39% of their budget
TM
THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY
4× · 2019–2022 · $56k · revenue +34%

Funded once

AW
ALASKA WILDERNESS ACTION
one grant, 2017 · $898k
NW
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATIONgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +87%
SC
SIERRA CLUB
one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue +20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Rainforest Action Network

Our mission is to preserve forests, protect the climate and uphold human rights by challenging corporate power and systemic injustice through frontline partnerships and strategic campaigns.

Environment

Wra Action Fund

The mission of the WRA Action Fund is to advance solutions to climate change and its impacts.

—

Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses science, communications, and strategic advocacy to protect forests and our climate future.

Environment

Nw Energy Coalition

NWEC leads a broad alliance advancing affordable, equitable clean energy. We envision a carbon-free system providing reliable energy, restoring natural resources, protecting salmon, supporting communities, and prioritizing decarbonization,…

—

350 Wisconsin Action Inc

350 Wisconsin Action mobilizes concerned climate voters to push for bold climate action from government and elected officials. We keep the climate crisis at the center of the political conversation, and push for progressive policies that…

Environment

350 New Hampshire

350NH is a multigenerational movement working to advance a just transition to a renewable energy economy and an end to our society's dependence on fossil fuels. We are building the movement for climate justice and working for local and…

Environment

Clean Future Action Fund Inc

To educate, lobby and advocate for policies that will meaningfully address climate change.

Environment

Southeast Alaska Conservation Council

SEACC's mission is to protect the special places of the world's largest temperate rainforest, promote conservation, and advocate for sustainability in human use of natural resources. Inspired by the land, wildlife, cultures, and…

Environment

Western Way Action

Providing leadership on environmental and conservation issues.

—

Maine Climate Action Now

MCAN catalyzes transformative education and action in response to the climate and ecological emergency. We seek to honor, unite and amplify the voices of youth, frontline communities, and others historically excluded from the climate…

Environment

National Wildlife Federation Action Fund

To provide the tools and resources that enable people from all walks of life and political stripes to elevate their voices and become champions for wildlife and the wild places they call home.

Environment

The Alliance for Collective Action

To bring people together to develop and advance solutions for an inclusive, regenerative future.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Earthjustice Action and the most unlike its peers is Third Sector New England Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/19

Grantees still filing

12/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Civil Rights$2,954,500Other$1,731,164Environment$486,595Housing & Shelter$446,488Animals$75,000Human Services$56,000Public Benefit$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Advocacy Action Fund IncCA16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Advocacy Action Fund Inc · Nrdc Action Fund Inc · The Partnership Project Inc · Energy Action Fund · Sixteen Thirty Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CAMPION ADVOCACY FUND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WASHINGTON HOUSING ALLIANCE ACTION FUND.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~7 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +88% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 911571989 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WASHINGTON HOUSING ALLIANCE ACTION FUND, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 39% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Campion Advocacy Fund?

Find your warmest path to Campion Advocacy Fund through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CAMPION ADVOCACY FUND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Campion Advocacy Fund?

More from the funding graph

CAMPION ADVOCACY FUND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Campion Advocacy Fund?

More from the funding graph