Skip to content

· Private foundation

Calvin W and Julia B Howard Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$13k
Granted FY2023
17
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Crime & Legal$33kHealth$23kFood & Nutrition$11kEducation$8kReligion$5kAnimals$5kHuman Services$4kArts & Culture$4kOther$0
02FY2023 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$700
Median grant
3
States reached
$320k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMANCE CO$2,000
CROSSROADS SEXUAL ASSUALT RESPONSE$2,000
FAMILY ABUSE SERVICES OF$1,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$1,000
RESIDENTAL TREATMENT SERVICES$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ALAMANCE CITIZENS FOR A DRUG FREE$700
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CH$700
DEGA MOBILE VETERINARY CARE$500
ALAMANCE ARTS$500
CONNECT 4 FAITH$500
ANTIOCH BAPTIST CHURCH$500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$308
SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $308 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $308 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $308 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $300 → 14%SOUTHERN ALAMANCE FAMILY EMPOWERMEN: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$86k · 21 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
16

Total granted

$86k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+53%

Still filing today

24%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    PIEDMONT RESCUE MISSION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +24%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2019–2021 · $2k · revenue +44%
  • SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $1k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • AC
    ALAMANCE COUNT SHERIFF DEPT
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF GRAHAM PARKS AND
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Charlotte Inc

Humane Society of Charlotte mission is to champion the wellbeing of companion animals and strengthen their bond with the people who know, love, and need them.

Animals
2
Nc Dog Rescue Organization
—
3
Aspca Veterinary Services of North Carolina Pc

Aspca veterinary services of north carolina, p.c. is a professional corporation that provides the veterinary services of qualified, licensed veterinarians exclusively to the aspca in north carolina. these services include the veterinary…

Animals
4
The Animal Protection Society of Durham

The aps of durham is a leader in building lifelong bonds between people and animals through education, community outreach, and the provision of care for animals in need.

Animals
5
Spay Neuter Charlotte

The organization stands for every pet and pet owner by making the highest quality veterinary care and spay neuter services affordable and accessible, with the goal of reducing the number of dogs and cats euthanized in regional shelters and…

Animals
6
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
7
Safe Haven for Cats

The mission of safe haven for cats is to use no-kill principles and education to save cats' lives through rescue, adoption, spay/neuter services and community programs.

Animals
8
Humane Society of Davie County

The humane societys misison is to prevent cruelty and suffering among dogs and cats through rescue, adoption, and education.

Animals
9
Spca of Northeastern North Carolina

The organization provides shelter for homeless, abused, and abandoned animals. the shelter also provides an opportunity for adoption of these animals

Animals
10
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
11
Albemarle Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

To advance the humane treatment of dogs and cats by providing comprehensive sheltering, medical care, and behavioral support. we strive to ensure every animal has the opportunity to find a permanent, loving home through community education…

Animals
12
Spay Neuter Assistance Program of North Carolina

To address pet overpopulation in our state by offering high quality, low cost spay-neuter surgeries for pets belonging to north carolina families in need.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cone Health Philanthropic Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Dega Mobile Veterinary Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CROSSROADS SEXUAL ASSUALT RESPONSE: $28,500 · OtherCROSSROADS SEXUAL ASSUALT RESPONSERESIDENTAL TREATMENT SERVICES: $14,900 · OtherRESIDENTAL TREATMENT SERVICESMEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMANCE CO: $10,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMANCE COIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALAMANCE COUNT SHERIFF DEPT: $3,975 · Other+28 more: $32,424 · Other+28 moreWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,224 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP ADULT DAY SERVICES INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesSAFE INC: $500 · Human ServicesDUKE UNIVERSITY: $2,100 · EducationAnimal Protection Society of the: $1,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF ALAMANCE COUNTY: $500 · AnimalsDEGA Mobile Veterinary Care: $500 · AnimalsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,250 · HealthNATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC: $600 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$95,799Human Services$2,724Education$2,100Animals$2,000Health$1,250Public Safety & Disaster$600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPIEDMONT RESCUE MISSION INC: $2,249 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $2,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,224 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONE HEALTH PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Protection Society of the: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDSHIP ADULT DAY SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF ALAMANCE COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAFE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PIEDMONT RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CONE HEALTH PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Animal Protection Society of the ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP ADULT DAY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF ALAMANCE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds DEGA Mobile Veterinary Care ↗
  • Who funds SAFE INC ↗
  • Who funds COTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA2.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Calvin W and Julia B Howard Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Calvin W and Julia B Howard Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Calvin W and Julia B Howard Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph