Skip to content

· Private foundation

Callner Milton H Fndtn Xxxxx4008

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2026still arriving
18
Grants FY2026still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

52% of Callner Milton H Fndtn Xxxxx4008’s FY2026 grant dollars went to American Society For Technion - Israel Institute For Technology Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2026 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’18
7
’19
7
’20
5
’21
7
’22
8
’23
9
’24
9
’25
9
’26

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2026.

Science & Tech$225kEducation$132kReligion$65kYouth Development$45kHealth$31kArts & Culture$27kPhilanthropy$20kHousing & Shelter$15kOther$0
02FY2026 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k16 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$2,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY$25,000
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$3,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$3,000
HADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST$3,000
CORNELIUS EARLY SCHOLARS$2,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,500
NATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB FOUNDATION$2,500
TEMPLE KOL TIKVAH$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ANSHE EMET SYNAGOGUE$1,000
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC: $6k → 11%AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY: $25k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $3k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $3k → 10%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC: $6k → 11%AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY: $25k → 17%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC: $6k → 11%AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY: $25k → 17%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC: $6k → 11%AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY: $25k → 17%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC: $5k → 11%AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY: $25k → 17%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC: $5k → 11%AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY: $25k → 17%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC: $5k → 11%AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY: $25k → 17%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC: $5k → 11%AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY: $25k → 17%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC: $5k → 11%AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY: $25k → 17%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%TEMPLE KOL TIKVAH: $12k → 10%TEMPLE KOL TIKVAH: $3k → 10%TEMPLE KOL TIKVAH: $3k → 10%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $10k → 14%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $3k → 14%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $3k → 14%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $3k → 14%HADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST: $3k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF: $5k → 14%HADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST: $3k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF: $5k → 14%HADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST: $3k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF: $5k → 14%HADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST: $3k → 14%HADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST: $3k → 14%HADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST: $3k → 14%HADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST: $3k → 14%HADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST: $3k → 14%HADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
CT
TN
NC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$307k · 20 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
0

Total granted

$307k
$0

Still filing today

40%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    9× · 2018–2026 · $27k · revenue +34%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2018–2026 · $11k · revenue +10%
  • NE
    NATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB FOUNDATION
    4× · 2023–2026 · $10k · revenue +7%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    New York Genome Center Inc

    Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

    Health
    2
    The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

    Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

    Community Improvement
    3
    Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

    Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

    Health
    4
    American College of Radiology

    The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

    Health
    5
    Asco Association

    Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

    Community Improvement
    6
    American Association of State Colleges and Universities

    Aascu is a washington, d.c. based higher education association that represents the sector of over 500 regional public colleges, universities, and systems whose members share a learning and teaching centered culture, a commitment to…

    Education
    7
    American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

    See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

    Health
    8
    Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

    We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

    Education
    9
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

    Education
    10
    American College of Surgeons

    The american college of surgeons is dedicated to improving the care of the surgical patient and to safeguarding standards of care in an optimal and ethical practice environment.

    Education
    11
    American Institute for Cancer Research

    Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

    Health
    12
    New York University

    Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Henderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/10
    Grantees still filing
    7/10
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Individual grant recipient: $49,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEMPLE KOL TIKVAH OF LAKE NORMAN: $28,853 · OtherTEMPLE KOL TIKVAH OF LAKE NORMANHADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST: $27,000 · OtherHADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONISTBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $24,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSJEWISH UNITED FUND OF: $20,000 · OtherJEWISH UNITED FUND OFBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $15,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $14,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINAIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $11,000 · OtherANSHE EMET SYNAGOGUE: $9,000 · Other+4 more: $23,000 · Other+4 moreAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $225,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL IN…BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $110,000 · EducationBRANDEIS UNIVERSITYTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $27,000 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAG…NATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationNATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB FOUN…CORNELIUS EARLY SCHOLARS: $7,500 · EducationAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $11,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,500 · Health
    Other$231,853International$225,000Education$154,500Health$30,500

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $225,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $110,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $27,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $11,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCORNELIUS EARLY SCHOLARS: $7,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
    • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
    • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
    • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
    • Who funds Henderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity ↗
    • Who funds NATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
    • Who funds CORNELIUS EARLY SCHOLARS ↗
    • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Callner Milton H Fndtn Xxxxx4008 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Callner Milton H Fndtn Xxxxx4008. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
    • Brandeis University: 8% of income from government
    • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 4% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Callner Milton H Fndtn Xxxxx4008’s filings →

    More from the funding graph