Skip to content

· Private foundation

Callis Educational Fund

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$102k
Granted FY2021
19
Grants FY2021
11
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Education$205k
02FY2021 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$6,500
Median grant
11
States reached
$445k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lipscomb University$6,500
Pratt Institutre$6,500
Western Colorado University$6,500
Tennessee Technical University$6,500
University of Mary Hardin Baylor$6,500
Henderson State University$6,500
University of Central Arkansas$6,500
Michigan Technical University$6,500
Willamette University$6,500
Texas A and M$6,500
Baylor University$6,500
University of Texas$6,500
Kankakee Community College$4,756
Emerson College$3,250
Nossi College of Art$3,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Emerson College: $7k → 16%Pratt Institute: $10k → 20%University of Texas: $7k → 10%University of Mary Hardin Baylor: $7k → 14%Baylor University: $7k → 16%Texas A and M: $10k → 22%University of Central Arkansas: $10k → 15%Henderson State University: $7k → 20%Michigan Technological University: $7k → 14%Willamette University: $7k → 14%Nossi College of Art: $3k → 14%Tennessee Technical University: $7k → 19%Chowan University: $3k → 23%Western Colorado University: $7k → 15%Indiana University: $3k → 18%Ohio Northern University: $3k → 15%Kankakee Community College: $5k → 14%Emerson College: $3k → 16%Pratt Institutre: $7k → 20%University of Mary HardinBaylor: $3k → 14%Baylor University: $7k → 16%Texas A and M: $7k → 22%University of Central Arkansas: $7k → 15%Henderson State University: $7k → 20%Michigan Technical University: $7k → 14%Willamette University: $3k → 14%Lipscomb University: $7k → 14%Tennessee Technical University: $7k → 19%Kankakee Community College: $2k → 14%Lipscomb University: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
CO
KY
AR
TN
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 13 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against -45% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$157k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
-45%

Still filing today

46%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    PRATT INSTITUTE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $16k · revenue +28%
  • BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $13k · revenue +24%
  • LU
    LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $13k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Texas at Austin
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • MT
    Michigan Technological University
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • IU
    Indiana University School of Medicine
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
3
Whitworth University

Since 1890, whitworth has held fast to its founding mission of providing "an education of mind and heart" through rigorous intellectual inquiry guided by dedicated christian scholars.

Education
4
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
5
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
6
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
7
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
10
East Texas Baptist University

East texas baptist university (etbu) was founded in 1912 as a fully accredited institution of higher education. affiliated with the baptist general convention of texas, etbu educates students by integrating biblical faith and learning to…

Education
11
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
12
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Willamette University; the most unlike its peers is Pratt Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Texas A and M: $16,250 · OtherTexas A and MUniversity of Central Arkansas: $16,250 · OtherUniversity of Central ArkansasHENDERSON STATE UNIVERSITY: $13,000 · OtherHENDERSON STATE UNIVERSITYTennessee Technical University: $13,000 · OtherTennessee Technical UniversityLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $13,000 · OtherLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITYWestern Colorado University: $13,000 · OtherWestern Colorado UniversityUniversity of Texas at Austin: $9,750 · OtherUniversity of Texas at AustinKankakee Community College: $7,022 · OtherUniversity of Tennessee Knoxville: $6,500 · OtherMichigan Technical University: $6,500 · OtherMichigan Technological University: $6,500 · OtherUniversity of Texas: $6,500 · Other+4 more: $13,000 · Other+4 morePRATT INSTITUTE: $16,250 · EducationPRATT INSTITUTEBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $13,000 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR: $9,750 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOREMERSON COLLEGE: $9,750 · EducationEMERSON COLLEGEWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $9,750 · EducationWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITYOhio Northern University: $3,250 · EducationCHOWAN UNIVERSITY: $3,250 · Education
Other$140,272Education$65,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRATT INSTITUTE: $16,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR: $9,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMERSON COLLEGE: $9,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $9,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOhio Northern University: $3,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOWAN UNIVERSITY: $3,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRATT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR ↗
  • Who funds EMERSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Ohio Northern University ↗
  • Who funds CHOWAN UNIVERSITY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Callis Educational Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Callis Educational Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Willamette University: 4% of income from government
  • Emerson College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Callis Educational’s filings →

More from the funding graph