Skip to content

· Public charity

Callaway County United Way Inc

The mission of the callaway county united way is to improve thequality of life for all of the people of callaway county.

$141k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$643kHousing & Shelter$163kArts & Culture$93kCrime & Legal$69kHealth$39kRecreation & Sports$20kEmployment$19kYouth Development$14k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $114,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $140,794 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $26,794 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $64k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$27,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$120k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SERVE INC$50,000
OUR HOUSE$27,000
CARDV$23,000
CALLAWAY SENIOR CENTER INC$14,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $662k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SERVE: $75k → 11%SERVE: $74k → 11%SERVE: $74k → 11%SERVE: $73k → 11%SERVE: $66k → 11%SERVE INC: $50k → 11%SERVE INC: $36k → 11%SERVE INC: $35k → 11%CARDV: $23k → 11%CARDV: $21k → 11%CARDV: $19k → 11%CALLAWAY SENIOR CENTER: $17k → 11%CALLAWAY SENIOR CENTER: $17k → 11%CALLAWAY SENIOR CENTER INC: $14k → 11%CALLAWAY SENIOR CENTER: $14k → 11%CALLAWAY SENIOR CENTER INC: $14k → 11%CALLAWAY SENIOR CENTER INC: $13k → 11%FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $10k → 11%CALLAWAY SENIOR CENTER: $10k → 11%FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 12 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$1.1M
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+46%

Still filing today

58%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Human ServicesEmploymentCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SERVE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $483k · revenue +43%
  • CS
    CALLAWAY SENIOR CENTERS
    7× · 2018–2025 · $98k · revenue +43%
  • TC
    THE COALITION AGAINST RAPE AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $63k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • KP
    KINGDOM PROJECTS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $19k · revenue -26%
  • SC
    SENIOR CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $18k
  • CC
    CALLAWAY COUNTY 4-H
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Missouri Valley Housing Corporation

Provide housing for elderly

Housing & Shelter
2
Perry County Services Inc

Provide support services to developmentally disabled individuals of perry county,missouri through areas of community employment, job preparation, day programs, transportation and personal assistance.

Human Services
3
Womens Crisis Center of Taney County Inc

The Crisis Center provides shelter and services to victims and their children of domestic and sexual violence.

Human Services
4
Housing Services of Kansas City Inc

The Housing Services of Kansas City, Inc is focused on creating and preserving affordable housing for low income kansas city residents.

Housing & Shelter
5
Midwest Covenant Home Inc

Nursing home care and assisted living for the elderly.

Health
6
Help Services of Carroll County

Provide services, food commodities, utility payment funds, cancer treatment funds to low-income residents of the carroll county, missouri area.

Human Services
7
Self-Advocate Coalition of Kansas Inc

Advocacy for disabled people

Health
8
Ozark Regional Share and Care

Provide basic human services such as food, clothing, shelter, medical, etc. for local people in need

Human Services
9
Victim Support Services Inc

Provide support assistance to the victims of interpersonal violence, including domestic and sexual violence, in northeast missouri.

—
10
Community Clinic of Southwest Missouri

The mission of the community clinic of southwest missouri is to improve the health of people in our community without access to medical, dental, or mental health care.

—
11
Platte Senior Services Inc

Provide meals,transportation and social interaction opportunities for senior citizens living in platte county missouri

Human Services
12
Habitat for Humanity of Nodaway County Inc

Provide affordable housing to low-income families

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compass Health Inc; the most unlike its peers is Homemaker Health Care Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SERVE INC: $483,362 · Human ServicesSERVE INCCALLAWAY SENIOR CENTERS: $98,250 · Human ServicesCALLAWAY SENIOR CENTERSTHE COALITION AGAINST RAPE AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $62,500 · Human ServicesTHE COALITION AGAINST RAPE AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE+1 more: $17,500 · Human ServicesOUR HOUSE: $122,000 · OtherOUR HOUSECARDV: $115,250 · OtherCARDVEcumencial Ministries of Callaway County Inc: $68,000 · OtherEcumencial Ministries of Callaway County IncMID MO LEGAL SERVICES: $44,000 · OtherMID MO LEGAL SERVICESHEART OF MO CASA: $39,152 · OtherHEART OF MO CASACALLAWAY 4H: $20,000 · OtherMID-MISSOURI LEGAL SERVICES: $18,500 · OtherSENIOR CENTER: $18,000 · Other+2 more: $20,450 · OtherCOMPASS HEALTH INC: $21,500 · HealthKINGDOM PROJECTS INC: $18,750 · EmploymentHEART OF MISSOURI CASA: $6,700 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$661,612Other$465,352Health$21,500Employment$18,750Crime & Legal$6,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSERVE INC: $483,362 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetCALLAWAY SENIOR CENTERS: $98,250 over 7y, 9.3% of budgetEcumencial Ministries of Callaway County Inc: $68,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetTHE COALITION AGAINST RAPE AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $62,500 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetCOMPASS HEALTH INC: $21,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKINGDOM PROJECTS INC: $18,750 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetMID-MISSOURI LEGAL SERVICES: $18,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetFAMILY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF MISSOURI CASA: $6,700 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetHOMEMAKER HEALTH CARE INC: $6,250 over 1y, 5.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CALLAWAY SENIOR CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds Ecumencial Ministries of Callaway County Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE COALITION AGAINST RAPE AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds KINGDOM PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MID-MISSOURI LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF MISSOURI CASA ↗
  • Who funds HOMEMAKER HEALTH CARE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Veterans United FoundationMO13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Veterans United Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Callaway County United Way Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Callaway County United Way Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Callaway County United Way Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Callaway County United Way Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Callaway County United Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph