Loading…
· Public charity
California Health Collaborative
Providing wellness through collaboration.
$391k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants
1
Communities
$134k
Largest
01What you fund
0185% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2023.
Arts & Culture$674kEducation$564kCivil Rights$134kHealth$72kPhilanthropy$41kOther$268k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2021
effectively respondrespond ace'stobacco-free outdoors
2022
tobacco-free outdoorseffectively respondrespond ace's
2023
covid prevention
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- $10k–50k1 grant · $41k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $350k
$109,040
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
- Valley Voices$133,688
- African American Family & Cul$109,040
- Universiry of Southern CA$106,960
- Kings United Way$40,883
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 6 repeat orgs$226k to everyone else
6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
2
Total granted
$1.5M
$51k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+21%
+182%
Still filing today
83%
50%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthArts & CultureEducationCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EAETR Associates3× · 2021–2023 · $674k · revenue +75% · 79% of their budget
- BYBarstow Youth Activity Center2× · 2021–2022 · $81k · revenue +20% · 62% of their budget
Family Healthcare Network2× · 2021–2022 · $66k · revenue +101%
Funded once
- MCMerced County Dept of Publicone grant, 2021 · $46k
- AHAria Health Community Centergraduatedone grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +182%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Adventist Health Tulare
Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.
—
2
San Joaquin Community Hospital
Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.
Health
3
Central Valley Medical Center
Hospital services.
Health
4
Ventura County Family Justice
To assist in creating a safe place for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, and elder abuse to access medical and mental health assistance, as well as law enforcement.
—
5
Community Impact Central Valley
To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.
Health
6
Feather River Tribal Health Inc
To elevate the health status of the American Indian people in our service area and all people in our communities to the highest level possible through a comprehensive system of preventive and therapeutic services.
Health
7
Castle Family Health Centers Inc
The mission of Castle Family Health Centers is to provide high quality accessible and comprehensive primary care with ancillary services, to the Atwater, Winton, and surrounding communities in a culturally and linguistically appropriate…
Health
8
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
9
Feather River Hospital
Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.
Health
10
Fresno Community Hospital
Fch&mc meets the medical needs of its community through its acute-care hospitals and facilities.
Health
11
Asian American Resource Center
The mission of the organization is to improve overall health, and educational well-being by providing informational and developmental programs to asian-americans and other ethnic groups who are low-income, isolated, vulnerable, and under…
Community Improvement
12
Sonora Community Hospital
Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Healthcare Network and the most unlike its peers is Barstow Youth Activity Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Arts & Culture$674,329Education$564,324Other$268,014Civil Rights$133,688Health$72,095Philanthropy$40,883
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ETR Associates ↗
- Who funds Universiry of Southern CA ↗
- Who funds Valley Voices ↗
- Who funds Rim Family Services Inc ↗
- Who funds Barstow Youth Activity Center ↗
- Who funds Family Healthcare Network ↗
- Who funds Adventist Health Reedley ↗
- Who funds Kings United Way ↗
- Who funds Aria Health Community Center ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation California Health Collaborative funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ETR Associates.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +75% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 462002821 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on ETR Associates, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 79% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to California Health Collaborative?
Find your warmest path to California Health Collaborative through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines