Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Cahalin Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Environment$5.2MEducation$187kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kRecreation & Sports$23kCrime & Legal$10kHealth$4kCommunity Improvement$3kFood & Nutrition$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $500
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $45k
$45,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REAL WORLD SCHOLARS$45,000
WOODLAND ELEMENTARY BOOSTERS INC$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SAN DIEGO ORANGE AND IMPERIAL COUNTIES BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%MARIPOSA COUNTY FIRE SAFE COUNCIL: $30k → 15%MERCED COLLEGE AG DIVISION: $500 → 19%YOSEMITE SOUTH GATE TRAIL COOP: $5k → 22%MT VERNON PRESBYTERIAN SCHOOL: $500 → 13%HAPPY GOAT INC: $5.2M → 11%MARIPOSA COUNTY SHERIFFS FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%YOSEMITE SOUTH GATE TRAIL COOP: $5k → 22%REAL WORLD SCHOLARS: $135k → 11%MARIPOSA FFA BOOSTERS: $6k → 15%REAL WORLD SCHOLARS: $45k → 11%FRIENDS OF THE FAIRGROUNDS FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%LITTLE LEAGUE INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 15%MANNA HOUSE OF MARIPOSA COUNTY: $5k → 15%TIER ONE TRANQUILITY BASE: $2k → 15%MARIPOSA SOCCER LEAGUE: $2k → 15%JOHN C FREMONT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%MARIPOSA FRIENDS OF THE FAIRGROUNDS: $1k → 15%MCHS GRIZZLIES BOOSTERS: $1k → 15%WOODLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $510 → 15%WOODLAND ELEMENTARY BOOSTERS INC: $500 → 15%MARIPOSA CO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $250 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Cahalin Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Cahalin Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of Mariposa County Sheriffs Search and Rescue

To provide support for search and rescue activities of mariposa county search and rescue.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Mariposa Jr Livestock Auction Committee

To promote and conduct the annual 4H/FFA/Independent Junior Livestock Auction at the Mariposa County Fair and Homecoming. The auction is held to assist 4H, FFA and Independent members learn by doing projects designed to teach fundamentals…

Food & Nutrition
3
Madera County Sheriffs Foundation

To support law enforcement in Madera Co

Human Services
4
Mariposa Rotary Fund

To provide to carry on charitable and educational activities in mariposa county.

Education
5
Mountain Fire Foundation

TO support sonoma county fire district fire safety

6
Madera County Ag Boosters

The mission is to support youth agricultural programs in Madera County, California

Education
7
Mariposa Trails

To Restore and Promote Public Trails

Environment
8
Mariposa Museum & History Center Inc

Preservation and education of the history of mariposa county

9
Three Rivers Fire Safe Council

To provide education, assist emergency services with finding homes and to help mitigate fire hazards around rural neighborhoods.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Farm Supply Foundation

Support youth agriculture endeavors and education.

Youth Development
11
Mariposa Bears Youth Football and Cheer

Youth Football and Cheer

Recreation & Sports
12
Modoc Fire Safe Council

To bring together the resources of public and private resource organizations in the interests of wildfire prevention loss and mitigation.

Public Safety & Disaster

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mariposa County Sheriffs Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Real World Scholars Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HAPPY GOAT INC — $5,249,000 · EnvironmentHAPPY GOAT INCREAL WORLD SCHOLARS INC — $180,000 · PhilanthropyYOSEMITE SOUTH GATE TRAIL COOP — $10,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE FAIRGROUNDS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherLITTLE LEAGUE INTERNATIONAL — $5,000 · OtherManna House of Mariposa County — $5,000 · OtherTIER ONE TRANQUILITY BASE — $2,000 · OtherJOHN C FREMONT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $1,500 · OtherMariposa Soccer League Inc — $1,500 · Other+7 more — $4,260 · OtherMariposa Fire Safe Council Inc — $30,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMARIPOSA COUNTY SHERIFFS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Crime & LegalMariposa FFA Boosters — $5,700 · EducationBETTER BUSINESS BUREAU SERVING THE PACIFIC SW FDN FOR ED & ENTREPENUER LEAD — $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Environment$5,249,000Philanthropy$180,000Other$34,260Public Safety & Disaster$30,000Crime & Legal$10,000Education$5,700Arts & Culture$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHAPPY GOAT INC — $5,249,000 over 1y, 82% of budgetREAL WORLD SCHOLARS INC — $180,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetMariposa Fire Safe Council Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMARIPOSA COUNTY SHERIFFS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetMariposa FFA Boosters — $5,700 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetManna House of Mariposa County — $5,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetBETTER BUSINESS BUREAU SERVING THE PACIFIC SW FDN FOR ED & ENTREPENUER LEAD — $2,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMariposa Soccer League Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cahalin Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cahalin Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Cahalin Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph