Skip to content

· Public charity

Cadca

CADCA is the only national membership-based organization representing community drug prevention coalitions.

$119k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Health$42kEducation$11kPhilanthropy$10kCrime & Legal$7k
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $18,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $119,200 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $100,700 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$6,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORT BEND REGIONAL COUNCIL ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE INC$6,500
ALLEN COUNTY DRUG AND ALCOHOL CONSORTIUM INC$6,500
PREVENTION RESOURCES INC$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%FORT BEND REGIONAL COUNCIL ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE INC: $7k → 8%UNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY: $10k → 13%GWINNETT COALITION FOR HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES: $10k → 9%ALLEN COUNTY DRUG AND ALCOHOL CONSORTIUM INC: $7k → 12%PREVENTION RESOURCES INC: $7k → 4%PACT COALITION FOR SAFE AND DRUG FREE COMMUNITIES: $7k → 13%THE SCOTTSVILLE ALLEN COUNTY FAITH COALITIONS: $7k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND OFFICE OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION: $11k → 9%PREVENTION RESOURCES INC: $6k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NV
IN
NJ
KY
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coalition Rx Inc

Coalition Rx reduces substance abuse for youth, adults, and seniors in Omaha through education, community partnerships, and public advocacy.

Health
2
Prevention Michigan

Cultivate healthy communities across michigan through resourses, technical assistance, and support.

Civil Rights
3
Hamilton County Coalition

Facilitate safe healthy drug free communities through comprehensive strategies and community based collaborations both private and governmental primary target is young people.

Human Services
4
Roane County Anti Drug Coalition

To reduce youth substance use; to educate and raise awareness of drug issues; to promote community involvement; and to strengthen community partnerships and prevention strategies in Roane County.

Health
5
Linking Efforts Against Drugs

The Organization envisions a healthy community where youth choose not to use alcohol and other drugs. Through parent education, dynamic youth programs, and engagement with key community stakeholders, the Organization is dedicated to the…

—
6
Henry County Prevention Coalition

Empowering the community through prevention, education, and leadership roles in reducing alcohol, tobacco, illegal drugs, and other harmful behaviors amoung our youth and families

Education
7
Drug Strategies

Drug strategies promotes more effective approaches to the nation's drug problems and supports private and public efforts to reduce the demand for drugs through prevention, education and treatment.

Public Benefit
8
Drug Free Marion County

Advocates for a healthier and safer county through prevention and education to reduce substance abuse among youth and adults

Health
9
PreventionFIRST

Mission: PreventionFIRST! implements best practice strategies to reduce the risk of behavioral health disorders. Vision: All communities apply prevention strategies in every stage of life.

Health
10
Thrive Irc Inc

Our mission is to reduce the impact of substance misuse and behavioral health disorders in indian river county through prevention, education, treatment, and recovery support.

Health
11
Alliance for Healthy Communities Inc

To improve the health in our communities through cross-sector partnerships and programs

Health
12
Substance Abuse Prevention Team of Essex County Inc

The Mission of the Prevention Team is to support Essex County individuals and communities in their pursuit of healthy lifestyles and environments free from the negative effects of substance misuse and other addictive behaviors by providing…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Bend Regional Council On Substance Abuse; the most unlike its peers is University of New England. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Prevention Resources Inc: $12,000 · OtherPrevention Resources IncGWINNETT COALITION INC: $10,000 · OtherGWINNETT COALITION INCPACT COALITION FOR SAFE AND DRUG- FREE COMMUNITIES: $6,500 · HealthPACT COALITION FOR SAFE AND DRUG…ALLEN COUNTY DRUG & ALCOHOL CONSORTIUM INC: $6,500 · HealthALLEN COUNTY DRUG & ALCOHOL CONS…FORT BEND REGIONAL COUNCIL ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE: $6,500 · HealthFORT BEND REGIONAL COUNCIL ON SU…University of New England: $11,000 · EducationUniversity of New …UNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF BR…SCOTTSVILLE-ALLEN COUNTY FAITH COALITION INC: $6,500 · Crime & LegalSCOTTSVILL…
Other$22,000Health$19,500Education$11,000Philanthropy$10,000Crime & Legal$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPrevention Resources Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of New England: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACT COALITION FOR SAFE AND DRUG- FREE COMMUNITIES: $6,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALLEN COUNTY DRUG & ALCOHOL CONSORTIUM INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSCOTTSVILLE-ALLEN COUNTY FAITH COALITION INC: $6,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFORT BEND REGIONAL COUNCIL ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE: $6,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cadca funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cadca. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 63%
  • Prevention Resources Inc: 63% of income from government
  • United Way of Broward County Inc: 27% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $40k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cadca’s filings →

More from the funding graph