· Private foundation
C W Golden Foundation Inc
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $3,010 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.
15 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- AUATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION3× · 2018–2020 · $4k · revenue +10%
- BWBILL WINSTON MINISTRIES2× · 2018–2019 · $4k · revenue +65%
- CCChristian City Inc3× · 2018–2020 · $4k · revenue +123%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $3k
- ADALLIANCE DEFENSE FREEDOone grant, 2018 · $3k
- WAWYCLIFFE ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…
Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.
The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…
To share the gospel of jesus christ to the world, to teach & equip the disciples of christ, to teach & train the next generation, to bring the people of god closer together using radio, social media, print literature & other audio & video…
We are a ministry of servants that lead souls to Jesus Christ and leave a lasting impact on the world for Gods glory. Our vision is to save the people of the USA, Amazon and the World with the Gospel of Jesus Christ and disciple them into…
Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ
The overall purpose of this ministry is to carry out the great commission found in matthew 28:19-20, through broadcasting and cybercasting of the gospel of jesus christ and through the dissemination of christian literature. the word…
World outreach
Conducts daily devotional services and sponsors religious projects in developing countries.
Proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ worldwide
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BILL WINSTON MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Christian City Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
- Who funds EXPECTED END MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc ↗
- Who funds Angel Christian Television Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY TELEVISION INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization C W Golden Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from C W Golden Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to C W Golden Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to C W Golden Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on C W Golden’s filings →