Skip to content

· Private foundation

C Dorothy Bader Trust Mercantile Bka United Comm Bkttee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$802
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$19kHealth$14kEducation$13kReligion$9kCrime & Legal$9kHousing & Shelter$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$9k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$801
Median grant
2
States reached
$170k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAITH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$802
CHEERFUL HOME$802
WOODLAND HOME$802
SALVATION ARMY CO LEGAL DEPT$802
SUNSET HOME$801
AMERICAN RED CROSS$801
GOOD SAMARITAN HOME$801
CORBAN UNIVERSITY$750
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$750
MARCH OF DIMES$200
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHEERFUL HOME: $1k → 13%CHEERFUL HOME: $1k → 13%CHEERFUL HOME: $1k → 13%CHEERFUL HOME: $1k → 13%CHEERFUL HOME: $1k → 13%CHEERFUL HOME: $1k → 13%CHEERFUL HOME: $970 → 13%CHEERFUL HOME: $830 → 13%CHEERFUL HOME: $802 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
OR
IA
OH
MO
TN
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$77k · 14 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
7

Total granted

$77k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+55%

Still filing today

43%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHEERFUL HOME ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +57%
  • SH
    SUNSET HOME
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +13%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2k · revenue +175%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA
    one grant, 2024 · $650
  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $647 · revenue +9%
  • BU
    Belmont Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $647 · revenue +55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
2
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
3
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
4
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
Concordia University Chicago

Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…

Education
7
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
8
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
9
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
10
Clarkson University

Clarkson university is an independent, nationally recognized technological university whose faculty of teacher-scholars aspires to offer superior instruction and engage in high-quality research and scholarship in engineering, business,…

Education
11
Belhaven University

Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.

Education
12
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cedarville University; the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAITH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $9,278 · OtherFAITH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHWOODLAND HOME: $9,273 · OtherWOODLAND HOMESALVATION ARMY CO LEGAL DEPT: $9,273 · OtherSALVATION ARMY CO LEGAL DEPTAMERICAN RED CROSS: $9,272 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSGOOD SAMARITAN HOME: $9,271 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN HOMESOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARD: $1,900 · Other+6 more: $5,405 · Other+6 moreSUNSET HOME: $9,272 · HealthSUNSET HOMEMARCH OF DIMES INC: $2,318 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $2,318 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOC…CHEERFUL HOME ASSOCIATION: $9,273 · Human ServicesCHEERFUL HOM…Maryville University - St Louis: $1,611 · EducationQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $965 · EducationCORBAN UNIVERSITY: $750 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $647 · EducationBelmont University: $647 · EducationWheaton College: $600 · EducationCedarville University: $317 · Education
Other$53,672Health$13,908Human Services$9,273Education$5,537

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHEERFUL HOME ASSOCIATION: $9,273 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSUNSET HOME: $9,272 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $2,318 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $2,318 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMaryville University - St Louis: $1,611 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $965 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORBAN UNIVERSITY: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont University: $647 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWheaton College: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCedarville University: $317 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHEERFUL HOME ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SUNSET HOME ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Maryville University - St Louis ↗
  • Who funds QUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CORBAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Belmont University ↗
  • Who funds Wheaton College ↗
  • Who funds Cedarville University ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization C Dorothy Bader Trust Mercantile Bka United Comm Bkttee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from C Dorothy Bader Trust Mercantile Bka United Comm Bkttee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Corban University: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on C Dorothy Bader Trust Mercantile Bka United Comm Bkttee’s filings →

More from the funding graph