Skip to content

· Private foundation

C & a Reid Charitable Trust Art VII

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2019
21
Grants FY2019
6
States reached
$46k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

94% of C & a Reid Charitable Trust Art VII’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Saginaw Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year C & a Reid Charitable Trust Art VII named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $48k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’18
10
’19
10
’20
9
’21
10
’22
10
’23
9
’24
9
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$197kHealth$72kReligion$2kHuman Services$1kAnimals$1kYouth Development$850Housing & Shelter$400Public Safety & Disaster$80Other$0
02FY2019 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k20 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $46k
$100
Median grant
6
States reached
$880k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CM & AA REID CHARITABLE & STD LOAN$45,809
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$500
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOC INC$250
Individual grant recipient$250
UNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY$200
Individual grant recipient$100
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$100
MERSHON CHAPTER OF TROUT$100
COUNTRYSIDE TRINITY CHURCH$100
HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCH$100
YMCA$100
CITY RESCUE MISSION OF SAGINAW$50
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION OF MI$50
SALVATION ARMY$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10 → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $10 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10 → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $10 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10 → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $10 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10 → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $10 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10 → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $10 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10 → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $10 → 14%THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN OF: $100 → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10 → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $10 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
OH
VA
AZ
DC
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$84k · 27 repeat orgs$275 to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2019, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
1

Total granted

$84k
$25

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan
    8× · 2018–2025 · $400 · revenue +23%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150 · revenue +9%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    8× · 2018–2025 · $80 · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • MB
    MITTEN BAY GIRL SCOUT COUNCIL
    one grant, 2018 · $25
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Multiple Sclerosis Society

We will cure ms while empowering people affected by ms to live their best lives.

Health
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Edward W Sparrow Hospital

Improving the health of the people in our communities by providing quality, compassionate care to everyone, every time.

Health
4
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

SRAlab is dedicated to providing the best patient outcomes through the highest-quality clinical care, translational research, scientific discovery and education.

Health
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
7
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
8
Altarum Institute

Altarum is focused on improving the health of individuals with fewer financial resources and populations disenfranchised by the health care system. we drive impactful changes in four domains: 1) transform health service delivery - we work…

Science & Tech
9
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
10
Metropolitan Hospital

Metro health's mission is to improve the health and well-being of our communities. to that end the organization believes the foundation of good health is based on excellent quality primary care. the organization is anchored by a 208-bed,…

Health
11
United Memorial Medical Center

United memorial medical center is the only acute care hospital in genesee county, with 131 licensed acute care beds that provide the necessary healthcare services to a regional population of approximately 138,000 residents and operates the…

Health
12
Mymichigan Medical Center Saginaw

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Saginaw County; the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Saginaw Community Foundation: $193,733 · PhilanthropySaginaw Community Foundation+1 more: $3,650 · PhilanthropyCM & AA REID CHARITABLE & STD LOAN: $61,707 · OtherCM & AA REID CHARITABLE & STD …AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $4,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY+19 more: $7,925 · Other+19 moreARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 · Health+2 more: $230 · HealthRescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan: $400 · Housing & ShelterYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC-SAGINAW: $100 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $80 · Human ServicesSTARR COMMONWEALTH: $70 · Human ServicesGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN: $225 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$197,383Other$73,632Health$6,230Housing & Shelter$400Human Services$250Youth Development$225

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSaginaw Community Foundation: $193,733 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY: $3,650 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan: $400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN: $225 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMENTOR LIVINGSTON: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC-SAGINAW: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $80 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION: $80 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTARR COMMONWEALTH: $70 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Saginaw Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds MENTOR LIVINGSTON ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC-SAGINAW ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds STARR COMMONWEALTH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Consumers Energy FoundationMI17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · Yeo Family Foundation · Wm McNally Family Foundation · Allen E & Marie A Nickless Memorial Foundation · Saginaw Community Foundation · Midland Area Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization C & a Reid Charitable Trust Art VII funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from C & a Reid Charitable Trust Art VII. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on C & a Reid Charitable Trust Art VII’s filings →

    More from the funding graph