Skip to content

· Private foundation

Burlingham Trust Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$135k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$360kYouth Development$175kHealth$110kHuman Services$95kReligion$70kRecreation & Sports$68kArts & Culture$20kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY$50,000
OSU FOUNDATION$50,000
FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS$25,000
SATELLITE GAMING$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $20k → 13%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$474k · 6 repeat orgs$498k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
13

Total granted

$474k
$438k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
-21%

Still filing today

33%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Oregon State University Foundation
    4× · 2021–2024 · $190k · revenue -2%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    3× · 2021–2023 · $130k
  • MV
    MID VALLEY COMM CHURCH
    2× · 2019–2020 · $60k

Funded once

  • OS
    OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $58k
  • SL
    ST LUKE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $55k
  • SH
    SILVERTON HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -378%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Salem Health and Wellness Foundation Inc
Health
2
Silverton Health Dba Legacy Silverton Health

Through Silverton Health we come together to improve the health of our communities. Recognizing our responsibility for careful use of resources, it is our mission to encourage wellness and deliver quality health care, to organize ourselves…

Health
3
The Salem Rotary Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center

Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center (LGSHMC), founded in 1875 is one of the earliest hospitals in the Pacific Northwest. LGSHMC provides acute and tertiary care in Portland, OR with 539 licensed beds. LGSHMC provides a…

Health
5
Southern Oregon Orthopedic Research Foundation
Health
6
Good Samaritan Foundation

Good samaritan foundation has encouraged charitable giving from the community since its establishment in 1969. the foundation supports the advancement of research, education and technology in medical science at legacy good samaritan…

Health
7
The Sam and Reba Sandler Family Foundation
—
8
Jubilee Hall Pdx
Employment
9
Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center

Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center (LMHMC) was founded in 1922 and is a community hospital in Gresham, Oregon with 115 licensed beds. LMHMC offers a wide range of services including family birth, diagnostic services, cancer treatment,…

Health
10
Legacy Meridian Park Hospital

Legacy Meridian Park Hospital (LMPH), established in 1973, is a community hospital in Tualatin, OR, south of Portland with 150 licensed beds. LMPH serves the needs of the fast growing communities of Tualatin, Tigard, Wilsonville, Sherwood,…

Health
11
Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital

Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital (LSCH), established in 2005, provides acute and critical care in Vancouver, with 165 licensed beds. LSCH operates adult, pediatric, and OB/GYN hospitalist programs, as well as four primary care physician…

Health
12
Salem Health

To improve the health and well-being of the people and communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Building Blocks Inc; the most unlike its peers is Satellite Gaming. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $130,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBMID VALLEY COMM CHURCH: $60,000 · OtherMID VALLEY COMM CHURCHOREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $58,000 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYST LUKE SCHOOL: $55,000 · OtherST LUKE SCHOOLWESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherWESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITYSILVERTON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherSILVERTON HEALTH FOUNDATIONLEGACY SILVERTON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherLEGACY SILVERTON HEALTH FOUNDATIONTHE FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MARION AND POLK COUNTIES: $50,000 · OtherTHE FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MARION AND POLK COUNTIESTHE ABBEY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherTHE ABBEY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherVALOR MENTORING: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · Other+5 more: $74,000 · Other+5 moreOregon State University Foundation: $190,000 · EducationOregon State Universit…FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE GILBERT HOUSE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureSATELLITE GAMING: $10,000 · Religion
Other$707,000Education$190,000Human Services$45,000Arts & Culture$20,000Religion$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOregon State University Foundation: $190,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MARION AND POLK COUNTIES: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSALEM ROTARY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE GILBERT HOUSE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSALEM FREE CLINICS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSATELLITE GAMING: $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SILVERTON HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MARION AND POLK COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC ↗
  • Who funds SALEM ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GILBERT HOUSE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds SALEM FREE CLINICS ↗
  • Who funds SATELLITE GAMING ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Salem FoundationOR17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Salem Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley · Willamette Health Council · Maps Community Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Burlingham Trust Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Burlingham Trust Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 68%
  • Family Building Blocks Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Burlingham Trust Inc?

Find your warmest path to Burlingham Trust Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Burlingham’s filings →

More from the funding graph