Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bulldog Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Youth Development$61kEducation$41kHuman Services$25kHealth$21kRecreation & Sports$18kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kHousing & Shelter$3kCrime & Legal$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $813
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE JOSEPH FUND$20,000
FEEDING 5000US$813
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CIRCLE HAVEN: $5k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Bulldog Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Bulldog Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$87k · 4 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
14

Total granted

$87k
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+119%

Still filing today

75%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LO
    LUCY OUTREACH A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $56k · revenue -39%
  • FF
    FERRIS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $16k · revenue +17%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k

Funded once

  • AT
    ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • FM
    FBIAA MEMBERSHIP ASSISTANCE FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +79%
  • BU
    BEAST UP ACADEMY
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jim Saunders Fund

Providing for educational scholarships and grants to individuals with the goal of assisting them to continually seek knowledge. additionally, to provide grants to individuals who have experienced a catastrophic event or an emergency…

Philanthropy
2
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
3
The Surety Foundation Inc

The surety foundation is a charitable organization founded to increase diversity within the surety and fidelity industry. recognizing the value of diverse ideas and backgrounds the member companies of the surety & fidelity association of…

Philanthropy
4
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
5
The City University of New York School of Law Foundation Inc

The foundation supports the law school in its mission to increase access to legal education to those from groups underrepresented in the profession and to prepare its graduates for public interest and public service practice.

Education
6
St Joseph Endowment Fund

The purpose of the endowment is to strengthen and sustain a rich faith-centered academic experience for all students at st. joseph school for years to come.

Human Services
7
Daniel Murphy Scholarship Fund

The mission of the daniel murphy scholarship fund is to give high school scholarship assistance and educational support to chicago students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds. the fund seeks to make a life-altering difference in…

—
8
Special Forces Foundation

The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.

Philanthropy
9
Iowa Credit Union Foundation

Founded in 1995 as the philanthropic arm of the iowa credit union league and guided by the credit union philosophy of "people helping people", the iowa credit union foundation (the foundation) works to champion financial well-being for…

Unclassified
10
Children's Hospital & Medical Center Foundation

Children's nebraska foundation (the foundation) was created in 1981 to raise awareness and manage and distribute funds to support children's hospital & medical center's (the hospital) premier pediatric services and programs. as an advocate…

Health
11
Foundation for Financial Planning Inc

Our mission is to help people in need improve their financial lives by expanding access to pro bono financial planning.

Human Services
12
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shawnee End Zone Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FERRIS FOUNDATION: $15,500 · OtherFERRIS FOUNDATIONADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE: $12,000 · OtherADULT & TEEN CHALLENGEIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBEAST UP ACADEMY: $6,114 · OtherBEAST UP ACADEMYLEAD FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherLEAD FOUNDATIONKENTUCKY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $5,000 · OtherKENTUCKY SCHOOL DISTRICTSARASOTA YACHT CLUB CARES: $5,000 · OtherSARASOTA YACHT CLUB CARESNEXT LEVEL 7ON7 FOOTBALL: $5,000 · OtherNEXT LEVEL 7ON7 FOOTBALLCOMMITMENT COMUNITY CHURCH: $3,379 · OtherFBIAA: $2,500 · OtherCHEE SANTONE MEMORIAL GOLF TOURNMENT: $2,500 · Other+2 more: $1,913 · OtherLUCY OUTREACH A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $55,500 · Youth DevelopmentLUCY OUTREACH A NJ NONPROFIT CORPOR…THE JOSEPH FUND INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JOSEPH F…FBIAA MEMBERSHIP ASSISTANCE FUND: $10,000 · Human ServicesFBIAA MEM…CIRCLE HAVEN INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCIRCLE HA…SHAWNEE END ZONE CLUB INC: $5,900 · EducationSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsCHILDHOOD LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION: $1,600 · Health
Other$73,906Youth Development$55,500Philanthropy$20,000Human Services$15,000Education$5,900Recreation & Sports$5,000Health$1,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUCY OUTREACH A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $55,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHE JOSEPH FUND INC: $20,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetFERRIS FOUNDATION: $15,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFBIAA MEMBERSHIP ASSISTANCE FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSHAWNEE END ZONE CLUB INC: $5,900 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetCIRCLE HAVEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHOOD LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION: $1,600 over 1y, 20% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUCY OUTREACH A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JOSEPH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FERRIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FBIAA MEMBERSHIP ASSISTANCE FUND ↗
  • Who funds SHAWNEE END ZONE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLE HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHOOD LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bulldog Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bulldog Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bulldog Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Bulldog Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bulldog’s filings →

    More from the funding graph