Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Buckner Foundation Inc

Grantmaking and asset management for the support and benefit of the 501(c)(3) ministries of buckner international.

$57M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$140MInternational$128MPhilanthropy$900k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $43k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $160k
  • $250k+6 grants · $57M
$7,511,252
Median grant
2
States reached
$547M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL$24,629,187
BUCKNER RETIREMENT SERVICES INC$10,465,046
BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC$10,341,292
BUCKNER SENIOR LIVING INC$7,511,252
TARRANT COUNTY SENIOR LIVING CENTER INC$3,175,000
IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$900,000
RIO GRANDE CHILDREN'S HOME INC$160,483
BAPTIST MEMORIALS MINISTRIES$43,355
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $230.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $24.6M → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10.3M → 14%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $22.7M → 14%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $20.9M → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $17.6M → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $15.8M → 14%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $14.0M → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $13.6M → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $13.3M → 14%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $12.4M → 14%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $11.4M → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $11.4M → 14%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $11.2M → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10.8M → 14%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $10.3M → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10.1M → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$264M · 6 repeat orgs$3.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against -20% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

$264M
$507k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-20%

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $128M · revenue +129% · 71% of their budget
  • BR
    BUCKNER RETIREMENT SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $25M · revenue +46%
  • BS
    BUCKNER SENIOR LIVING INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $7.5M · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • BA
    BUCKNER ADOPTION AND MATERNITY SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $378k · 63% of their budget
  • MC
    MFHL CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $129k · revenue -20% · 41% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Buckner Foundation Inc

Grantmaking and asset management for the support and benefit of the 501(c)(3) ministries of buckner international.

Human Services
2
Bst Health Services Corp

Bst health services corp is dedicated to quality retirement living with emphasis on individual well-being.

Health
3
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
4
Buckley Country Day School

The school's mission is grounded in the belief expressed by b. lord buckley that opening the eyes and awakening the mind is the essence of education. guided by that mission for almost a century, buckley has purposely focused on developing…

Education
5
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
6
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

7
Benefis Health System Inc

We provide excellent care for all, healing body, mind and spirit. benefis health system, inc. is organized to oversee, coordinate and direct the assets and operations of benefis hospitals, inc., benefis community care, inc., benefis…

Health
8
Bhi Foundation Inc

To support bhi senior living, inc., a section 501(c)3 organization.

Housing & Shelter
9
Baptist Health System Inc

"as a witness to the love of god, revealed through jesus christ, the baptist health system is committed to ministries that enhance the health, dignity, and wholeness of those we serve, through integrity, compassion, advocacy,…

Health
10
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
11
Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Retirement Community

Bishop gadsden, a life care retirement community, embraces god's call to ministry. we affirm positive living for all who live and work here. we serve with integrity. we exercise wise stewardship. we reach out with a generous spirit.

Human Services
12
Christian Care Surprise Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Buckner Senior Living Inc and the most unlike its peers is Impact Investing Charitable Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL — $127,696,814 · Human ServicesBUCKNER INTERNATIONALBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $102,964,968 · Human ServicesBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INCBUCKNER RETIREMENT SERVICES INC — $24,564,243 · Housing & ShelterBUCKNER RETIRE…BUCKNER SENIOR LIVING INC — $7,548,252 · Housing & ShelterBUCKNER SENIOR…TARRANT COUNTY SENIOR LIVING CENTER INC — $3,175,000 · Housing & ShelterTARRANT COUNTY…RIO GRANDE CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $1,140,694 · OtherBUCKNER ADOPTION AND MATERNITY SERVICES INC — $377,838 · OtherMFHL CORPORATION — $128,791 · OtherIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $900,000 · PhilanthropyBAPTIST MEMORIALS MINISTRIES — $74,855 · Health
Human Services$230,661,782Housing & Shelter$35,287,495Other$1,647,323Philanthropy$900,000Health$74,855

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBUCKNER INTERNATIONAL — $127,696,814 over 8y, 71% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $102,964,968 over 8y, 41% of budgetBUCKNER RETIREMENT SERVICES INC — $24,564,243 over 8y, 15% of budgetBUCKNER SENIOR LIVING INC — $7,548,252 over 2y, 19% of budgetTARRANT COUNTY SENIOR LIVING CENTER INC — $3,175,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetRIO GRANDE CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $1,140,694 over 8y, 17% of budgetIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $900,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBUCKNER ADOPTION AND MATERNITY SERVICES INC — $377,838 over 1y, 63% of budgetMFHL CORPORATION — $128,791 over 1y, 41% of budgetBAPTIST MEMORIALS MINISTRIES — $74,855 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Buckner Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph