Skip to content

· Private foundation

Buckey Clark Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$57kHuman Services$44kEnvironment$27kPhilanthropy$8kAnimals$7kArts & Culture$6kSocial Science$5kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$504k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHERN SUSSEX ROTARY$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
DE WILDLANDS INC$10,000
DE BOTANIC GARDENS$6,000
ST TIMOTHY'S SCHOOL$5,000
MERR INSTITUTE$5,000
COLBY SAWYER COLLEGE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
WAYNESBORO AREA INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE TRUST & MUSEUM$1,000
HISTORIC VILLAGE OCEAN VIEW$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SOUTH COASTAL VILLAGE VOLUNTEERS: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
PA
CA
MD
DE
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 91% of Buckey Clark Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 75% of the giving stays in DE; by stated purpose, 7%.

Buckey Clark Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 12 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
14

Total granted

$157k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
0%

Still filing today

42%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CORPORATION OF ST TIMOTHY'S SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +15%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR THE INLAND BAYS INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +151%
  • GP
    GREYHOUND PET ADOPTIONS OF DELAWARE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $7k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • DW
    DELAWARE WILD LANDS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +14%
  • ST
    ST TIMOTHY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • DT
    DE TECH EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wetlands Foundation
Environment
2
Preservation Delaware
Arts & Culture
3
Catholic Scholars of De
Unclassified
4
Partnership for the Delaware Estuary Inc

Partnership for the delaware estuary, inc. (pde), host of the delaware estuary program, leads collaborative, science-based efforts to improve the delaware river and bay, which covers portions of delaware, new jersey, and pennsylvania.

Environment
5
The Wetlands Institute

The mission of the wetlands institute is to promote appreciation, understanding and stewardship of wetland and coastal ecosystems through programs in research, conservation and education.

—
6
St Andrew's School of Delaware Inc

St. andrew's school develops the independence, character, mind, and spirit of its students to prepare them for lives of citizenship, service, and purpose.all our students live, learn, and play in the natural beauty of our 2,200-acre…

Education
7
Soundwaters Inc

We work to create a better world through joyful learning on long island sound. soundwaters enriches our community and protects our environment through environmental education, jobs and skills training, and public engagement.

Environment
8
Connecticut River Coastal Conservation District Inc

To promote the sound use and management of natural resources. the district provides technical assistance and education in soil and water conservation and control.

Environment
9
Island Institute

We boldly navigate climate and economic change with island and coastal communities to expand opportunities and deliver solutions.

Education
10
Delaware Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Delaware spca is dedicated to the prevention of cruelty and the encouragement of humane treatment of all animals.

Animals
11
Soundkeeper Inc

Soundkeeper is dedicated to the protection and enhancement of the biological, physical, and chemical integrity of the long island sound and its watershed.

—
12
Delaware Technology Park Inc

The mission of the Delaware Technology Park is to stimulate economic growth and create high-value jobs in the Mid-Atlantic region by providing affordable state-of-the-art facilities, access to necessary resources and connections to the…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for the Inland Bays Inc; the most unlike its peers is Strength in Our Voices. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $37,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOUTHERN SUSSEX ROTARY: $32,500 · OtherSOUTHERN SUSSEX ROTARYIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSUSSEX MONTESSORI CHARTER SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherSUSSEX MONTESSORI CHARTER SCHOOLDELAWARE WILD LANDS INC: $10,000 · OtherDELAWARE WILD LANDS INCGREYHOUND PET ADOPTIONS OF DELAWARE: $7,000 · OtherRIDGE MURRAY FOUNDATION: $7,000 · OtherDE BOTANIC GARDENS: $6,000 · Other+17 more: $38,888 · Other+17 moreCORPORATION OF ST TIMOTHY'S SCHOOL: $20,640 · EducationCORPORATION OF…Colby-Sawyer College: $6,000 · EducationColby-Sawyer C…+1 more: $500 · EducationCENTER FOR THE INLAND BAYS INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EnvironmentSOUTH COASTAL VILLAGE VOLUNTEERS INC: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$166,388Education$27,140Environment$11,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCORPORATION OF ST TIMOTHY'S SCHOOL: $20,640 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDELAWARE WILD LANDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCENTER FOR THE INLAND BAYS INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGREYHOUND PET ADOPTIONS OF DELAWARE: $7,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetColby-Sawyer College: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVermont Haiti Project: $4,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUSSEX ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CORPORATION OF ST TIMOTHY'S SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE WILD LANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR THE INLAND BAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREYHOUND PET ADOPTIONS OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds Colby-Sawyer College ↗
  • Who funds Vermont Haiti Project ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH COASTAL VILLAGE VOLUNTEERS INC ↗
  • Who funds STRENGTH IN OUR VOICES ↗
  • Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUSSEX ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delaware Community Foundation IncDE13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Buckey Clark Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Buckey Clark Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 74%
  • Center for the Inland Bays Inc: 74% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Buckey Clark Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Buckey Clark Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Buckey Clark Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph