Skip to content

· Public charity

Buckets for Hunger Inc

To wipe away the tears of hunger and to replace them with a glimmer of hope in the eyes of the needy.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$342k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $31,300, the rows itemized in this filing. The $41,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,700 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$70k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRUIT OF THE VINE FOOD PANTRY$9,300
JEFFERSON FOOD PANTRY$9,000
THE GATHERING SOURCE$7,000
WATERTOWN FOOD PANTRY$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JEFFERSON FOOD PANTRY: $9k → 8%CARITAS INC FOOD PANTRY: $7k → 10%JEFFERSON FOOD PANTRY: $8k → 8%CARITAS INC FOOD PANTRY: $7k → 10%JEFFERSON FOOD PANTRY: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$303k · 8 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$303k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
-1%

Still filing today

63%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    Watertown Food Pantry
    6× · 2020–2025 · $91k · revenue +3%
  • OA
    Oregon Area Food Pantry
    2× · 2020–2021 · $34k · revenue +23%
  • TG
    The Gathering Source Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $23k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION COALITION FOR SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -76%
  • NH
    NEW HEIGHTS LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • BB
    BEYOND BLESSED PANTRYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waushara County Food Pantry Inc

We provide food, household and personal items as available to combat food scarcity and poverty in our community.

Food & Nutrition
2
Community Food Bank

To fight hunger and poverty by providing food, education, programs and resources to families in a dignified, personal and expeditious manner directly as a food pantry and as a food bank; without zip code restrictions.

Food & Nutrition
3
Community Food Pantry

The organizations mission is to distribute food toiletries detergent and other basic necessities to individuals and families.

Food & Nutrition
4
Ozark Food Pantry

Our Mission is to reach out to those in need in our area by providing healthy and nuritious food and other necessities to families and individuals who cannot afford them. In addition, the Pantry refers families to other agencies which can…

Food & Nutrition
5
Medina County Food Pantry

Provide emergency food for those in need.

Human Services
6
Benton County Food Pantry

Feed the needy people of benton county

Food & Nutrition
7
Community for Christ Outreach

Religious Orginazation

Housing & Shelter
8
Southwest Carver County Food Shelf

Food shelf providing food assistance to people in need in carver county.

Food & Nutrition
9
Poverty Resistance Food Pantry

Proide food for low income people

Food & Nutrition
10
Camden Area Christian Food Pantry

Provide food and basic necessities to individuals and families in need in the Camden, Maine area

Food & Nutrition
11
Community Pantry

Provide emergency food, housing and utilities for people in need in the community

Human Services
12
Cumby Food Pantry

food pantry

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Caritas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jeff Co Food Pantry Lana Jilek. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Watertown Food Pantry: $91,305 · OtherWatertown Food PantryTRINITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP OF STANLEY LTD: $63,300 · OtherTRINITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP OF STANLEY LTDLONE ROCK COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $28,160 · OtherLONE ROCK COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRYNORTH AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $24,920 · OtherNORTH AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCHCOMMUNITY ACTION COALITION FOR SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $15,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION COALITION FOR SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC+2 more: $12,000 · OtherOregon Area Food Pantry: $34,420 · Food & NutritionOregon Area Food Pantr…The Gathering Source Inc: $22,500 · Food & NutritionThe Gathering Source I…BEYOND BLESSED PANTRY: $7,000 · Food & NutritionBEYOND BLESSED PANTRYNEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionNEIGHBORS HELPING NEIG…JEFF CO FOOD PANTRY LANA JILEK: $24,500 · Human ServicesJEFF CO FOOD…CARITAS INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesCARITAS INC
Other$234,685Food & Nutrition$68,920Human Services$38,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWatertown Food Pantry: $91,305 over 6y, 22% of budgetOregon Area Food Pantry: $34,420 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetJEFF CO FOOD PANTRY LANA JILEK: $24,500 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetThe Gathering Source Inc: $22,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION COALITION FOR SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARITAS INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBEYOND BLESSED PANTRY: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Watertown Food Pantry ↗
  • Who funds Oregon Area Food Pantry ↗
  • Who funds JEFF CO FOOD PANTRY LANA JILEK ↗
  • Who funds The Gathering Source Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION COALITION FOR SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS INC ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND BLESSED PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Second Harvest Foodbank of Southern WiWI19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Second Harvest Foodbank of Southern Wi · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Buckets for Hunger Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Buckets for Hunger Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Buckets for Hunger Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Buckets for Hunger Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Buckets for Hunger’s filings →

    More from the funding graph