Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bryan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Recreation & Sports$27kReligion$25kEducation$21kHuman Services$21kYouth Development$17kHealth$12kFood & Nutrition$3kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$251k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIELDS OF BOYNE CITY$3,500
YOUNG LIFE OF BOYNE CITY$3,000
NAZARETH ACADEMY$3,000
THE HEALING CENTER$2,250
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,000
OASIS FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED$1,500
ST ROBERTS OF NEWMINISTER$500
PETOSKEYHARBOR SPRINGS FOUNDATION$500
CASA OF KENT COUNTY$500
OLIVIA'S GIFT$500
FAMILY FUTURES$250
JUNIOR LEAGUE OF GRAND RAPIDS$250
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KENT COUNTY$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE COVENANT HOUSE OF MICHIGAN: $250 → 21%THE HEALING CENTER: $2k → 16%THE HEALING CENTER: $2k → 16%THE HEALING CENTER: $2k → 16%THE HEALING CENTER: $2k → 16%THE HEALING CENTER: $2k → 16%THE HEALING CENTER: $2k → 16%THE HEALING CENTER: $1k → 16%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $625 → 11%FRIENDSHIP CENTERS OF EMMET COUNTY: $500 → 9%FRIENDSHIP CENTERS OF EMMET COUNTY: $450 → 9%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $250 → 11%FRIENDSHIP CENTERS OF EMMET COUNTY: $375 → 9%FRIENDSHIP CENTERS OF EMMET COUNTY: $300 → 9%FRIENDSHIP CENTERS OF EMMET COUNTY: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$105k · 29 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
17

Total granted

$105k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+11%

Still filing today

31%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsEducationRecreation & SportsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    The Healing Center
    7× · 2018–2025 · $13k · revenue +81%
  • OF
    OASIS FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED NFP
    3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +184%
  • TM
    THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT
    5× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • TW
    THE WATERFRONT FIELD OF DREAMS
    one grant, 2022 · $17k
  • TO
    THE OPEN DOOR MENTORS FOR TEEN MOTH
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • SG
    St Georges Center Inc dba St George Table
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Social Services of the Upper Peninsula Inc

Working in the spirit of Gods universal love, our mission is to nurture, stabilize and strengthen the diverse families of the Upper Peninsula Community by providing mental health and addiction counseling services, child welfare services,…

Human Services
2
Family Outreach Center

Leading the way in promoting healthy family living by reaching out to underserved populations and those who are in our community.

3
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

4
Lighthouse Christian Home and Services Inc

For god's love to be expressed for and by individuals with developmental disabilities through faith based programs and services.

Human Services
5
Bishop Sullivan Center Inc

Inspired by Christian faith, Bishop Sullivan Center shows God's love to people in financial hardship by providing food, help in finding jobs, and other aid. Beyond material assistance, Bishop Sulivan Center strives to build relationships…

Human Services
6
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
7
David's House Ministries

To provide quality care, facilities and supportive services for adults with a developmental disability, traumatic brain injury or mental illness. being enabled by god, we strive to provide an intentionally christian environment and program…

Housing & Shelter
8
Family & Children's Services of Mid-Michigan Inc

We inspire hope and well-being for people of all ages by providing counseling, education and support.

Human Services
9
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

10
Michigan Family Resources

Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.

Education
11
St Johns Community Center

to provide food and shelter for the homeless of Detroit

12
Christian Family Counseling Center

The mission of the Christian family counseling center is to restore, educate, and strengthen people through professional mental health services that integrate a gracious Christian perspective wtih psychological principles, striving to help…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Degage Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Oasis for the Visually Impaired Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr21%13%10–20yr17%30%20–35yr12%30%35–55yr12%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr21%9%10–20yr17%47%20–35yr12%26%35–55yr12%18%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
13%
2,364/17,991

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE WATERFRONT FIELD OF DREAMS — $16,750 · OtherTHE WATERFRONT FIELD OF DREAMSNAZARETH ACADEMY — $11,850 · OtherNAZARETH ACADEMYFIELDS OF BOYNE CITY — $9,875 · OtherFIELDS OF BOYNE CITYYOUNG LIFE OF BOYNE CITY — $9,250 · OtherYOUNG LIFE OF BOYNE CITYDOWNERS GROVE COMMUNITY CHURCH — $6,500 · OtherDOWNERS GROVE COMMUNITY CHURCHFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $5,625 · OtherNAZARETH ACADEMY WALK-A-THON — $4,000 · OtherTREASURE HEALTH HOSPICE — $4,000 · Other+33 more — $39,925 · Other+33 moreThe Healing Center — $12,625 · Human ServicesThe Healing C…FRIENDSHIP CENTERS OF EMMET COUNTY INC — $1,875 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP CE…St Georges Center Inc dba St George Table — $1,000 · Human ServicesSt Georges Ce…DEGAGE MINISTRIES — $875 · Human Services+1 more — $250 · Human ServicesOASIS FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED NFP — $3,500 · HealthDOWN IN THE SOUTHLAND NFP — $500 · HealthAquinas College — $2,250 · EducationCASA of Kent County Inc — $1,750 · Civil RightsTHE POWER OF EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $1,600 · InternationalGOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BOYNE — $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$107,775Human Services$16,625Health$4,000Education$2,250Civil Rights$1,750International$1,600Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Healing Center — $12,625 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOASIS FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED NFP — $3,500 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetAquinas College — $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT — $2,075 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CENTERS OF EMMET COUNTY INC — $1,875 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCASA of Kent County Inc — $1,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE POWER OF EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $1,600 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BOYNE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDEGAGE MINISTRIES — $875 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWN IN THE SOUTHLAND NFP — $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KENT COUNTY INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Daggett — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCISCAN LIFE CENTER NETWORK INCORPORATED — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Healing Center
  • Who funds OASIS FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED NFP
  • Who funds Aquinas College
  • Who funds THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP CENTERS OF EMMET COUNTY INC
  • Who funds CASA of Kent County Inc
  • Who funds THE POWER OF EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds St Georges Center Inc dba St George Table
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN COUNSELING INC
  • Who funds GOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BOYNE
  • Who funds DEGAGE MINISTRIES
  • Who funds OLIVIA'S GIFT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Frey FoundationMI19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Frey Foundation · Spartannash Foundation · The Wege Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · The Sebastian Foundation · Triford Foundation · Charlevoix County Community Foundation · The Meijer Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · WK Kellogg Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bryan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Franciscan Life Center Network Incorporated0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bryan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bryan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph