Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bruce Z and Phyllis J Raines Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$116kEducation$61kHealth$55kFood & Nutrition$53kReligion$8kYouth Development$3kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$809k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ILEAP$11,000
OK FAMILY NETWORK$9,000
FRIENDS OF WISTER LIBRARY$8,500
DAY SPRING VILLA$7,500
CLAREHOUSE$5,000
IRON GATE$5,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLA$4,000
GAINING GROUND$3,000
SERVICE DOG PROJECT$2,000
DISCIPLES ON VILLAGE AUXILLARY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SERVICE DOG PROJECT: $2k → 10%SERVICE DOG PROJECT: $2k → 10%SERVICE DOG PROJECT: $2k → 10%SERVICE DOG PROJECT: $2k → 10%SERVICE DOG PROJECT: $2k → 10%SERVICE DOG PROJECT: $2k → 10%SERVICE DOG PROJECT: $1k → 10%SERVICE DOG PROJECT: $500 → 10%SISU YOUTH SERVICES: $2k → 16%SISU YOUTH SERVICES: $2k → 16%CLAREHOUSE: $5k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $5k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $5k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $5k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $3k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $3k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $3k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$311k · 13 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against -40% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$311k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
-40%

Still filing today

54%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationReligionHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SPRING SHELTER INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +395%
  • IRON GATE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $34k · revenue +136%
  • Clarehouse Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • L
    LEAPS
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • FOOD AND SHELTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -40%
  • BB
    BETHEL BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
2
Shelterwell Inc

Shelterwell fosters a spirit of connected community, centered on the belief that housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
3
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

—
4
La Luz Organization Inc

La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.

Human Services
5
Oklahoma Halfway House Inc

The Cardinal Community House is a resource dedicated to assisting individuals experiencing homelessness. Our work is to address urgent critical needs, like housing, while addressing underlying concerns to bring about life-changing…

Health
6
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
7
Tulsa Spca

The Tulsa SPCA's mission is to improve the lives of dogs and cats, and their human companions.

Animals
8
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
9
Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc

Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
10
Women in Safe Home Inc Dba Wish

An organization that provides a safe place for victims of domestic violence, rape, sexual assault, and stalking as they make plans and arrangements to recover from trauma and begin new lives.

Human Services
11
Okmulgee County Homeless Shelter Inc

To promote the welfare of okmulgee county by providing temporary shelter and food for homeless and destitute persons

Human Services
12
Fostering Sweet Dreams Inc

To provide essential resources to oklahomas most vulnerable children by providing foster families with beds, bedding, carseats, & other furniture.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food and Shelter Inc; the most unlike its peers is Service Dog Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ILEAP: $55,000 · OtherILEAPFRIENDS OF WISTER LIBRARY: $53,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF WISTER LIBRARYOK FAMILY NETWORK: $36,550 · OtherOK FAMILY NETWORKIndividual grant recipient: $19,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLA: $12,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLA+3 more: $13,000 · Other+3 moreTHE SPRING SHELTER INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesTHE SPRING SHELTER INCClarehouse Inc: $32,000 · Human ServicesClarehouse IncSERVICE DOG PROJECT INC: $12,550 · Human ServicesSERVICE DOG PROJECT INCSISU YOUTH INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesIRON GATE INC: $34,000 · ReligionIRON GATE IN…GAINING GROUND CORPORATION: $6,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · EducationMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc: $6,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD AND SHELTER INC: $1,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$189,550Human Services$82,550Religion$34,000Education$7,000Food & Nutrition$6,000Housing & Shelter$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SPRING SHELTER INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetIRON GATE INC: $34,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetClarehouse Inc: $32,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSERVICE DOG PROJECT INC: $12,550 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGAINING GROUND CORPORATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSISU YOUTH INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD AND SHELTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SPRING SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds IRON GATE INC ↗
  • Who funds Clarehouse Inc ↗
  • Who funds SERVICE DOG PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Norman Inc ↗
  • Who funds GAINING GROUND CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SISU YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD AND SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sarkeys FoundationOK17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sarkeys Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Charles W Harris Foundation · Paul L Sisk and Helen I Sisk Charitable Trust · Flint Family Foundation · Hille Family Charitable Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · The Gelvin Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Tulsa Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bruce Z and Phyllis J Raines Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bruce Z and Phyllis J Raines Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Sisu Youth Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Food and Shelter Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bruce Z and Phyllis J Raines Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph