Skip to content

· Private foundation

Browning Kimball Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$761k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.7MHuman Services$1.1MHealth$1.1MEducation$936kYouth Development$603kFood & Nutrition$535kRecreation & Sports$349kEnvironment$320kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $583k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $145k
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$94,737
FRIENDS OF THE POOL & PARK FOUNDATI$50,000
MONTANA FFA FOUNDATION$46,000
SPECIAL K RANCH$44,100
RURAL MONTANA FOUNDATION$40,000
CM RUSSELL MUSEUM$39,349
WESTERN SUSTAINABILITY EXCHANGE$35,000
MONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK$30,000
AWARE$30,000
PRODUCERS PARTNERSHIP INC$30,000
MONTANA FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION$26,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC$25,000
ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH INC$25,000
HELP COMMITTEE AND BOYS & GIRLS CLU$22,000
YOUNG PARENTS EDUCATION CENTER INC$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CUTTING FENCES FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%CHILD BRIDGE: $5k → 18%BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND: $10k → 6%BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND: $5k → 6%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $40k → 9%BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND: $3k → 6%BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND: $3k → 6%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $40k → 9%BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND: $1k → 6%HEART OF MONTANA FARM IN THE DELL: $10k → 12%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $25k → 9%BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND: $1k → 6%BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND: $1k → 6%FLORENCE CRITTENTON HOME & SERVICES: $8k → 9%FLORENCE CRITTENTON HOME & SERVICES: $8k → 9%FLORENCE CRITTENTON HOME & SERVICES: $8k → 9%FLORENCE CRITTENTON HOME & SERVICES: $8k → 9%FLORENCE CRITTENTON HOME & SERVICES: $8k → 9%FLORENCE CRITTENTON HOME & SERVICES: $8k → 9%PEACE PLACE: $15k → 14%PEACE PLACE: $10k → 14%PEACE PLACE: $8k → 14%PEACE PLACE: $8k → 14%PEACE PLACE: $8k → 14%PEACE PLACE: $5k → 14%PEACE PLACE: $3k → 14%PEACE PLACE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
PA
CA
UT
CO
AZ
OK
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.7M · 80 repeat orgs$560k to everyone else

80 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 52 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

80
53

Total granted

$7.7M
$487k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+28%

Still filing today

65%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TRIGG - C M RUSSELL FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +21%
  • SK
    SPECIAL K RANCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $406k · revenue +49%
  • MS
    Montana State University Foundation Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $316k · revenue +384%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BEAVER CREEK PARK INC
    one grant, 2024 · $78k · 67% of their budget
  • HC
    HILL COUNTY WEED DISTRICT
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
  • DO
    DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scenic Montana Trails
—
2
Montana Healthcare Foundation
Philanthropy
3
The Greater Montana Foundation
Philanthropy
4
ZooMontana Inc

Our mission is to provide visitors with an engaging, recreational, and educational experience, while ensuring exceptional care for our animal and plant collections and supporting responsible propagation programs for species in need.

Animals
5
Montana Pediatric Cancer Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Montana Conservation Elders
Environment
7
Montana Business Leadership Council

The mblc exists to encourage and enact business-friendly policies that create good-paying jobs and make montana a better place to live. the primary purpose of the mblc is to educate the public on important business issues, enable citizens…

Community Improvement
8
Colt Family Foundation Montana
Philanthropy
9
Wyoming Wildlife Advocates

To promote science-based wildlife management that fosters ecosystem health and dynamic equilibrium between species throughout the state of wyoming.

Animals
10
Montanas Outdoor Legacy Foundation

To collectively serve as a catalyst for engagement and bonding of people to our wildlife and public lands in montana through a sense of place, education, access, research and stewardship.

Environment
11
Montana Policy Action Inc

To promote public policy solutions that provide increased access to economic opportunities, greater individual freedoms and encourage greater participation in public matters by providing research and recommendation on public policy

Social Science
12
Eastern Montana Veterans Home Foundation
Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montana Stockgrowers Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Havre Beneath the Streets. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 140 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
79/80
Grantees still filing
48/80
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPECIAL K RANCH: $405,641 · OtherSPECIAL K RANCHOAK HALL ESPICOPAL SCHOOL: $385,500 · OtherOAK HALL ESPICOPAL SCHOOLNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC: $180,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE HI-LINE: $163,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $245,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMAFRIENDS OF THE POOL & PARK FOUNDATION: $150,000 · Other+90 more: $2,892,687 · Other+90 moreTRIGG - C M RUSSELL FOUNDATION INC: $1,465,701 · Arts & CultureTRIGG - C M RUSSELL …+6 more: $92,152 · Arts & Culture+6 moreHUDSON DAVID MCNEEL MEMORIAL FUND: $213,284 · HealthHUDSON DAV…GREAT FALLS CLINIC LEGACY FOUNDATION: $120,000 · HealthGREAT FALL…BENEFIS HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 · HealthBENEFIS HE…MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF MONTANA INC: $105,000 · HealthMENTAL HEA…MONTANA METH PROJECT: $65,000 · HealthMONTANA ME…ROUNDUP MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · HealthROUNDUP ME…OKLAHOMA HEART HOSPITAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $43,500 · Health+8 more: $100,500 · Health+8 moreGREAT FALLS RESCUE MISSION: $122,000 · Human ServicesYCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $104,500 · Human ServicesGREAT FALLS CHILDREN'S RECEIVING HOME: $92,000 · Human ServicesOperation Warm Inc: $61,000 · Human ServicesEAGLE MOUNT GREAT FALLS: $60,000 · Human ServicesPEACE PLACE: $57,500 · Human ServicesFLORENCE CRITTENTON HOME AND SERVICES: $45,000 · Human ServicesBRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $23,000 · Human Services+4 more: $22,500 · Human ServicesMontana State University Foundation Inc: $315,790 · EducationST DOMINIC SAVIO ACADEMY INC DBA STORY AUTISM CENTER: $235,000 · Education+2 more: $16,000 · EducationMONTANA FFA FOUNDATION INC: $166,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIG SKY YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT INC: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LEWISTOWN: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentNCHA CHARITIES FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentPRODUCERS PARTNERSHIP INC: $229,500 · Community ImprovementRED ANTS PANTS FOUNDATION: $67,000 · Community Improvement
Other$4,421,828Arts & Culture$1,557,853Health$817,284Human Services$587,500Education$566,790Youth Development$306,000Community Improvement$296,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRIGG - C M RUSSELL FOUNDATION INC: $1,465,701 over 7y, 9.3% of budgetSPECIAL K RANCH: $405,641 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetMontana State University Foundation Inc: $315,790 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $245,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetST DOMINIC SAVIO ACADEMY INC DBA STORY AUTISM CENTER: $235,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetPRODUCERS PARTNERSHIP INC: $229,500 over 5y, 14% of budgetHUDSON DAVID MCNEEL MEMORIAL FUND: $213,284 over 6y, 72% of budgetMONTANA FFA FOUNDATION INC: $166,000 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE POOL & PARK FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetBEAR PAW VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $146,000 over 7y, 33% of budgetWESTERN SUSTAINABILITY EXCHANGE: $145,000 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetAccess Unlimited Inc: $140,000 over 7y, 39% of budgetGREAT FALLS RESCUE MISSION: $122,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetGREAT FALLS CLINIC LEGACY FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetBENEFIS HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC: $110,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF MONTANA INC: $105,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetYCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $104,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetAWARE INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBIG SKY YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT INC: $100,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetGREAT FALLS CHILDREN'S RECEIVING HOME: $92,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetRURAL MONTANA FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 3y, 87% of budgetYOUNG PARENTS' EDUCATION CENTER: $85,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetFRIENDS OF BEAVER CREEK PARK INC: $78,000 over 1y, 67% of budgetRED ANTS PANTS FOUNDATION: $67,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMONTANA METH PROJECT: $65,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetOperation Warm Inc: $61,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPEACE PLACE: $57,500 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetYWCA GREAT FALLS: $55,700 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR YOUTH INC: $55,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetROUNDUP MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRanchers Stewardship Alliance: $50,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetONE MONTANA: $50,000 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetMONTANA FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION: $48,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetFLORENCE CRITTENTON HOME AND SERVICES: $45,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetOKLAHOMA HEART HOSPITAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $43,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $27,150 over 2y, 23% of budgetSWEET MEMORIAL NURSING HOME: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LEWISTOWN: $25,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHAVRE BENEATH THE STREETS: $23,002 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetBRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $23,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMONTANA STOCKGROWERS FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetMAPS MEDIA INSTITUTE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE ROCKIES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL MONTANA: $20,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetSOUTHERN OKLAHOMA AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEWIS & CLARK FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetNCHA CHARITIES FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRIGG - C M RUSSELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL K RANCH ↗
  • Who funds Montana State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA ↗
  • Who funds ST DOMINIC SAVIO ACADEMY INC DBA STORY AUTISM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PRODUCERS PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON DAVID MCNEEL MEMORIAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA FFA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE POOL & PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEAR PAW VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN SUSTAINABILITY EXCHANGE ↗
  • Who funds Access Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREAT FALLS RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds GREAT FALLS CLINIC LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BENEFIS HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF MONTANA INC ↗
  • Who funds YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG SKY YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT FALLS CHILDREN'S RECEIVING HOME ↗
  • Who funds RURAL MONTANA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG PARENTS' EDUCATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BEAVER CREEK PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds RED ANTS PANTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA METH PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Operation Warm Inc ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE MOUNT GREAT FALLS ↗
  • Who funds PEACE PLACE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dennis & Phyllis Washington FoundationMT52.5× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Gianforte Family Charitable Trust · Otto Bremer Trust · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Cross Charitable Foundation Attn John R Clark · Treacy Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Montana Healthcare Foundation · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Sample Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Browning Kimball Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Browning Kimball Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Browning Kimball Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Browning Kimball Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 140 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Browning Kimball’s filings →

    More from the funding graph