Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Brooks Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$770k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$2.1MEnvironment$875kPublic Benefit$500kArts & Culture$425kHuman Services$165kAnimals$135kRecreation & Sports$135k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $245k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $225k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND$300,000
UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND$100,000
AMERICAN LANDS PROJECT$75,000
ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE$50,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$25,000
SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON FOUNDATION$25,000
SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY$25,000
C895 - KNHC PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION$25,000
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$25,000
SOUTH SOUND YMCA$25,000
KCTS 9 - CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA$25,000
KUOW - PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO$25,000
WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION$25,000
YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE$10,000
PACIFIC PUBLIC MEDIA (KNKX885)$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $10k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $10k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $10k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.2M · 15 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
0

Total granted

$4.2M
$0

Still filing today

80%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentCivil RightsAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CK
    C895 KNHC PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $135k · revenue +158%
  • WT
    WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $135k · revenue +61%
  • TH
    THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $135k · revenue +66%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Puget Sound Restoration Fund

    To restore habitat, water quality and native species in the puget sound

    Environment
    2
    Washington State University Foundation

    The mission of the Foundation is to promote, accept, and maximize private support for programs, initiatives, and properties of Washington State University and its regional campuses. The Foundation also prudently manages, invests, and…

    Education
    3
    Association of Washington Cities

    The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

    4
    Npr Foundation

    The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

    5
    Aclu of Washington Endowment Fund

    To protect and extend civil liberties and civil rights by supporting the aclu-wa foundation.

    6
    Life Science Washington

    Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

    7
    Washington Wild

    Washington wild protects and restores wild lands and waters in washington state through advocacy, education and civic engagement.

    Animals
    8
    The Water Research Foundation

    The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

    Environment
    9
    Great Peninsula Conservancy

    Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

    Environment
    10
    Washington Society of Certified Public a

    We are a community of cpas and financial professionals cultivating authentic relationships, unique learning experiences, and purposeful advocacy for our future.

    11
    Seattle Foundation

    Seattle foundation's mission is to ignite powerful and rewarding philanthropy to make greater seattle a stronger, more vibrant community for all.

    Philanthropy
    12
    Seattle Public Library Foundation

    The seattle public library foundation inspires the community's philanthropic support, advocacy for, and pride in the library.

    Education

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Humane Society for Seattleking County and the most unlike its peers is C895 Knhc Public Radio Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    13/13
    Grantees still filing
    9/13
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    THE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND — $1,775,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUNDC895 KNHC PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION — $135,000 · EducationC895 KNHC PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATIONSigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation — $127,000 · EducationSigma Alpha Epsilon FoundationUCLA FOUNDATION — $125,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION+1 more — $30,000 · EducationALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE — $525,000 · EnvironmentALASKA WILDERNESS L…AMERICAN LANDS PROJECT — $225,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN LANDS PROJ…KCTS 9 - CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA — $135,000 · OtherKCTS 9 - CASCA…WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION — $135,000 · OtherWASHINGTON TRA…SOUTH SOUND YMCA — $125,000 · OtherSOUTH SOUND YM…NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $125,000 · OtherNATIONAL PARK …PACIFIC PUBLIC MEDIA (KNKX885) — $20,000 · OtherVOTO LATINO FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 · Civil RightsVOTO LATINO F…THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY — $135,000 · AnimalsKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO — $135,000 · Arts & CultureTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) — $40,000 · Human Services
    Education$2,192,000Environment$750,000Other$540,000Civil Rights$500,000Animals$135,000Arts & Culture$135,000Human Services$40,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND — $1,775,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE — $525,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetVOTO LATINO FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN LANDS PROJECT — $225,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetC895 KNHC PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION — $135,000 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION — $135,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY — $135,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO — $135,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation — $127,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCollege Success Foundation — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND
    • Who funds ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE
    • Who funds VOTO LATINO FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds AMERICAN LANDS PROJECT
    • Who funds C895 KNHC PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION
    • Who funds WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION
    • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY
    • Who funds KUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO
    • Who funds Sigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation
    • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
    • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION
    • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871)
    • Who funds College Success Foundation

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Brooks Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph