Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Brian and Phyllis Harvey Foundation Co Darin Harvey

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$187k
Largest
01What you fund
0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Health$2.0MEducation$1.1MCivil Rights$1.1MCommunity Improvement$350kArts & Culture$135kHuman Services$75kAnimals$5kOther$2.3M
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.3M
$150,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$66M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUEST HOUSE OCALA FOUNDATION$187,000
HIGH FIVES FOUNDATION$151,690
Individual grant recipient$150,000
THE UCLA FOUNDATION$150,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES$150,000
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$150,000
CITY OF HOPE$150,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS AN$100,000
LOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGI$100,000
HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION$10,000
MISHKAN TORAH VALLEY COMMUNITY KOLL$5,000
WRESTLE TO SUCCEED$5,000
THE MULTIPLE MYELONIA RESEARCH FOUN$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THORN: $25k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
CT
CA
UT
MD
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.7M · 15 repeat orgs$938k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$4.7M
$777k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+14%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $162k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +78%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +78%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING
    5× · 2019–2025 · $350k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • SH
    SMIDT HEART INSTITUTE AT CEDAR'S SI
    one grant, 2018 · $427k
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +9%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES JEWISH HEALTH
    one grant, 2023 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

3
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
4
Loma Linda University

Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…

Education
5
Usc Care Medical Group Inc

To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…

Health
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
8
Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…

Health
9
La Jolla Institute for Immunology

At la jolla institute for immunology, our scientists focus on understanding how the immune system works in order to promote human health and prevent disease. our discoveries apply to many diseases, ranging from diabetes to heart disease,…

10
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

11
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

12
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ucla Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Linda Blair World Heart Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS AN — $600,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANSMIDT HEART INSTITUTE AT CEDAR'S SI — $426,640 · OtherSMIDT HEART INSTITUTE AT CEDAR'S SICITY OF HOPE — $350,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPEJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $300,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGE…Individual grant recipient — $300,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHIGH FIVES FOUNDATION — $151,690 · OtherHIGH FIVES FOUNDATIONLOS ANGELES JEWISH HEALTH — $100,000 · Other+6 more — $97,500 · OtherChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $1,000,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los AngelesMAYO CLINIC — $500,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICGUEST HOUSE OCALA FOUNDATION INC — $287,000 · HealthGUEST HOUSE OCALA FOUNDATION INCCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $200,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER+1 more — $20,000 · HealthUCLA FOUNDATION — $950,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONSouthern Methodist University — $100,000 · EducationSouthern Methodis…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · EducationANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $1,050,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION …LOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING — $350,000 · Community ImprovementThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $100,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO — $35,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Human ServicesTHORN — $25,000 · Human ServicesLINDA BLAIR WORLD HEART FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Animals
Other$2,325,830Health$2,007,000Education$1,100,000Civil Rights$1,050,000Community Improvement$350,000Arts & Culture$135,000Human Services$75,000Animals$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $1,050,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $1,000,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $950,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $500,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING — $350,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGUEST HOUSE OCALA FOUNDATION INC — $287,000 over 2y, 97% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSouthern Methodist University — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO — $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHORN — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLINDA BLAIR WORLD HEART FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING
  • Who funds GUEST HOUSE OCALA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO
  • Who funds THORN
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LINDA BLAIR WORLD HEART FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Brian and Phyllis Harvey Foundation Co Darin Harvey funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Brian and Phyllis Harvey Foundation Co Darin Harvey?

Find your warmest path to Brian and Phyllis Harvey Foundation Co Darin Harvey through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph