Skip to content

· Public charity

Bread of Life Inc

Bread of life, inc provides programs focused on disaster relief, community development, advocacy and health and human services to support individuals in crisis.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Community Improvement$180kHuman Services$85kYouth Development$60kFood & Nutrition$34kHealth$33kPublic Safety & Disaster$22kCivil Rights$11k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $22,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,220,154 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,198,154 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$22,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Pete & Thomas Foundation$22,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PETE AND THOMAS FOUNDATION: $85k → 17%Pete & Thomas Foundation: $22k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christ Community Health Coalition

To provide medical services to the underpriviledged

Health
2
Center for Third World Organizing

CTWO's mission is to help build and sustain a thriving racial justice movement led by communities of color.

International
3
Working Peoples Free Clinic

Community Healthworx is an organization that promotes health and wellness by providing quality services at no charge to people without access to basic healthcare, and develops and provides programs to address community healthcare needs.

Health
4
Community Justice Alliance Inc

Effectsocialchangethroughadvocacy,communityhealing,andlitigationinracial justiceandimmigrantrights.

Civil Rights
5
Champions Community Health Clinic Inc

Champions Community Health Clinic Inc to provide all-encompassing care and treatment options to patients through our medical health and counseling programs.

Health
6
Community Lawyers Inc

Community Lawyers, Inc. provides underserved low- and no-income community members access to legal representation, pro-bono legal clinics, and community advocacy and engagement.

Crime & Legal
7
Unity Clinic of Texas

To provide free healthcare to uninsured,low income and underserved

Health
8
Community of Change Inc

Community of Change is a nonprofit organization that was created in 2016 with the intention of enhancing wellness, extending kindness, and facilitating healing within our community. Also provide culturally competent, holistic, and wellness…

Human Services
9
Together for Good Inc

To provide vital services and resources for the most vulnerable populations of humanity, beginning in the inner city of Houston,Texas,in an effort to build, maintain and restore The Beloved Community in this generation and for generations…

Human Services
10
Communities United for People

Through education, research, training, and leadership development, we work to improve the social, economic, and environmental conditions of low income workers their families, and communities

Civil Rights
11
Hope Clinic Inc

The Hope Clinic recognizes, educates and medically treats patients who are without resources as well as link those who qualify to established programs to meet their needs. By providing preventative care and routine health maintenance,…

Health
12
St Luke Community Clinic Inc

A nonprofit, community-based organization of volunteers and staff committed to providing access to quality health care services to low income uninsured residents of Front Royal and Warren County. The clinic is a free clinic providing…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Favour Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Collective Action for Youth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE FAVOUR FOUNDATION INC: $180,000 · Community ImprovementTHE FAVOUR FOUNDATION INCPETE AND THOMAS FOUNDATION: $107,000 · Human ServicesPETE AND THOMAS FOUNDATIONCollective Action for Youth: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentCollective…Lucilles 1913 Community Kitchen: $33,659 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY CARE COLLABORATIVE: $16,250 · HealthChrist Clinic: $16,250 · HealthCOMPTON JUNIOR EQUESTRIANS: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsUNTIL FREEDOM INC: $11,000 · Civil Rights
Community Improvement$180,000Human Services$107,000Youth Development$40,000Food & Nutrition$33,659Health$32,500Recreation & Sports$20,000Civil Rights$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPETE AND THOMAS FOUNDATION: $107,000 over 2y, 88% of budgetCollective Action for Youth: $40,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetLucilles 1913 Community Kitchen: $33,659 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCOMPTON JUNIOR EQUESTRIANS: $20,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY CARE COLLABORATIVE: $16,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChrist Clinic: $16,250 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNTIL FREEDOM INC: $11,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bread of Life Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bread of Life Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bread of Life Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Bread of Life Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bread of Life’s filings →

    More from the funding graph