Skip to content

· Public charity

Brattleboro Memorial Hospital

Brattleboro Memorial Hospital will provide community-based quality health services delivered with compassion and respect.

$19k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Housing & Shelter$95kEmployment$90kYouth Development$41kEnvironment$24k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$18,950
Median grant
1
States reached
$94M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Groundworks Collaborative Inc$18,950
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Southern Vermont Area Health Education Center Inc: $30k → 9%UVM AHEC Program: $50k → 10%The Strolling of the Heifers Inc: $6k → 11%UVM AHEC Program: $10k → 10%The Strolling of the Heifers Inc: $6k → 11%The Strolling of the Heifers Inc: $6k → 11%The Strolling of the Heifers Inc: $6k → 11%Boys and Girls Club: $12k → 11%Boys and Girls Club: $11k → 11%Boys and Girls Club: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GROUNDWORKS COLLABORATIVE INC: $94,500 · OtherGROUNDWORKS COLLABORATIVE INCSOUTHERN VERMONT AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC: $90,000 · HealthSOUTHERN VERMONT AREA HEALTH EDUCATION C…Boys and Girls Club of Brattleboro Inc: $40,950 · Youth DevelopmentBoys and Girls Clu…AGRITECH INSTITUTE FOR SMALL FARMS INC: $24,000 · Arts & CultureAGRITECH I…
Other$94,500Health$90,000Youth Development$40,950Arts & Culture$24,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGROUNDWORKS COLLABORATIVE INC: $94,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetSOUTHERN VERMONT AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC: $90,000 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Brattleboro Inc: $40,950 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetAGRITECH INSTITUTE FOR SMALL FARMS INC: $24,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community FoundationVT13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brattleboro Memorial Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brattleboro Memorial Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 53%
  • Groundworks Collaborative Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Boys and Girls Club of Brattleboro Inc: 53% of income from government
  • Agritech Institute for Small Farms Inc: 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brattleboro Memorial Hospital’s filings →

More from the funding graph