Skip to content
Bpo Elks Lodge 1016 at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Bpo Elks Lodge 1016

Handicapped Children Auction Hoop Shoot Drug Awareness Easter Bunny Flag Day National Home National Foundation National Veterans Service Memorial Service Scholarship Youth Activities Community Activities Social and Community Welfare.

$15k
Granted FY2017
5
Grants FY2017
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

51% of Bpo Elks Lodge 1016’s FY2017 grant dollars went to Southeastern Illinois Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2017 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

01What it funds
01FY2017 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $7,812, the rows itemized in this filing. The $15,260 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,448 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$550
Median grant
3
States reached
$455k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SE IL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$4,000
ILLINOIS CRIPPLED CHILDREN$2,810
ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION$550
VOITURE NATIONALE (40 ET 8)$352
NATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL$100
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 13% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL: $100 → 13%VOITURE NATIONALE (40 ET 8): $352 → 16%SE IL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 9%ILLINOIS CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $3k → 11%ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $550 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 5 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,000 · PhilanthropySOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONILLINOIS ELKS CHILDREN'S CARE CORPORATION: $2,810 · HealthILLINOIS ELKS CHILDREN'S CARE CORPORATIO…ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION-VARIOUS CHARITIES: $550 · OtherELKS NATIONAL…VOITURE NATIONALE LA SOCIETE DES 40 HOMMES ET 8 CHEVAUX: $352 · OtherVOITURE NATIO…NATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC: $100 · Public Safety & Disaster
Philanthropy$4,000Health$2,810Other$902Public Safety & Disaster$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetILLINOIS ELKS CHILDREN'S CARE CORPORATION: $2,810 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVOITURE NATIONALE LA SOCIETE DES 40 HOMMES ET 8 CHEVAUX: $352 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bpo Elks Lodge 1016 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bpo Elks Lodge 1016. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports $26k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2017, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bpo Elks Lodge 1016’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home