Skip to content
Boys & Girls Clubs in Indian Country Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Boys & Girls Clubs in Indian Country Inc

The promotion of the health, social, educational, vocational and character development of youth in native american communities served by the native american club affiliates (na boys & girls clubs) of boys & girls clubs of america.

$260k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$260k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$825kYouth Development$474kArts & Culture$69kCivil Rights$30kPublic Benefit$19kEducation$16kHealth$10kHuman Services$10k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$259,838
Median grant
1
States reached
$175k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA$259,838
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BGC OF THE MINNEAPOLIS AMERICAN INDIAN CENTER: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
ID
MT
ND
MN
WI
NY
NV
SD
CA
CO
KS
SC
OK
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys Girls Club
—
2
Boys and Girls Club of Augusta/Waynesboro

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
3
Boys & Girls Club of the Greater West Plains Area

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive and caring citizens.

Youth Development
4
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Northwoods Inc

To empower all youth, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
5
Boys and Girls Club of Pleasants Co

To enable all young people, especially those who need us the most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible adults. the organization is focused on education, health and nutrition, social well being, vocational…

Youth Development
6
Boys and Girls Clubs of West Central Missouri

The mission of the boys & girls clubs of west central missouri is to inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as caring and productive citizens.

Youth Development
7
Boys and Girls Clubs of Siouxland Inc

To inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
8
Boys & Girls Club of Georgetown

None

Youth Development
9
Boys and Girls Club of the Northern Cheyenne Nation

The boys & girls club's mission is to inspire and enable all youth of the northern cheyenne nation and surrounding areas to be productive citizens.

Youth Development
10
Boys & Girls Clubs of North Central Georgia

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need it most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
11
Boys & Girls Clubs of Cooke County Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential, as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

—
12
Boys and Girls Club of Carroll County Inc

To inspire and enable all youth to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of the Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation; the most unlike its peers is Minneapolis American Indian Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMIC RELIEF INC DBA COMIC RELIEF US: $824,863 · PhilanthropyCOMIC RELIEF INC DBA COMIC RELIEF USBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $259,838 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERIC…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DURANT: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DURAN…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE THREE AFFILIATED TRIBES: $15,000 · Youth Development+8 more: $63,750 · Youth Development+8 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF YUROK TRIBE: $35,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB…HOOPA VALLEY INDIAN TRIBE: $30,000 · OtherHOOPA VALLEY INDI…B&GC OF THE COYOTE VALLEY: $26,250 · OtherB&GC OF THE COYOT…BGC OF CATAWBA NATION: $25,000 · OtherBGC OF CATAWBA NA…BOIS FORTE BAND OF CHIPPEWA: $18,750 · OtherBOIS FORTE BAND O…B&GC OF ADAIR COUNTY SCHOOLS: $16,250 · OtherB&GC OF ADAIR COU…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ROSEBUD: $15,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CL…NEZ PERCE TRIBE: $10,000 · OtherWOODLAND BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $10,000 · OtherB&GC OF THE POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS: $10,000 · OtherB&GC OF MARIMN HEALTH (BENEWAH MED CTR): $10,000 · OtherWalker River Paiute Tribe: $8,750 · OtherSOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBE: $7,500 · OtherAKWESASNE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $16,250 · EducationBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE FLATHEAD RESERVATION AND LAKE COUNTY: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsMinneapolis American Indian Center: $10,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$824,863Youth Development$363,588Other$222,500Education$16,250Recreation & Sports$15,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMIC RELIEF INC DBA COMIC RELIEF US: $824,863 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $259,838 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAKWESASNE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $16,250 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ROSEBUD: $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE FLATHEAD RESERVATION AND LAKE COUNTY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE THREE AFFILIATED TRIBES: $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWOODLAND BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHELSEA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREEN COUNTR: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OTTAWA COUNTY: $8,750 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEECH LAKE AREA INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BORDER TOWNS: $6,250 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE MISSOURI RIVER AREA: $6,250 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boys & Girls Clubs of…National Congress of …Boys & Girls Clubs of…First Nations Develop…Good360Saint Paul & Minnesot…Charities Aid Foundat…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Boys & Girls Clubs of AmericaGA47.7× affinity21 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America · National Congress of American Indians Fund · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · First Nations Development Institute · Good360 · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Boys & Girls Clubs in Indian Country Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Boys & Girls Clubs in Indian Country Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Boys & Girls Clubs in Indian Country Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Boys & Girls Clubs in Indian Country Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Boys & Girls Clubs in Indian Country’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home