Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Boymel Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$99k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$559kPhilanthropy$91kReligion$49kArts & Culture$41kEducation$36kInternational$29kHuman Services$10kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$904k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION$51,000
GPA TECH CENTER$20,000
JEWISH STORY PARTNERS$7,500
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND USA$5,000
HOLOCAUST & HUMANITY CENTER$1,500
JEWISH PARTISAN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$1,400
ADATH ISRAEL CONGREGATION$1,300
CHABAD JEWISH CENTER$1,200
CINCINNATI HILLEL$1,200
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$1,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$1,000
SPRINGER SCHOOL & CENTER$1,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $350 → 14%TALBERT HOUSE: $2k → 16%TALBERT HOUSE: $500 → 16%LEGACY RESIDENTIAL HOMES: $750 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OH
CA
KY
VA
AZ
KS
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$676k · 23 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
17

Total granted

$676k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
0%

Still filing today

65%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $545k · revenue +30%
  • TC
    The Center for Holocaust and Humanity Education
    2× · 2018–2025 · $20k · revenue +196%
  • CI
    CARACOLE INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +215%

Funded once

  • MT
    MOTIVATE TO GRADU8
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CO
    Chabad of Columbus Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue 0%
  • JE
    Jewish Education for Every Persongraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +62%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
2
University of Judaism Foundation
3
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
4
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
5
Jewish Life Foundation
6
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
8
Foundation for Cincinnati Jewish Seniors formerly Jewish Home of Cincinnati Inc
Health
9
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

10
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
11
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
12
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Legacy Residential Homes Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic University Foundatio…Veteran Support ServicesSubstance Abuse TreatmentChristian Youth CampsIndependent K-8 SchoolsCancer Support OrganizationsJewish Community Federations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%12%5–10yr21%12%10–20yr14%28%20–35yr16%24%35–55yr20%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%3%5–10yr21%3%10–20yr14%2%20–35yr16%89%35–55yr20%3%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%1/26
the rest of the field
11%
8,036/74,280

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $544,954 · PhilanthropyTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATIONJewish Federation of Cincinnati — $85,713 · PhilanthropyJewish Federation of Cincinnati+2 more — $4,800 · PhilanthropyADATH ISRAEL CONGREGATION — $32,289 · OtherADATH ISRAEL …GPA TECH CENTER — $20,000 · OtherGPA TECH CENT…CHABAD JEWISH CENTER — $7,500 · OtherCHABAD JEWISH…MOTIVATE TO GRADU8 — $5,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $3,572 · OtherChabad of Columbus Inc — $4,300 · Other+22 more — $22,362 · Other+22 moreThe Center for Holocaust and Humanity Education — $19,500 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $10,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH STORY PARTNERS — $7,500 · Arts & CultureJewish Partisan Education Foundation — $3,200 · Arts & CultureJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC — $15,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $11,800 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE — $1,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $1,000 · InternationalCARACOLE INC — $11,250 · Housing & ShelterYavneh Day School Association — $4,000 · EducationSPRINGER SCHOOL AND CENTER — $3,250 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $2,000 · EducationCINCINNATI HEBREW DAY SCHOOL INC — $1,500 · EducationWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $2,350 · Human ServicesTALBERT HOUSE — $2,000 · Human ServicesLEGACY RESIDENTIAL HOMES INC — $750 · Human Services
Philanthropy$635,467Other$95,023Arts & Culture$40,200International$28,800Housing & Shelter$11,250Education$10,750Human Services$5,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $544,954 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Federation of Cincinnati — $85,713 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Center for Holocaust and Humanity Education — $19,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC — $15,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $11,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARACOLE INC — $11,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChabad of Columbus Inc — $4,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYavneh Day School Association — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGER SCHOOL AND CENTER — $3,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Partisan Education Foundation — $3,200 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetJewish Education for Every Person — $3,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $2,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Livingston Inc — $2,340 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTALBERT HOUSE — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITMENT 2 KIDS INC — $1,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCINCINNATI HEBREW DAY SCHOOL INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY RESIDENTIAL HOMES INC — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH MAHONING LODGE 339 — $360 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION — $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Toots FoundationOH17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Toots Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The Sam and Rachel Boymel Foundation · The Goldstein Family Foundation · The Bernard and Pamela Barbash Family Foundation · Saul Schottenstein Foundation B · Frankel Family Charitable Trust · Farmer Family Foundation · The Scripps Howard Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Boymel Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Boymel Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Boymel Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph