· Public charity
Boston Main Streets Foundation
To revitalize city of boston neighborhood main streets.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $108,830 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,448,419 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,339,589 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $94k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREATER ASHMONT MAIN STREETS | $22,330 |
| JP CENTRESOUTH MAIN STREETS | $17,500 |
| HYDE PARK MAIN STREETS | $17,500 |
| WEST ROXBURY MAIN STREETS INC | $12,500 |
| FIELDS CORNER MAIN STREETS | $12,500 |
| UPHAMS CORNER MAIN STREETS | $11,500 |
| EAST BOSTON MAIN STREETS | $7,500 |
| ALLSTON VILLAGE MAIN STREETS | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +96% since the first grant, against +72% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HPHYDE PARK MAIN STREETS INC6× · 2017–2025 · $73k · revenue +96%
- CSCENTRE SOUTH MAIN STREETS INC6× · 2018–2025 · $68k · revenue +135%
- GAGREATER ASHMONT MAIN STREET INC6× · 2017–2025 · $62k · revenue +129%
Funded once
- BGBOWDOIN GENEVA MAIN STREETS INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +27%
- ESEGLESTON SQUARE MAIN STREET INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +72%
- TSTHREE SQUARES MAIN STREET JP INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +107%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Beverly main streets' mission is to promote and enhance beverly's downtown.
Promote and enhance downtown brookville
This organization was organized for the civic purpose of promoting, developing, and advancing business within the district in the downtown area of hyannis, massachusetts.
Community development combining residential living with business development.
To maintain and enhance the viability of Jeffersonville's historic downtown commercial and residential districts, to promote economic revitalization and encourage new businesses, and to initiate and support appropriate building and…
Promotes business economic development and tourism in downtown cambridge, maryland.
Promotion of central business district
To support the local community of east somerville, massachusetts by assisting the local small business community and to create community programming that would bring the diverse community together across cultural divides.
We preserve, revitalize, and support the commercial district, creating a center of choiceby collaborating with residents and stakeholders to foster a successful community.
To increase the economic prosperity and cultural vitality of our community, reestablishing downtown lexington as the vibrant economic and cultutal nexus of our area, while maintaining its unique character
To revitalize city of boston neighborhood main streets.
The mission of Fell's Point Main Street is to promote and encourage economic development while strengthening and revitalizing the greater Fell's Point business district in ways that meet the needs of businesses, residents, and visitors…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brighton Main Streets Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bams Fest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HYDE PARK MAIN STREETS INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRE SOUTH MAIN STREETS INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER ASHMONT MAIN STREET INC ↗
- Who funds WEST ROXBURY MAIN STREETS INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTON MAIN STREETS INC ↗
- Who funds ROSLINDALE VILLAGE MAIN STREET INC ↗
- Who funds ROXBURY MAIN STREETS REVITALIZATION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds UPHAMS CORNER MAIN STREET INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds FIELDS CORNER MAIN STREET INC ↗
- Who funds FOUR CORNERS MAIN STREET INC ↗
- Who funds BOWDOIN GENEVA MAIN STREETS INC ↗
- Who funds ALLSTON VILLAGE MAIN STREETS INC ↗
- Who funds EAST BOSTON GATEWAY INC ↗
- Who funds EGLESTON SQUARE MAIN STREET INC ↗
- Who funds THREE SQUARES MAIN STREET JP INC ↗
- Who funds MATTAPAN SQUARE MAIN STREETS INC ↗
- Who funds BAMS FEST INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION HILL MAIN STREETS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Boston Main Streets Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Uphams Corner Main Street Incorporated — 31% of income from government
- Hyde Park Main Streets Inc — 27% of income from government
- Allston Village Main Streets Inc — 17% of income from government
- Mattapan Square Main Streets Inc — 16% of income from government
- Roslindale Village Main Street Inc — 10% of income from government
- Mission Hill Main Streets Inc — 10% of income from government
- Bams Fest Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Boston Main Streets Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Boston Main Streets Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.