Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Boston Area Gleaners Inc

Boston area gleaners is committed to increasing access to fresh fruits and vegetables across our communities while supporting our region's farms and reducing systemic food waste.

$1.2M
Granted FY2021
35
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$370k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2021 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 35 grants below total $1,095,304 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,246,898 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $151,594 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k15 grants · $102k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $345k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $278k
  • $250k+1 grant · $370k
$12,248
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD FOR FREE$370,342
FAIR FOODS$134,683
LAZARUS HOUSE$85,787
Individual grant recipient$57,725
CHELSEA SALVATION ARMY$48,769
FOOD LINK$46,923
VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS UNDER 5000$34,683
BRAZILLIAN WORK CENTER$32,214
LEXINGTON FOOD PANTRY$25,684
HEALTH WALTHAM$19,613
HEET TIME OF CHARGE$15,864
ROSE'S BOUNTY FOOD PANRY$15,164
Individual grant recipient$15,051
CENTRE ST FOOD PANTRY$14,966
LYNN SALVATION ARMY$14,546
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BROOKLINE FOOD PANTRY: $12k → 7%EVERETT GRACE FOOD PANTRY: $6k → 8%LAZARUS HOUSE: $86k → 10%ST JOHNS FOODS FOR THE POOR: $11k → 11%ROSE'S BOUNTY FOOD PANRY: $15k → 16%BROOKLINE FOOD CO-OP: $7k → 7%WATERTOWN FOOD PANTRY: $8k → 8%CCF MINISTRIES: $7k → 10%COLONY RETIREMENT HOUSE: $7k → 11%CHELSEA SALVATION ARMY: $49k → 16%HEALTH WALTHAM: $20k → 8%HEET TIME OF CHARGE: $16k → 10%MGH REVERE HEALTHCARE CENTER FOOD P: $7k → 16%FOOD LINK: $47k → 8%LYNN SALVATION ARMY: $15k → 10%DAILY TABLE: $7k → 16%VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS UNDER 5000: $35k → 8%BEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS: $6k → 10%BRAZILLIAN WORK CENTER: $32k → 16%LEXINGTON FOOD PANTRY: $26k → 8%NEW ENTRY- FOOD ACCESS PROGRAM: $6k → 10%FAIR FOODS: $135k → 16%DANIEL'S TABLE: $8k → 8%HAVEN FROM HUNGER: $58k → 10%UTEC: $6k → 8%SALEM COA: $14k → 10%PROJECT SOUP: $9k → 8%MALDEN YMCA: $6k → 8%MYSTIC CMMUNITY MARKET: $15k → 8%FAMILY TABLE JFCS: $6k → 8%FOOD FOR FREE: $370k → 8%CENTRE ST FOOD PANTRY: $15k → 8%NEWTON FOOD PANTRY: $11k → 8%BURLINGTON FOOD PANRY PEOPLE HELPI: $8k → 8%ARLIGTON EATS: $13k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Open Pantry of Greater Lowell Inc

The mission of The Open Pantry is to relieve hunger in our community. We aim to connect people to a variety of filling, nutritious, and culturally-appropriate food as well as to other community resources; to advocate on behalf of those in…

2
West Bridgewater Food Pantry Inc

To supply the necessary food to needy residents

Food & Nutrition
3
Berkshire Food Project Inc

To alleviate hunger, food insecurity and social isolation by serving healthy and dignified noontime meals every weekday by providing education in making good, nutritional choices and by helping people access available food resources.

Food & Nutrition
4
Falmouth Food Pantry Inc

our goal is to alleviate hunger through providing healthy foods as well as basic hygiene supplies. We respond also to specific food needs caused by medical and religious requirements.

Food & Nutrition
5
Community Cooks Inc

Community cooks mobilizes individuals, businesses, civic educational and faith-based groups to prepare home-cooked food for vulnerable populations seeking assistance from human service agencies throughout greater boston. the agency…

Food & Nutrition
6
Worcester County Food Bank Inc

To engage, educate and lead worcester county in creating a hunger free community.

Food & Nutrition
7
Tewksbury Community Pantry Inc

The heart of the tewksbury community pantry's mission lies in our commitment to assist residents of tewksbury facing hardships. we extend beyond mere food distribution, offering guidance towards additional resources, ensuring our clients…

Human Services
8
East Boston Community Soup Kitchen Inc

To feed, shelter and assist with recovery and self-care the hungry and homeless in our community, and to do so without judgement or exclusivity

Human Services
9
Wellfleet Food Pantry

To address food insecurity and provide food to members of the community in need, and all ancillary matters related thereto.

Education
10
Central Ma Food Rescue Inc

Full belly foods purchases food from farms and wholesalers and donates the food to low-income communities across the country.

Food & Nutrition
11
Digger Foods Inc

The digger foods, inc.'s mission is to make local, organic, and seasonal food available to everyone in the local area. in september 2022, the organization launched a local food delivery program in and around brockton. our goal is to…

Food & Nutrition
12
North Berwick Food Pantry

Our mission is to provide nutritous food and essential non-food items for those in need residing in north berwick, berwick, south berwick, lebanon and surrounding areas. we promise to offer our services with love and respect, and in a…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Salem Pantry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyRecreational Social ClubsHistoric Preservation & Con…Trade & Labor UnionsProfessional Associations &…Professional & Industry Ass…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%6%<5yr14%9%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr19%19%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr14%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr19%5%20–35yr13%75%35–55yr14%0%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/70
the rest of the field
11%
2,734/25,627

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/65
Grantees still filing
36/65
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FAIR FOODS INC — $134,683 · OtherFAIR FOODS INCIndividual grant recipient — $57,725 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHELSEA SALVATION ARMY — $48,769 · OtherCHELSEA SALVATION ARMYVARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS UNDER 5000 — $34,683 · OtherVARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS UNDER 5000BRAZILLIAN WORK CENTER — $32,214 · OtherBRAZILLIAN WORK CENTERLEXINGTON FOOD PANTRY — $25,684 · Other+19 more — $188,786 · Other+19 moreFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC — $370,342 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INCFOOD LINK INC — $46,923 · Food & NutritionFOOD LINK INC+4 more — $37,719 · Food & Nutrition+4 moreLAZARUS HOUSE INC — $85,787 · Housing & ShelterHealthy Waltham Inc — $19,613 · HealthUTEC Inc — $6,247 · Youth DevelopmentBEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I — $6,129 · Community Improvement
Other$522,544Food & Nutrition$454,984Housing & Shelter$85,787Health$19,613Youth Development$6,247Community Improvement$6,129

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC — $370,342 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetLAZARUS HOUSE INC — $85,787 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetFOOD LINK INC — $46,923 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetHealthy Waltham Inc — $19,613 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBROOKLINE FOOD PANTRY INC — $12,248 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC — $10,743 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDANIEL'S TABLE INC — $7,951 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE URBAN FOOD INITIATIVE INC — $6,777 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUTEC Inc — $6,247 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I — $6,129 over 5y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC
  • Who funds LAZARUS HOUSE INC
  • Who funds FOOD LINK INC
  • Who funds Healthy Waltham Inc
  • Who funds BROOKLINE FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds NEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds DANIEL'S TABLE INC
  • Who funds THE URBAN FOOD INITIATIVE INC
  • Who funds UTEC Inc
  • Who funds BEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA39.5× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Analog Devices Foundation · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Middlesex Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Torrice Family Charitable Trust · Project Bread-The Walk for Hunger Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Boston Area Gleaners Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • Utec Inc46% of income from government
  • Food Link Inc9% of income from government
  • Food for Free Committee Inc3% of income from government
  • Lazarus House Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $4.6M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph