Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bonnie Ann Larson Charitable Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.1MEducation$234kPhilanthropy$176kAnimals$60kHealth$60kReligion$52kYouth Development$50kInternational$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$576k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Detroit Symphony Orchestra$20,000
Community Foundation SE Michigan$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Soaring Unlimited: $10k → 9%Soaring Unlimited: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 8 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$1.5M
$138k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+10%

Still filing today

50%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    4× · 2017–2022 · $875k · revenue +46%
  • MS
    MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $210k
  • DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $210k · revenue -12%

Funded once

  • BO
    Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • C
    Cranbrook
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
2
Michigan Farmers Market Association

Mifma supports the viability of all community-driven marketplaces so that they can connect all consumers to local farms and businesses.

Food & Nutrition
3
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
4
The Center for Michigan

For all state residents, diverse civic stakeholders and philanthropy, the center for michigan (the center) and its nonprofit newsrooms - bridge michigan and bridgedetroit - make michigan better through high-quality, nonpartisan journalism…

Public Benefit
5
Detroit Regional Chamber

The chamber is the voice for business and works to power the economy for southeast michigan through public policy, advocacy and leading regional economic development and talent initiatives.

—
6
Cedar Rapids Museum of Art

To excite, engage and educate through the arts.

Arts & Culture
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
College for Creative Studies

The college for creative studies nurtures the creativity that is vital to the enrichment of modern culture. the college educates visual artists and designers, knowledgeable in varied fields, who will be leaders in creative professions that…

Education
9
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
10
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
11
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
12
The Dayton Art Institute

The dayton art institute is committed to enriching the community by creating meaningful experiences with art that are available to all.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan; the most unlike its peers is Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $875,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTSDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $210,000 · Arts & CultureDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $210,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN THE USA FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $32,000 · OtherUNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH…1st Presbyterian Church: $20,000 · OtherCranbrook: $15,000 · Other+8 more: $62,800 · Other+8 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $141,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY…THE NEW ALBANY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $50,000 · HealthBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthBurr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentSOARING UNLIMITED DBA CENTRE DE SANTE SOARING PISTER: $20,000 · Human ServicesCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $9,080 · Education
Arts & Culture$1,086,000Other$409,800Philanthropy$146,000Health$60,000Youth Development$50,000Human Services$20,000Education$9,080

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $875,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $210,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $141,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSOARING UNLIMITED DBA CENTRE DE SANTE SOARING PISTER: $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $9,080 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW ALBANY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCULTURESOURCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds KIDS KICKING CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State ↗
  • Who funds SOARING UNLIMITED DBA CENTRE DE SANTE SOARING PISTER ↗
  • Who funds BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW ALBANY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CULTURESOURCE ↗
  • Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bonnie Ann Larson Charitable Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bonnie Ann Larson Charitable Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bonnie Ann Larson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph