Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bonnie and Ronald Fein Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$608k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Arts & Culture$688kPhilanthropy$50kEmployment$20kHealth$16kReligion$7kHousing & Shelter$5kAnimals$3kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $250k+1 grant · $600k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$975k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART$600,000
HALLIE FORD MUSEUM OF ART$5,000
PHASE ONE FOUNDATION$2,500
WOMEN'S GUILD OF CEDARS SINAI$350
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LANGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$754k · 10 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +64% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$754k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+64%

Still filing today

80%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MUSEUM ASSOCIATES
    2× · 2021–2023 · $610k · revenue +89%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +14%
  • JS
    JVS SOCAL
    2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • TE
    TEMPLE EMANUEL OF BEVERLY HILLS
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • TH
    THE HOUSE INSTITUTE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +64%
  • JS
    JVS SOCAL HOME
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Armand Hammer Museum of Art and Cultural Center Inc

The hammer museum at ucla believes in the promise of art and ideas to illuminate our lives and build a more just world.

Arts & Culture
2
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
3
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

4
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
5
Los Angeles International Dance Festival
6
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
7
Los Angeles Medical Center Foundation
Health
8
California Institute of Contemporary Art
9
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

10
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
11
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
12
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Richard Hampton Jenrette Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MUSEUM ASSOCIATES — $610,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASSOCIATESLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $50,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION+1 more — $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH FEDERATION — $50,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH FE…WALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR PERFOMRING ARTS — $10,000 · OtherWALLIS ANNENB…TEMPLE EMANUEL OF BEVERLY HILLS — $6,585 · OtherTEMPLE EMANUE…University of Michigan — $6,560 · OtherUniversity of…JVS SOCAL HOME — $5,000 · OtherHALLIE FORD MUSEUM OF ART — $5,000 · OtherWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS — $5,000 · Other+7 more — $6,300 · Other+7 moreJVS SOCAL — $20,000 · EmploymentTHE HOUSE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · HealthPHASE ONE FOUNDATION — $2,500 · HealthCITY OF HOPE — $1,177 · HealthLANGE FOUNDATION — $3,000 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$665,000Other$94,445Employment$20,000Health$8,677Human Services$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES — $610,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJVS SOCAL — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $6,560 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE HOUSE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLANGE FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPHASE ONE FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRICHARD HAMPTON JENRETTE FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF HOPE — $1,177 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds JVS SOCAL
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds THE HOUSE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
  • Who funds LANGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PHASE ONE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds RICHARD HAMPTON JENRETTE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CITY OF HOPE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bonnie and Ronald Fein Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bonnie and Ronald Fein Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bonnie and Ronald Fein Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph