· Private foundation
Bohemian Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 228 grants below total $14,354,972 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $15,679,922 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,324,950 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k102 grants · $289k
- $10k–50k68 grants · $1.3M
- $50k–250k41 grants · $4.3M
- $250k+17 grants · $8.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Elevation Community Land Trust | $1,000,000 |
| Save the Chimps, Inc. | $1,000,000 |
| Center for Disaster Philanthropy, Inc. | $750,000 |
| National Trust for Local News | $750,000 |
| American Oversight Inc. | $700,000 |
| Parentstogether Foundation | $500,000 |
| Neighbor to Neighbor, Inc. | $500,000 |
| Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains | $500,000 |
| National Trust for Local News | $500,000 |
| Advance Democracy Inc. | $450,000 |
| Draper Richards Kaplan Foundation | $300,000 |
| William J Brennan Jr Center For Justice Inc. | $250,000 |
| National Trust for Local News | $250,000 |
| Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Inc. | $250,000 |
| Alight | $250,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
117 repeat relationships — 102 still active in FY2023, 15 since wound down; 42 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.7M went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RMRocky Mountain Innovation Initiative2× · 2021–2022 · $6.8M
- CSColorado State University Foundation3× · 2021–2023 · $6.3M
- CFCenter for Disaster Philanthropy, Inc.3× · 2021–2023 · $2.3M
Funded once
- FFFaith Family Hospitality of Fort Collins, Inc. dba Family Housing Network of FCone grant, 2021 · $300k
- IFInstitute for Strategic Dialogue Usone grant, 2022 · $300k
- TBThe Bell Projectone grant, 2021 · $250k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2021–2023.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2021–2023, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 240 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Bohemian Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Bohemian Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.