Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bogatin Foundation II

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$277kRecreation & Sports$179kCivil Rights$65kHealth$51kArts & Culture$18kInternational$6kYouth Development$5kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $51k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ISREAL TENNIS AND ED$25,000
ALL ABOUT THE CAT RESCUE$14,307
Individual grant recipient$11,600
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
CARING FIELDS FELINES$5,000
BERKSHIRE HILLS EISENBERG CAMP$1,000
FUREVR SAVED$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AFTER TALK: $6k → 14%CARING FIELDS FELINES: $5k → 10%KITTY KARMA: $103k → 11%ISRAELI TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATIONS INC: $38k → 13%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $10k → 11%CHANCE AT LIFE CAT RESCUE: $4k → 7%AFTERTALK: $6k → 14%PALM BEACH ROWING: $20k → 10%KITTY KARMA: $90k → 11%ISRAELI TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATIONS INC: $27k → 13%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $10k → 11%AFTER TALK: $5k → 14%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT: $2k → 17%PALM BEACH ROWING: $17k → 10%ISRAELI TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATIONS INC: $26k → 13%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 11%AFTERTALK: $3k → 14%PALM BEACH ROWING: $7k → 10%PUZILLA CAT RECUE: $6k → 11%ISREAL TENNIS AND ED: $25k → 13%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 11%PALM BEACH ROWING: $6k → 10%PUZILLA CAT RECUE: $2k → 11%ISRAELI TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATIONS INC: $25k → 13%ISRAELI TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATIONS: $25k → 13%ALL ABOUT THE CATS RESCUE: $95k → 11%ISRAELI TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATIONS: $25k → 13%BELLAS PET RESCUE: $87k → 11%ISREAL TENNIS AND ED: $25k → 13%ALL ABOUT THE CATS RESCUE: $48k → 11%ISRAELI TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATIONS: $13k → 13%BELLAS PET RESCUE: $33k → 11%GIRLS RISE UGANDA: $12k → 13%ALL ABOUT THE CATS RESCUE: $32k → 11%GIRLS RISE UGANDA: $2k → 13%ALL ABOUT THE CATS RESCUE: $23k → 11%ALL ABOUT THE CATS RESCUE: $18k → 11%ALL ABOUT THE CAT RESCUE: $14k → 11%ALL ABOUT THE CAT RESCUE: $4k → 11%AFRIPADS FOUND CO GIRLS ARISE UGAND: $3k → 11%AFRIPADS FOUND CO GIRLS ARISE UGAND: $2k → 11%AFRIPADS FOUND CO GIRLS ARISE UGANDA: $2k → 11%PURRZILLA: $10k → 11%PURRZILLA: $5k → 11%PURRZILLA: $3k → 11%MILAGRO CENTER: $10k → 11%MILAGRO CENTER: $2k → 11%IMPACT 100 PBC: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$950k · 16 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$950k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+10%

Still filing today

25%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureHealthSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    All About The Cats Rescue Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $234k · revenue -63% · 68% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $193k
  • IT
    ISRAELI TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATIONS INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $178k

Funded once

  • CA
    CHANCE AT LIFE CAT RESCUE A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +10%
  • I1
    IMPACT 100 PBC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • M
    MISCELLANEOUS
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Canine and Feline Rescue Association Inc

We rescue cats and dogs suffered on the street and in endangered locations in both new york and china. the mission of our no-kill shelter is to provide stray cats with safe haven and veterinary care before placing them in forever loving…

Animals
2
Purrs and Whiskers Inc

Purrs and Whiskers primary function is to find forever homes for cats and kittens that are abandoned, stray, owner turn in, injured/sick, and/or born in feral colonies after we have fully vetted them by spaying/neutering, vaccinating,…

Animals
3
Tabby Tails Cat Rescue

To rescue cats in need provide them with necessary medical care and adopt them into forever homes.

Animals
4
Ellas Feline Rescue Mission

To rescue, rehabilitate, provide veterinary care, and rehome homeless cats.

Animals
5
Urban Cat League Inc

Animal welfare for New York City street cats. Provide sanctuary, adoption and fostering. Promote TNR, manage feral cat colonies. Humane education through presentations, videos and our website.

Animals
6
For Every Rescue a Life Saved

To manage feral and stray cat populations. The process involves trapping the cats in a humane manner, getting them spayed or neutered, vaccinated against rabies, and then returning them to their original location.

Animals
7
Kitten Around Cat Rescue
Animals
8
Love a Cat Charity

To help end euthanasia of unwanted cats by caring for feral and abandoned felines, spaying or neutering them and when appropriate, adopting them out. Monies donated are used for food, litter, bedding and medical expenses.

Animals
9
Animals in Distress Inc

Provides shelter, food, veterinary services and medicine for abandoned and stray cats. No cats are euthanized. All are placed in homes, foster homes or remain at the shelter.

Animals
10
Cat By Cat Inc

Animal rescue and welfare

Animals
11
Purrfect Friends Cat Rescue

Cat Rescue

Animals
12
10 Lives Rescue Ny Inc

To reduce outdoor cat population in New York City through Trap, Neuter, Return (TNR), owner surrender prevention, and rescue, foster, and adoption of stray unowned outdoor cats.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Caring Fields Felines Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $193,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientISRAELI TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATIONS INC: $178,300 · OtherISRAELI TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATIONS INCIndividual grant recipient: $120,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $50,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipientISREAL TENNIS AND ED: $50,000 · OtherISREAL TENNIS AND ED+14 more: $84,410 · Other+14 moreAll About The Cats Rescue Inc: $233,607 · AnimalsAll About The Cats Rescue In…+4 more: $6,500 · AnimalsALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $30,000 · HealthMILAGRO FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureFLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC: $4,500 · Arts & CultureCARING FIELDS FELINES INC: $5,000 · Social SciencePEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$676,910Animals$240,107Health$30,000Arts & Culture$16,500Social Science$5,000Philanthropy$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAll About The Cats Rescue Inc: $233,607 over 7y, 68% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCARING FIELDS FELINES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC: $4,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCHANCE AT LIFE CAT RESCUE A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $3,500 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY CRITTERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds All About The Cats Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILAGRO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CARING FIELDS FELINES INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHANCE AT LIFE CAT RESCUE A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds FUREVER SAVED INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY CRITTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bogatin Foundation II funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bogatin Foundation II. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bogatin Foundation II’s filings →

    More from the funding graph