Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bobby Sherman Volunteer EMT Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$325k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

International$4.1MHuman Services$102kHealth$82kPhilanthropy$30kAnimals$25kEducation$20kCommunity Improvement$20kRecreation & Sports$5kYouth Development$5kOther$2.2M
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$138k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOS ANGELES SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT CO$100,000
BRIGITTE AND BOBBY SHERMAN CHILDREN$75,094
FERRAGAMO FOUNDATION$30,000
BRIGITTE AND BOBBY SHERMAN FOUNDATI$30,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS$20,000
FOUR RINGS MONTANA FAMILY FOUNDATIO$20,000
LOS ANGELES RAMS FOUNDATION$20,000
ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION$10,000
SAINT JUDES CHILDREN RESEARCH HOSPI$10,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SOCIETY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILD HELP: $20k → 11%ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%CATERINAS CLUB: $10k → 10%CATERINA'S CLUB: $300 → 10%CHILDHELP: $3k → 11%CHILDHELP: $3k → 11%CHILDHELP: $3k → 11%CHILDHELP: $2k → 11%CHILDHELP: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
NY
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
TN

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.9M · 10 repeat orgs$685k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
30

Total granted

$5.9M
$475k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $210k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyInternationalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BRIGITTE & BOBBY SHERMAN CHILDRENS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $4.1M · revenue +162% · 100% of their budget
  • IH
    Illumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation
    2× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +112%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • FH
    FAMILY HOUSING ORG
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • TE
    The Elvis Presley Charitable Founda
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • OC
    ORANGE CNTY RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2020 · $40k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
2
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
3
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
4
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
7
California Partnership to End Domestic Violence

The organization's mission is to promote the collective voice of a diverse coalition of organizations and individuals working to eliminate all forms of domestic violence. as an advocate for sociate change, we advance our mission by…

Civil Rights
8
American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities Inc

American lebanese syrian associated charities, inc. (alsac) was founded in 1957 and exists solely to raise funds and build awareness to sustain and grow the mission of st. jude children's research hospital, inc. to advance cures, and means…

Religion
9
The Foundation for Aids Research

Amfar is dedicated to ending the global aids epidemic through innovative research. (see schedule o)

Health
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
Los Angeles Medical Center Foundation
Health
12
Didi Hirsch Psychiatric Service

The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Partners and the most unlike its peers is Four Rings Montana Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%5%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%30%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr11%15%35–55yr13%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%93%10–20yr17%4%20–35yr11%1%35–55yr13%2%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,956

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE BRIGITTE & BOBBY SHERMAN CHILDRENS FOUNDATION — $4,125,000 · InternationalTHE BRIGITTE & BOBBY SHERMAN CHILDRENS FOUNDATIONBRIGITTE AND BOBBYSHERMAN CHILDREN' — $1,000,094 · OtherBRIGITTE AND BOBBYSHERMAN CHILDREN'LOS ANGELES SPORTS FOUNDATION — $368,590 · OtherLOS ANGELES SPORTS FOUNDATIONFERRAGAMO FOUNDATION — $145,000 · OtherFERRAGAMO FOUNDATIONCHILDHELP FOUNDATION — $132,500 · OtherCHILDHELP FOUNDATIONLOS ANGELES SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT CO — $100,000 · Other+27 more — $466,819 · Other+27 moreCHILDHELP INC — $31,500 · Human ServicesIllumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation — $30,000 · Human ServicesHOPE THE MISSION — $30,000 · Human ServicesCATERINAS CLUB — $10,300 · Human ServicesNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $20,600 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $20,200 · HealthFAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA — $20,000 · HealthLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC — $10,420 · HealthNAMI National — $10,300 · HealthFOUR RINGS MONTANA FAMILY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $20,000 · AnimalsDOVE PROJECT — $5,264 · AnimalsLos Angeles Rams Foundation — $20,000 · Education
International$4,125,000Other$2,213,003Human Services$101,800Health$81,520Philanthropy$30,000Animals$25,264Education$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BRIGITTE & BOBBY SHERMAN CHILDRENS FOUNDATION — $4,125,000 over 6y, 100% of budgetCHILDHELP INC — $31,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIllumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE THE MISSION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $20,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $20,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLos Angeles Rams Foundation — $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOLARIS FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC — $10,420 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATERINAS CLUB — $10,300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNAMI National — $10,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOVE PROJECT — $5,264 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetUNITY ICE ACADEMY INC — $5,192 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetMICHAEL'S DAUGHTER FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BRIGITTE & BOBBY SHERMAN CHILDRENS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHILDHELP INC
  • Who funds Illumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation
  • Who funds HOPE THE MISSION
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds Los Angeles Rams Foundation
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds FAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA
  • Who funds FOUR RINGS MONTANA FAMILY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds POLARIS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds CATERINAS CLUB
  • Who funds NAMI National
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DOVE PROJECT

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bobby Sherman Volunteer EMT Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bobby Sherman Volunteer EMT Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bobby Sherman Volunteer EMT Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph