Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bnei Binyamin & Rivka Kalaty Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$261k
Granted FY2023
90
Grants FY2023
9
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Education$511kReligion$154kHuman Services$35kInternational$20kPhilanthropy$14kHealth$10kFood & Nutrition$3kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 90 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k85 grants · $120k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $64k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
$900
Median grant
9
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$76,661
Individual grant recipient$26,000
Individual grant recipient$16,306
Individual grant recipient$12,000
SHAAR HAEMET$10,000
UMJCA$9,400
UMJCA CHARITY FUND$9,180
UMJCA ANGEL FUND$7,420
MY SOLDIER$5,400
CHAI LIFELINE$5,000
TALMOD TORAH KIRYAT SEFER$4,140
EZRA ACADEMY FOREST HILLS$3,600
Individual grant recipient$3,600
GAN ISRAEL$3,000
FRIENDS OF MOSDOT NAHALAT YITZHAQ$2,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 86% of grant dollars ($644k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 14% that went abroad ($107k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MY SOLDIER: $5k → 6%MY SOLDIER: $5k → 6%MY SOLDIER: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
NJ
CA
MD
NC
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 14% of all-years giving ($107k)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Israel$106k · 98 grants
Argentina$360 · 1 grant
United Kingdom$360 · 2 grants
France$250 · 1 grant
Iceland$100 · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$685k · 97 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

97 repeat relationships: 60 still active in FY2023, 37 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

97
39

Total granted

$685k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+86%

Still filing today

14%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’23
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MY SOLDIER INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $16k · revenue +136%
  • CL
    CHAI LIFELINE INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $10k · revenue +38%
  • MW
    MAIMONIDES WAY INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $3k · revenue +198%

Funded once

  • TI
    TSQ INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +86%
  • BA
    Beth Ahron V'Israel - BAVI Chesed Fund Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +40%
  • CO
    CHABAD OF OYSTER BAY
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
5
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
6
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
7
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
8
Rabbi Meir Baal Haness Charity of Jerusalem Inc
Philanthropy
9
The Yad Moach Vlev Foundation
Philanthropy
10
American Friends of Yeshiva Gedolah Matisyahu Inc

To award scholarships and grants to students from the United States attending Yeshivas Gedolah Matisyahu in the State of Israel

Education
11
Mishken Chaim Rivnits

Assistance to the indigent

Religion
12
Tov Vachesed Inc

To provide food baskets for the poor on the jewish holidays

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Yeshiva Meah Shearim Inc; the most unlike its peers is My Soldier Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 166 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $314,153 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $44,227 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $30,140 · Other+146 more: $299,312 · Other+146 moreFRIENDS OF MOSDOT NAHALAT YTZHAQ: $6,200 · ReligionMAIMONIDES WAY INC: $3,400 · ReligionAmerican Friends of Kol Yehuda Inc: $3,180 · ReligionKOLLEL TORAH INC: $2,100 · ReligionBeth Ahron V'Israel - BAVI Chesed Fund Inc: $1,800 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET RAFAEL: $1,500 · ReligionJEWISH HERITAGE MOVEMENT INC: $900 · Religion+3 more: $1,240 · ReligionMY SOLDIER INC: $15,800 · Human ServicesIRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW YORK INC: $13,940 · PhilanthropyCHAI LIFELINE INC: $10,400 · HealthGLOBAL JEWISH ASSISTANCE & RELIEF NETWORK: $1,440 · InternationalYAD EZRA V'SHULAMIT: $661 · InternationalYESHIVAS NACHLAS BNEI SHIMON: $409 · InternationalMASBIA: $281 · Food & Nutrition
Other$687,832Religion$20,320Human Services$15,800Philanthropy$13,940Health$10,400International$2,510Food & Nutrition$281

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMY SOLDIER INC: $15,800 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetIRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW YORK INC: $13,940 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $10,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF MOSDOT NAHALAT YTZHAQ: $6,200 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMAIMONIDES WAY INC: $3,400 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetAmerican Friends of Kol Yehuda Inc: $3,180 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTSQ INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKOLLEL TORAH INC: $2,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBeth Ahron V'Israel - BAVI Chesed Fund Inc: $1,800 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET RAFAEL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $1,440 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL JEWISH ASSISTANCE & RELIEF NETWORK: $1,440 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE MOVEMENT INC: $900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA MEAH SHEARIM INC: $720 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYAD EZRA V'SHULAMIT: $661 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNACHLAT MEIR INSTITUTIONS INC DBA NETIVEY HATORA INSTITUTIONS: $520 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYESHIVAS NACHLAS BNEI SHIMON: $409 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAFULA EDUCATIONAL CENTER INC: $360 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMASBIA: $281 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MY SOLDIER INC ↗
  • Who funds IRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MOSDOT NAHALAT YTZHAQ ↗
  • Who funds MAIMONIDES WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Kol Yehuda Inc ↗
  • Who funds TSQ INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY32× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Ch Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Jmg Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · The Foop Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · The Ojc Fund · Davood and Tamara Zar Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bnei Binyamin & Rivka Kalaty Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bnei Binyamin & Rivka Kalaty Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bnei Binyamin & Rivka Kalaty Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Bnei Binyamin & Rivka Kalaty Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 166 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bnei Binyamin & Rivka Kalaty’s filings →

    More from the funding graph