Skip to content

· Public charity

Bluelight Heals Corporation

To empower individuals to help people understand themselves better to remove negative thinking patterns using spirituality techniques to be happier and healthier.

$16M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$3.7M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$14MHuman Services$22kInternational$12k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $10,148,872, the rows itemized in this filing. The $16,380,563 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,231,691 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $912k
  • $250k+6 grants · $9.2M
$165,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ORGYEN TOBGYAL RINPOCHE (OTR) FOUNDATION$3,727,980
PADMASAMBHAVA BUDDHIST CENTER$1,500,000
ORGYEN TOBGYAL RINPOCHE (OTR) FOUNDATION$1,415,000
LIGHT OF BEROTSANA$1,279,000
TARA MANDALA$1,000,000
DRIKUNG KAGYU FOUNDATION USA$277,244
DRIKUNG KAGYU FOUNDATION USA$202,000
KUNZANG GATSHAL FOUNDATION$165,000
PADMASAMBHAVA BUDDHIST CENTER$160,000
KUNZANG GATSHAL FOUNDATION$150,000
TARA MANDALA$100,000
PADMASAMBHAVA BUDDHIST CENTER$85,400
TARA MANDALA$50,000
DRIKUNG KAGYU FOUNDATION USA$25,000
EMPOWERMENT WORKS$12,248
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ORGYEN TOBGYAL RINPOCHE (OTR) FOUNDATION: $3.7M → 10%EMPOWERMENT WORKS: $12k → 14%KUNZANG GATSHAL FOUNDATION: $165k → 15%SARASWATI BHAWAN: $200k → 10%LIGHT OF BEROTSANA: $1.3M → 13%DRIKUNG KAGYU FOUNDATION USA: $277k → 12%TARA MANDALA: $1.8M → 10%SACHA ALLIANCE: $22k → 14%ORGYEN TOBGYAL RINPOCHE (OTR) FOUNDATION: $1.4M → 10%KUNZANG GATSHAL FOUNDATION: $150k → 15%DRIKUNG KAGYU FOUNDATION USA: $202k → 12%TARA MANDALA: $1.0M → 10%PADMASAMBHAVA BUDDHIST CENTER: $2.3M → 15%DRIKUNG KAGYU FOUNDATION USA: $25k → 12%TARA MANDALA: $100k → 10%PADMASAMBHAVA BUDDHIST CENTER: $1.5M → 15%TARA MANDALA: $50k → 10%PADMASAMBHAVA BUDDHIST CENTER: $160k → 15%PADMASAMBHAVA BUDDHIST CENTER: $85k → 15%PADMASAMBHAVA BUDDHIST CENTER: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $6.2M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$2.8M · 45% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: PRESERVING THE ANCIENT DRIKUNG KAGYU LINEAGE OF TIBETAN BUDDHISM, SPECIFICALLY BY BUILDING 100 MONKS' QUARTERS, TO MEET THE GROWING DEMAND FOR DORMITORIES AT GAR MONASTERY (GARGON) IN NANGQIAN COUNTY, QINGHAI PROVINCE, TIBET, ALLOWING FOR THE MONASTERY TO CONTINUE EXPANDING AND THRIVING. · PRESERVING THE ANCIENT DRIKUNG KAGYU LINEAGE OF TIBETAN BUDDHISM, SPECIFICALLY BY BUILDING A TEMPLE AT HISTORIC GAR MONASTERY (GARGON) IN NANGQIAN COUNTY, QINGHAI PROVINCE, TIBET, ALLOWING FOR THE MONASTERY TO CONTINUE THRIVING.

South Asia$1.8M · 29% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: REBUILDING THE BUDDHIST COLLEGE AND PRESERVING THE LINEAGE MANKHA KYUNG DZONG TO MONKS · COMMISSIONING AND FINALIZING TIBETAN THANGKA PAINTINGS OF DZOGCHEN MASTERS AND SENDING TO TIBET FOR TRADITIONAL, RELIGIOUS USES · PRESERVING AN ANCIENT TRADITION OF TIBETAN MEDICINE, SOWA RIGPA, IN SIMIKOT, HUMLA, NEPAL, SPECIFICALLY BY FUNDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TIBETAN MEDICINE CLINIC WHERE THE TRADITIONAL AMCHI DOCTORS OF THE REGION CAN CONTINUE TO MAKE TRADITIONAL TIBETAN MEDICINE AVAILABLE TO THE POPULATION AND THUS HELP PRESERVE THIS ANCIENT HEALING LINEAGE.

South America$1.6M · 25% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: INFRASTRUCTURE/CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE FIRST STUPA COMPLETED IN PERU AND THE CENTER OF THE DRIKUNG KAGYU ACTIVITY IN THE CUSCO REGION, LOCATED IN CHINCHEROS, PERU, SO THAT THE SPACE CAN SUPPORT GROUP EVENTS AND RETREATS IN FURTHERANCE OF DHARMA ACTIVITIES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THIS PRECIOUS LINEAGE · AGREEMENT FOR BLUELIGHT HEALS CORPORATION TO ASSIST WITH AND SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DRIKUNG KAGYU CUSCO DHARMA CENTER, A BUDDHIST MEDITATION AND RETREAT CENTER, SPECIFICALLY BY PURCHASING PROPERTY IN CUSCO, PERU · PRODUCTION OF A CROSS-CULTURAL, EDUCATIONAL, AND SPIRITUAL PUBLIC EVENT, EL CAMINO DEL SOL, TO BE LED BY DRIKUNG KAGYU MONKS AND NUNS IN CUSCO, PERU, FROM JUNE-JULY OF 2025

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 29% of Bluelight Heals Corporation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Bluelight Heals Corporationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field
05the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OTR FOUNDATION INC: $5,142,980 · OtherOTR FOUNDATION INCPADMASAMBHAVA BUDDHIST CENTER: $4,039,900 · OtherPADMASAMBHAVA BUDDHIST CENTERTARA MANDALA: $2,950,000 · OtherTARA MANDALALIGHT OF BEROTSANA: $1,279,000 · OtherLIGHT OF BEROTSANA+2 more: $222,222 · OtherDrikung Kagyu Foundation USA Inc: $504,244 · ReligionKUNZANG GATSHAL FOUNDATION: $315,000 · ReligionEmpowerment Works Inc: $12,248 · International
Other$13,634,102Religion$819,244International$12,248

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Drikung Kagyu Foundation USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds KUNZANG GATSHAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Empowerment Works Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bluelight Heals Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bluelight Heals Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bluelight Heals Corporation?

    Find your warmest path to Bluelight Heals Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bluelight Heals’ filings →

    More from the funding graph