Skip to content
Blueberry Hill Agm Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Blueberry Hill Agm Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$213k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$54k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$70kEducation$55kHuman Services$54kArts & Culture$53kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kRecreation & Sports$20kYouth Development$15kAnimals$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $109k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $104k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETHANY HOUSE OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA$54,153
MCLEAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$50,000
PROJECT NOELLE$25,000
CARON TREATMENT CENTERS$25,000
JEPSON ALUMNI EXECUTIVE CENTER$24,000
THE WISH CUP$20,000
BENJAMIN GOLDBERG FOUNDATION$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 7%PROJECT NOELLE: $25k → 11%PROJECT NOELLE: $20k → 11%BETHANY HOUSE OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA: $54k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Team Joe Charities

Support Inova Hospital for Children

Philanthropy
2
Norfolk Connecticut Childrens Foundation
—
3
Virginia Congress of Parents and Teachers Lcta Pta

Parent teacher association

—
4
Northern Virginia Health Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Tuckahoe Pta

Tuckahoe Elementary School PTA is herein recognized as a subordinate of the Virginia Congress of Parents and Teachers ("Virginia PTA"). The EIN on record for Tuckahoe Elementary School PTA is XXX-XX-XXXX. Virginia PTA's Group Exemption…

—
6
Virginia Chevy Lovers
Recreation & Sports
7
Norfolk Parent Teacher Organization

Providing financial and volunteer support to the norfolk public schools.

Human Services
8
The Greater Norwich Foundation
—
9
Virginia Professional Fire Fighters
Philanthropy
10
Norfolk Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
11
Nowata Volunteer Fire Department Inc
Public Safety & Disaster
12
Virginia Press Foundation Virginia Local News Project
Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bethany House of Northern Virginia Inc; the most unlike its peers is Butts Road Primary Pta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETHANY HOUSE OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC: $54,153 · Human ServicesBETHANY HOUSE OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA…PROJECT NOELLE: $45,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT NOELLECARON TREATMENT CENTERS: $25,000 · OtherCARON TREATMENT CENTERSJEPSON ALUMNI EXECUTIVE CENTER: $24,000 · OtherJEPSON ALUMNI EXECUTIVE CENTERUNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON: $18,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTONGARRETT COUNTYMARYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY: $7,200 · OtherGARRETT COUNTYMARYLAND HUMANE …UNIVERSARY OF MARY WASHINGTON: $6,000 · OtherUNIVERSARY OF MARY WASHINGTON+5 more: $7,000 · Other+5 moreMCLEAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $50,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMCLEAN VOLUNTEER …GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER WASHINGTO…WISH CUP LLC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsDOWNTOWN NORFOLK FUND: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsBENJAMIN GOLDBERG FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOROLLA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Education
Human Services$99,153Other$87,200Public Safety & Disaster$50,000Arts & Culture$50,000Recreation & Sports$22,000Youth Development$15,000Education$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBETHANY HOUSE OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC: $54,153 over 1y, 11% of budgetMCLEAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $50,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT NOELLE: $45,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetWISH CUP LLC: $20,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetBENJAMIN GOLDBERG FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetDOWNTOWN NORFOLK FUND: $2,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetCOROLLA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blueberry Hill Agm Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blueberry Hill Agm Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Blueberry Hill Agm Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Blueberry Hill Agm Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Blueberry Hill Agm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home