Skip to content
Blockchain Association at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Blockchain Association

Our mission is to advance the future of crypto in the United States, promoting the potential of blockchain technology and shaping policy that ensures its success.

$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$319kCivil Rights$120kScience & Tech$105kEmployment$75kFood & Nutrition$15kHealth$11k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Blockchain Foundation$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%The Global Women's Innovat: $50k → 14%GLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUND: $11k → 12%Morgan State University Fd: $15k → 19%APAICS: $25k → 14%COIN CENTER INC: $85k → 14%COIN CENTER INC: $20k → 14%The Global Women's Innovat: $25k → 14%Blockchain Foundation: $104k → 14%Blockchain Foundation: $100k → 14%Blockchain Foundation: $100k → 14%Congressional Black Caucus: $75k → 14%APAICS: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$545k · 5 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$545k
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+40%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationCivil RightsScience & TechEmploymentHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    BLOCKCHAIN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $304k · revenue +18% · 87% of their budget
  • CC
    Coin Center Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $105k · revenue +41%
  • GW
    GLOBAL WOMENS INNOVATION NETWORK
    2× · 2022–2023 · $75k · revenue +165%

Funded once

  • CB
    CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +40%
  • TM
    THE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +22%
  • GD
    GLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +399%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Us - China Policy Foundation
—
2
Global Women in Blockchain Inc

Global Women in Blockchain (GWB) is the first international umbrella organization designed to activate and accelerate the powerful partnerships of women to lead in the education, development and promotion of blockchain technologies. Our…

—
3
Global Policy Forum Inc

Research and education of United Nations activities

International
4
Techcongress Foundation

Techcongress gives talented technologists the opportunity to gain first-hand experience in federal policymaking and shape the future of tech policy through fellowships with members of congress and congressional committees.

Community Improvement
5
Commoncrawl Foundation
Science & Tech
6
Genomic Data Initiative
Science & Tech
7
Black Women Network

Bwn has an educational and charitable purpose through being dedicated to promoting collaborative entrepreneurial thinking, holistic wellness, expanding equitable funding access and increasing knowledge of high-growth industries including…

Civil Rights
8
Institute for New Global Politics Inc

The Institute for New Global Politics is a California-based educational nonprofit corporation organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes. It is an independent and nonpartisan thinktank dedicated to educating the general…

International
9
The Goldman Sachs Foundation
Philanthropy
10
World Food Prize Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Melton Foundation
Education
12
Crypto Council for Innovation Inc

Cci's mission is to ensure that public policy and regulation support the growth of a resilient and sustainable global digital economy.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congressional Black Caucus Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blockchain Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLOCKCHAIN FOUNDATION: $303,875 · EducationBLOCKCHAIN FOUNDATIONTHE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · EducationCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · Civil RightsCONGRESSIONAL BLACK C…Asian Pacific Amer InstitCongressional: $45,000 · Civil RightsAsian Pacific Amer In…Coin Center Inc: $105,472 · Science & TechCoin Center IncGLOBAL WOMENS INNOVATION NETWORK: $75,000 · EmploymentGLOBAL WOMENS…TASTE OF THE SOUTH: $15,444 · PhilanthropyGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $10,610 · Health
Education$318,875Civil Rights$120,000Science & Tech$105,472Employment$75,000Philanthropy$15,444Health$10,610

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLOCKCHAIN FOUNDATION: $303,875 over 3y, 87% of budgetCoin Center Inc: $105,472 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetGLOBAL WOMENS INNOVATION NETWORK: $75,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAsian Pacific Amer InstitCongressional: $45,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTASTE OF THE SOUTH: $15,444 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $10,610 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ctia - the Wireless A…Pharmaceutical Resear…AARPAmerican Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Ctia - the Wireless AssociationDC16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ctia - the Wireless Association · Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · AARP · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blockchain Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blockchain Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • The Morgan State University Foundation Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Blockchain Association?

Find your warmest path to Blockchain Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Blockchain Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home