Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bli Metzurim Jbb Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
0167% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Human Services$3.2MPhilanthropy$902kReligion$515kArts & Culture$400kYouth Development$24kFood & Nutrition$12kEducation$186Health$61Other$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $44k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $256k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.5M
$10,174
Median grant
1
States reached
$61k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YIDDISH NACHAS$1,119,500
THE OJC FUND$346,700
CONG KYL ISLAND VIEW$100,000
PLEDGER CHARITABLE$96,550
MISCELLANEOUS CHARITY LESS THAN 5000$59,698
Individual grant recipient$21,700
MERKAZ TOLDOS A Y$12,000
ACHIEZER$10,174
Individual grant recipient$6,013
REIYVIM GAM TZMIYIM$6,000
EZRAS ALTA FEIGA$6,000
OHR CHODOSH$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,400
KIPAS HADAYUNIM$5,105
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ACHIEZER: $14k → 6%ACHIEZER: $10k → 6%TZEDUKAS HUIR INC: $12k → 14%Tzedukas Huir: $140 → 14%Avihem: $10 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 14 repeat orgs$558k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
74

Total granted

$4.4M
$536k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+28%

Still filing today

29%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YN
    YIDDISH NACHAS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3.2M · 88% of their budget
  • CK
    CONG KYL ISLAND VIEW
    2× · 2023–2024 · $400k
  • MC
    MISCELLANEOUS CHARITY LESS THAN 5000
    2× · 2023–2024 · $296k

Funded once

  • CG
    CONG GEMACH BNEI PINCHOS
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • MC
    Miscellanous Charity Less than 5000
    one grant, 2022 · $89k
  • KS
    KOLLEL SATMAR OF KJ
    one grant, 2023 · $37k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc

Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations

—
2
Bikur Cholim of Manhattan Inc

To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…

Health
3
Chasdei Yetev Lev Inc

Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.

—
4
Taharusam Inc

To promote authentic orthodox judaisim by helping fund jewish causes worldwide.

Philanthropy
5
Yedidim Usa Inc

Helping jewish community with rent, utilities, repairs, ect.

Human Services
6
Chevra-Kadisha Yerushalayim Inc

To facilitate traditional religious burial for those of the orthodox jewish faith in accordance with the ancient jewish custom of being buried on israeli soil by arranging for the resale of burial plots in israeli cemeteries and providing…

Philanthropy
7
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
8
Ohr Yosef Inc

To help disadvantaged children, widows and orphans by providing food, clothing, supplies and grants to charitable tax exempt organizations.

Philanthropy
9
Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc

The organization was formed to award financial grants and/or loans free of interest, to religious orthodox jewish organizations and individuals who are in distress and need financial relief.

Human Services
10
Bikur Cholim of Crown Heights

To help ill persons

Human Services
11
Tzidkus Avrohom Beinish Inc

To benefit needy individuals and their families; to promote, foster, increase and advance the health, welfare and economic status of low income families.

Philanthropy
12
Zichron Dovid Hakohen Inc

To provide financial assistance, including food and shelter, to needy individuals.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tzedukas Huir Inc; the most unlike its peers is Toras Chesed Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YIDDISH NACHAS INC: $3,194,500 · EducationYIDDISH NACHAS INCTHE OJC FUND: $632,700 · EducationTHE OJC FUNDCONG KYL ISLAND VIEW: $400,000 · OtherCONG KYL ISLAND VIEWMISCELLANEOUS CHARITY LESS THAN 5000: $295,678 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS CHARITY LESS THAN 50…PLEDGER CHARITABLE LTD: $180,550 · OtherPLEDGER CHARITABLE LTDCONG KOLEL SATMAR OF KJ: $107,000 · OtherCONG KOLEL SATMAR OF KJCONG GEMACH BNEI PINCHOS: $100,000 · OtherCONG GEMACH BNEI PINCHOSMiscellanous Charity Less than 5000: $88,602 · Other+77 more: $540,308 · Other+77 moreACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $24,474 · Human ServicesTZEDUKAS HUIR INC: $12,140 · Human Services+1 more: $10 · Human ServicesYAD LTALMID INC: $15,000 · Religion+2 more: $63 · ReligionBIKUR CHOLIM INC: $36 · HealthREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $25 · Health
Education$3,827,200Other$1,712,138Human Services$36,624Religion$15,063Health$61

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYIDDISH NACHAS INC: $3,194,500 over 2y, 88% of budgetTHE OJC FUND: $632,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPLEDGER CHARITABLE LTD: $180,550 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $24,474 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYAD LTALMID INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTORAS CHESED INC: $53 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVIHEM INC: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YIDDISH NACHAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OJC FUND ↗
  • Who funds PLEDGER CHARITABLE LTD ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YAD LTALMID INC ↗
  • Who funds TZEDUKAS HUIR INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY44.1× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Yiddish Nachas Inc · Rovna Ct Foundation · The Schwartz Charitable Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Madanim Foundation · Jl Charitable Foundation · Tyrnauer Family Foundation · Bbc Foundation · Kee Seesu Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bli Metzurim Jbb Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bli Metzurim Jbb Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bli Metzurim Jbb Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph